World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Medicine
Switzerland
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
100
Citations
37395
World Ranking
8259
National Ranking
113

Hatem Alkadhi publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hatem Alkadhi sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 695 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Hatem Alkadhi D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hatem Alkadhi sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 100 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in Switzerland Leader Award

Overview

Hatem Alkadhi is affiliated with the University of Zurich in Switzerland and has contributed extensively to the fields of medicine and engineering, with a focus on radiology and biomedical engineering. Their work spans multiple subfields, particularly radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, biomedical engineering, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, surgery, and pulmonary and respiratory medicine.

The scientist has published nearly 500 papers in medicine and over 100 in engineering. Their research concentrates on topics including advanced X-ray and CT imaging, radiation dose and imaging, cardiac imaging and diagnostics, medical imaging techniques and applications, advanced MRI techniques and applications, cardiac valve diseases and treatments, and cardiovascular function and risk factors.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Hatem Alkadhi include Matthias Eberhard, Robert Manka, Victor Mergen, André Euler, and Thomas Sartoretti.

Their research has appeared primarily in the following publication venues:

  • Investigative Radiology
  • European Radiology
  • British Journal of Radiology
  • Radiology Cardiothoracic Imaging
  • Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Hatem Alkadhi include:

  • Radiomics in medical imaging-"how-to" guide and critical reflection (2020, Insights into Imaging)
  • Ultra-High-Resolution Coronary CT Angiography With Photon-Counting Detector CT (2022, Investigative Radiology)
  • High-Pitch Photon-Counting Detector Computed Tomography Angiography of the Aorta (2021, Investigative Radiology)
  • Quantum Iterative Reconstruction for Abdominal Photon-counting Detector CT Improves Image Quality (2022, Radiology)
  • Contrast-Enhanced Abdominal CT with Clinical Photon-Counting Detector CT: Assessment of Image Quality and Comparison with Energy-Integrating Detector CT (2021, Academic Radiology)

Best Publications

  • Localization of the motor hand area to a knob on the precentral gyrus. A new landmark.

    T A Yousry;U D Schmid;H Alkadhi;D Schmidt

  • Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience.

    Sebastian Leschka;Hatem Alkadhi;André Plass;Lotus Desbiolles

  • Radiomics in medical imaging-"how-to" guide and critical reflection.

    Janita E. van Timmeren;Davide Cester;Stephanie Tanadini-Lang;Hatem Alkadhi

  • Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: first experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control

    Hans Scheffel;Hatem Alkadhi;André Plass;Robert Vachenauer

  • A clinical prediction rule for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: validation, updating, and extension.

    Tessa S S Genders;Ewout W Steyerberg;Hatem Alkadhi;Sebastian Leschka

  • Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality.

    Sebastian Leschka;Simon Wildermuth;Thomas Boehm;Lotus Desbiolles

  • Multislice Computed Tomography in Infective Endocarditis: Comparison With Transesophageal Echocardiography and Intraoperative Findings

    Gudrun M. Feuchtner;Paul Stolzmann;Wolfgang Dichtl;Thomas Schertler

  • Low kilovoltage cardiac dual-source CT: attenuation, noise, and radiation dose

    Sebastian Leschka;Paul Stolzmann;Florian T. Schmid;Hans Scheffel

  • Prognostic value of multislice computed tomography and gated single-photon emission computed tomography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

    Jacob M. van Werkhoven;Joanne D. Schuijf;Oliver Gaemperli;J. Wouter Jukema

  • Low-dose CT coronary angiography in the step-and-shoot mode: diagnostic performance

    Hans Scheffel;Hatem Alkadhi;Sebastian Leschka;Andre Plass

  • Dual-source CT in step-and-shoot mode: noninvasive coronary angiography with low radiation dose.

    Paul Stolzmann;Sebastian Leschka;Hans Scheffel;Tobias Krauss

  • Raw data-based iterative reconstruction in body CTA: evaluation of radiation dose saving potential.

    Anna Winklehner;Christoph Karlo;Gilbert Puippe;Bernhard Schmidt

  • Prediction model to estimate presence of coronary artery disease: retrospective pooled analysis of existing cohorts

    Tessa S. S Genders;Ewout W Steyerberg;M. G. Myriam Hunink;M. G. Myriam Hunink;Koen Nieman

  • Dual-source CT coronary angiography: image quality, mean heart rate, and heart rate variability.

    David Matt;Hans Scheffel;Sebastian Leschka;Thomas G. Flohr

  • Cardiac Image Fusion from Stand-Alone SPECT and CT: Clinical Experience

    Oliver Gaemperli;Tiziano Schepis;Ines Valenta;Lars Husmann

  • Radiation dose estimates in dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography

    Paul Stolzmann;Hans Scheffel;Thomas Schertler;Thomas Frauenfelder

  • Ultralow-dose chest computed tomography for pulmonary nodule detection: first performance evaluation of single energy scanning with spectral shaping.

    Sonja Gordic;Fabian Morsbach;Bernhard Schmidt;Thomas Allmendinger

  • Endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: detection with dual-energy dual-source CT.

    Paul Stolzmann;Thomas Frauenfelder;Thomas Pfammatter;Nicole Peter

  • Low-dose, 128-slice, dual-source CT coronary angiography: accuracy and radiation dose of the high-pitch and the step-and-shoot mode

    Hatem Alkadhi;Paul Stolzmann;Lotus Desbiolles;Stephan Baumueller

  • Diagnostic accuracy of high-pitch dual-source CT for the assessment of coronary stenoses: first experience

    Sebastian Leschka;Paul Stolzmann;Lotus Desbiolles;Stephan Baumueller

Frequent Co-Authors

Borut Marincek
Borut Marincek University of Zurich
Philipp A. Kaufmann
Philipp A. Kaufmann University of Zurich
Oliver Gaemperli
Oliver Gaemperli University of Zurich
Volkmar Falk
Volkmar Falk Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Thomas Flohr
Thomas Flohr Siemens (Germany)
Spyros Kollias
Spyros Kollias University of Zurich
Philippe C. Cattin
Philippe C. Cattin University of Basel
Francesco Maisano
Francesco Maisano University of Zurich
Burkhardt Seifert
Burkhardt Seifert University of Zurich
Marie-Claude Hepp-Reymond
Marie-Claude Hepp-Reymond University of Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Medicine in the USA opens the door to a wide range of interdisciplinary healthcare careers. For those interested in healthcare leadership and management, a healthcare administration degree is an excellent choice, providing a foundation in both business principles and medical systems.

Registered nurses looking to advance their expertise and career opportunities can explore adn to msn bridge programs. These bridge programs are designed to streamline the process of earning a master's degree, allowing nurses to broaden their practice and leadership roles faster.

For those passionate about the role of nutrition in medicine and public health, pursuing an online dietitian degree can lead to rewarding careers in clinical, educational, or community settings.

Finally, professionals aiming for high-level administrative positions may benefit from enrolling in online mha programs, many of which carry CAHME accreditation to ensure quality and recognition in the field.

These diverse online pathways make advanced healthcare education accessible, offering flexibility and specialized training tailored to your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Hatem Alkadhi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles