World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Medicine
Germany
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 160 789 722 34 33 1723 96876

Maximilian F. Reiser publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Maximilian F. Reiser between 1963 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Maximilian F. Reiser published across 63 years, from 1963 to 2025, averaging 28.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 140 publications in 2011. 4 of the 1,803 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1963 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 140. Peak 140 publications in 2011. 1963: 1 publication 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 9 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 13 publications 1996: 19 publications 1997: 25 publications 1998: 46 publications 1999: 52 publications 2000: 114 publications 2001: 44 publications 2002: 60 publications 2003: 45 publications 2004: 69 publications 2005: 64 publications 2006: 88 publications 2007: 113 publications 2008: 113 publications 2009: 119 publications 2010: 111 publications 2011: 140 publications 2012: 78 publications 2013: 91 publications 2014: 64 publications 2015: 66 publications 2016: 49 publications 2017: 68 publications 2018: 43 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 2 publications
1963 2025

1,803 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Maximilian F. Reiser: publications per year, 1963 to 2025
Year Publications
1963 1
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 1
1979 0
1980 3
1981 3
1982 0
1983 2
1984 2
1985 4
1986 5
1987 9
1988 5
1989 3
1990 4
1991 3
1992 4
1993 9
1994 9
1995 13
1996 19
1997 25
1998 46
1999 52
2000 114
2001 44
2002 60
2003 45
2004 69
2005 64
2006 88
2007 113
2008 113
2009 119
2010 111
2011 140
2012 78
2013 91
2014 64
2015 66
2016 49
2017 68
2018 43
2019 12
2020 11
2021 7
2022 4
2023 4
2024 2
2025 2
Total 1,803
Download as CSV

Maximilian F. Reiser publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maximilian F. Reiser sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,721–1,740 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,723 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12 1,723
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Maximilian F. Reiser D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maximilian F. Reiser sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 160–161 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 160 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69 160
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Medicine in Germany Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in Germany Leader Award
  • 2009 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)

Overview

Maximilian F. Reiser is affiliated with Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a significant body of work in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Other areas of specialization include Surgery, Radiation, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine.

Their investigations cover a range of topics related to medical imaging and diagnostic techniques. Key themes in their research include Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging, Orthopedic Infections and Treatments, Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques, Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications, Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research, Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications, and AI in cancer detection.

Recent publications by Maximilian F. Reiser feature studies on cancer detection using blood-based liquid biopsies, tumor response assessment in hepatocellular carcinoma, cardiovascular clinical research platforms, bone marrow edema syndrome as a possible precursor to osteonecrosis, and computed tomography alternatives in emergency radiology. Selected papers include:

  • Infrared molecular fingerprinting of blood-based liquid biopsies for the detection of cancer, 2021, eLife
  • Early tumor shrinkage and response assessment according to mRECIST predict overall survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients under sorafenib, 2022, Cancer Imaging
  • The DZHK research platform: maximisation of scientific value by enabling access to health data and biological samples collected in cardiovascular clinical studies, 2023, Clinical Research in Cardiology
  • Is bone marrow edema syndrome a precursor of hip or knee osteonecrosis? Results of 49 patients and review of the literature, 2020, Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
  • Is It Possible to Replace Conventional Radiography (CR) with a Dose Neutral Computed Tomography (CT) of the Cervical Spine in Emergency Radiology-An Experimental Cadaver Study, 2022, Diagnostics

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Maximilian F. Reiser include Franz Pfeiffer, Katharina Hellbach, Marinus Huber, Kosmas V. Kepesidis, and Liudmila Voronina.

Their work has been published in several recurring scientific venues such as Der Radiologe, Die Radiologie, Scientific Reports, Brain Sciences, and eLife.

Maximilian F. Reiser has been recognized as a Member of the National Academy of Medicine since 2009.

Best Publications

  • Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience

    Thorsten R. C. Johnson;Bernhard Krauß;Martin Sedlmair;Martin Sedlmair;Michael Grasruck

  • Quantification of Obstructive and Nonobstructive Coronary Lesions by 64-Slice Computed Tomography: A Comparative Study With Quantitative Coronary Angiography and Intravascular Ultrasound

    Alexander W. Leber;Andreas Knez;Franz von Ziegler;Alexander Becker

  • Measurement of signal‐to‐noise ratios in MR images: Influence of multichannel coils, parallel imaging, and reconstruction filters

    Olaf Dietrich;José G. Raya;Scott B. Reeder;Scott B. Reeder;Maximilian F. Reiser

  • Effect of whole-body CT during trauma resuscitation on survival: a retrospective, multicentre study

    Stefan Huber-Wagner;Rolf Lefering;Lars-Mikael Qvick;Markus Körner

  • Accuracy of multidetector spiral computed tomography in identifying and differentiating the composition of coronary atherosclerotic plaques. A comparative study with intracoronary ultrasound

    Alexander W Leber;Andreas Knez;Alexander Becker;Christoph Becker

  • Accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography to classify and quantify plaque volumes in the proximal coronary system: a comparative study using intravascular ultrasound.

    Alexander W. Leber;Alexander Becker;Andreas Knez;Franz von Ziegler

  • Multislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective ECG gating: reduction of radiation exposure by ECG-controlled tube current modulation.

    Tobias F. Jakobs;Christoph R. Becker;Bernd Ohnesorge;Thomas Flohr

  • Cardiac Imaging by Means of Electrocardiographically Gated Multisection Spiral CT: Initial Experience

    Bernd Ohnesorge;Thomas Flohr;Christoph Becker;Andreas F. Kopp

  • A Comparison of Paracentesis and Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunting in Patients with Ascites

    Martin Rössle;Andreas Ochs;Veit Gülberg;Volker Siegerstetter

  • Prefrontal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Changes Connectivity of Resting-State Networks during fMRI

    Daniel Keeser;Thomas Meindl;Julie Bor;Ulrich Palm

  • Dual-source CT cardiac imaging: initial experience.

    Thorsten R. C. Johnson;Konstantin Nikolaou;Bernd J. Wintersperger;Alexander W. Leber

  • Metal artifact reduction by dual energy computed tomography using monoenergetic extrapolation

    Fabian Bamberg;Alexander Dierks;Konstantin Nikolaou;Maximilian F. Reiser

  • ECG-gated reconstructed multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: effect of varying trigger delay on image quality.

    Cheng Hong;Christoph R. Becker;Armin Huber;U. Joseph Schoepf

  • Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study to Refine Management Recommendations for Women at Elevated Familial Risk of Breast Cancer: The EVA Trial

    Christiane Kuhl;Stefanie Weigel;Simone Schrading;Birke Arand

  • Subsegmental pulmonary emboli: improved detection with thin-collimation multi-detector row spiral CT.

    U. Joseph Schoepf;Nicolaus Holzknecht;Thomas K. Helmberger;Alexander Crispin

  • Enhancement of focal liver lesions at gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging: correlation with histopathologic findings and spiral CT--initial observations.

    Alexander Huppertz;Sibylle Haraida;Armin Kraus;Christoph J. Zech

  • Dual energy CT characterization of urinary calculi: initial in vitro and clinical experience.

    Anno Graser;Thorsten R. C. Johnson;Markus Bader;Michael Staehler

  • Dual-energy CT in patients suspected of having renal masses: can virtual nonenhanced images replace true nonenhanced images?

    Anno Graser;Thorsten R.C. Johnson;Elizabeth M. Hecht;Christoph R. Becker

  • Use of Neuroanatomical Pattern Classification to Identify Subjects in At-Risk Mental States of Psychosis and Predict Disease Transition

    Nikolaos Koutsouleris;Eva M. Meisenzahl;Christos Davatzikos;Ronald Bottlender

  • Association of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor Val66Met polymorphism with reduced hippocampal volumes in major depression.

    Thomas Frodl;Cornelius Schüle;Gisela Schmitt;Christine Born

Frequent Co-Authors

Konstantin Nikolaou
Konstantin Nikolaou University of Tübingen
Christoph R. Becker
Christoph R. Becker Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Stefan O. Schoenberg
Stefan O. Schoenberg Heidelberg University
Jürgen Debus
Jürgen Debus University Hospital Heidelberg
Birgit Ertl-Wagner
Birgit Ertl-Wagner University of Toronto
Thomas Meindl
Thomas Meindl Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Hans-Jürgen Möller
Hans-Jürgen Möller Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Harald Hampel
Harald Hampel Eisai (United States)
Franz Pfeiffer
Franz Pfeiffer Technical University of Munich
Christine Born
Christine Born Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering alternative pathways in the healthcare field, there are several flexible online degree options beyond a traditional MD. For those who want a patient-focused role but may not meet the most rigorous admission standards, you can explore easy nursing schools to get into. These programs often feature accessible entry requirements, helping more students launch nursing careers.

Interested in a non-clinical healthcare role? Consider a career in medical billing and coding. There are many reputable medical billing and coding schools online with financial aid, making it easier to gain these in-demand skills from home.

If standardized tests are a barrier for you, look for nursing school without teas test requirements. These programs can provide a smoother admission process while still offering robust training.

For a leadership position in the health sector, an best online healthcare administration degree can be completed quickly and prepares you for roles in management or operations. These alternatives open diverse doors in healthcare—many of which are accessible, affordable, and fully online.

Best Scientists Citing Maximilian F. Reiser

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles