World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Medicine
Germany
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
160
Citations
96876
World Ranking
789
National Ranking
34

Maximilian F. Reiser publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maximilian F. Reiser sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,723 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Maximilian F. Reiser D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maximilian F. Reiser sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 160 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Medicine in Germany Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in Germany Leader Award
  • 2009 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)

Overview

Maximilian F. Reiser is affiliated with Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a significant body of work in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Other areas of specialization include Surgery, Radiation, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine.

Their investigations cover a range of topics related to medical imaging and diagnostic techniques. Key themes in their research include Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging, Orthopedic Infections and Treatments, Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques, Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications, Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research, Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications, and AI in cancer detection.

Recent publications by Maximilian F. Reiser feature studies on cancer detection using blood-based liquid biopsies, tumor response assessment in hepatocellular carcinoma, cardiovascular clinical research platforms, bone marrow edema syndrome as a possible precursor to osteonecrosis, and computed tomography alternatives in emergency radiology. Selected papers include:

  • Infrared molecular fingerprinting of blood-based liquid biopsies for the detection of cancer, 2021, eLife
  • Early tumor shrinkage and response assessment according to mRECIST predict overall survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients under sorafenib, 2022, Cancer Imaging
  • The DZHK research platform: maximisation of scientific value by enabling access to health data and biological samples collected in cardiovascular clinical studies, 2023, Clinical Research in Cardiology
  • Is bone marrow edema syndrome a precursor of hip or knee osteonecrosis? Results of 49 patients and review of the literature, 2020, Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
  • Is It Possible to Replace Conventional Radiography (CR) with a Dose Neutral Computed Tomography (CT) of the Cervical Spine in Emergency Radiology-An Experimental Cadaver Study, 2022, Diagnostics

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Maximilian F. Reiser include Franz Pfeiffer, Katharina Hellbach, Marinus Huber, Kosmas V. Kepesidis, and Liudmila Voronina.

Their work has been published in several recurring scientific venues such as Der Radiologe, Die Radiologie, Scientific Reports, Brain Sciences, and eLife.

Maximilian F. Reiser has been recognized as a Member of the National Academy of Medicine since 2009.

Best Publications

  • Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience

    Thorsten R. C. Johnson;Bernhard Krauß;Martin Sedlmair;Martin Sedlmair;Michael Grasruck

  • Quantification of Obstructive and Nonobstructive Coronary Lesions by 64-Slice Computed Tomography: A Comparative Study With Quantitative Coronary Angiography and Intravascular Ultrasound

    Alexander W. Leber;Andreas Knez;Franz von Ziegler;Alexander Becker

  • Measurement of signal‐to‐noise ratios in MR images: Influence of multichannel coils, parallel imaging, and reconstruction filters

    Olaf Dietrich;José G. Raya;Scott B. Reeder;Scott B. Reeder;Maximilian F. Reiser

  • Effect of whole-body CT during trauma resuscitation on survival: a retrospective, multicentre study

    Stefan Huber-Wagner;Rolf Lefering;Lars-Mikael Qvick;Markus Körner

  • Accuracy of multidetector spiral computed tomography in identifying and differentiating the composition of coronary atherosclerotic plaques. A comparative study with intracoronary ultrasound

    Alexander W Leber;Andreas Knez;Alexander Becker;Christoph Becker

  • Accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography to classify and quantify plaque volumes in the proximal coronary system: a comparative study using intravascular ultrasound.

    Alexander W. Leber;Alexander Becker;Andreas Knez;Franz von Ziegler

  • Multislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective ECG gating: reduction of radiation exposure by ECG-controlled tube current modulation.

    Tobias F. Jakobs;Christoph R. Becker;Bernd Ohnesorge;Thomas Flohr

  • Cardiac Imaging by Means of Electrocardiographically Gated Multisection Spiral CT: Initial Experience

    Bernd Ohnesorge;Thomas Flohr;Christoph Becker;Andreas F. Kopp

  • A Comparison of Paracentesis and Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunting in Patients with Ascites

    Martin Rössle;Andreas Ochs;Veit Gülberg;Volker Siegerstetter

  • Prefrontal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Changes Connectivity of Resting-State Networks during fMRI

    Daniel Keeser;Thomas Meindl;Julie Bor;Ulrich Palm

  • Dual-source CT cardiac imaging: initial experience.

    Thorsten R. C. Johnson;Konstantin Nikolaou;Bernd J. Wintersperger;Alexander W. Leber

  • Metal artifact reduction by dual energy computed tomography using monoenergetic extrapolation

    Fabian Bamberg;Alexander Dierks;Konstantin Nikolaou;Maximilian F. Reiser

  • ECG-gated reconstructed multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: effect of varying trigger delay on image quality.

    Cheng Hong;Christoph R. Becker;Armin Huber;U. Joseph Schoepf

  • Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study to Refine Management Recommendations for Women at Elevated Familial Risk of Breast Cancer: The EVA Trial

    Christiane Kuhl;Stefanie Weigel;Simone Schrading;Birke Arand

  • Subsegmental pulmonary emboli: improved detection with thin-collimation multi-detector row spiral CT.

    U. Joseph Schoepf;Nicolaus Holzknecht;Thomas K. Helmberger;Alexander Crispin

  • Enhancement of focal liver lesions at gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging: correlation with histopathologic findings and spiral CT--initial observations.

    Alexander Huppertz;Sibylle Haraida;Armin Kraus;Christoph J. Zech

  • Dual energy CT characterization of urinary calculi: initial in vitro and clinical experience.

    Anno Graser;Thorsten R. C. Johnson;Markus Bader;Michael Staehler

  • Dual-energy CT in patients suspected of having renal masses: can virtual nonenhanced images replace true nonenhanced images?

    Anno Graser;Thorsten R.C. Johnson;Elizabeth M. Hecht;Christoph R. Becker

  • Use of Neuroanatomical Pattern Classification to Identify Subjects in At-Risk Mental States of Psychosis and Predict Disease Transition

    Nikolaos Koutsouleris;Eva M. Meisenzahl;Christos Davatzikos;Ronald Bottlender

  • Association of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor Val66Met polymorphism with reduced hippocampal volumes in major depression.

    Thomas Frodl;Cornelius Schüle;Gisela Schmitt;Christine Born

Frequent Co-Authors

Konstantin Nikolaou
Konstantin Nikolaou University of Tübingen
Christoph R. Becker
Christoph R. Becker Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Stefan O. Schoenberg
Stefan O. Schoenberg Heidelberg University
Jürgen Debus
Jürgen Debus University Hospital Heidelberg
Birgit Ertl-Wagner
Birgit Ertl-Wagner University of Toronto
Thomas Meindl
Thomas Meindl Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Hans-Jürgen Möller
Hans-Jürgen Möller Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Harald Hampel
Harald Hampel Eisai (United States)
Franz Pfeiffer
Franz Pfeiffer Technical University of Munich
Christine Born
Christine Born Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering alternative pathways in the healthcare field, there are several flexible online degree options beyond a traditional MD. For those who want a patient-focused role but may not meet the most rigorous admission standards, you can explore easy nursing schools to get into. These programs often feature accessible entry requirements, helping more students launch nursing careers.

Interested in a non-clinical healthcare role? Consider a career in medical billing and coding. There are many reputable medical billing and coding schools online with financial aid, making it easier to gain these in-demand skills from home.

If standardized tests are a barrier for you, look for nursing school without teas test requirements. These programs can provide a smoother admission process while still offering robust training.

For a leadership position in the health sector, an best online healthcare administration degree can be completed quickly and prepares you for roles in management or operations. These alternatives open diverse doors in healthcare—many of which are accessible, affordable, and fully online.

Best Scientists Citing Maximilian F. Reiser

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles