World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
84
Citations
22965
World Ranking
15229
National Ranking
226

Borut Marincek publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Borut Marincek sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 285 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Borut Marincek D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Borut Marincek sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Borut Marincek is affiliated with the University of Zurich in Switzerland. Their academic profile does not currently document any recent papers, frequent co-authors, or recurring publication venues.

No specific main fields or subfields of study have been recorded for them. Similarly, there are no entries detailing main topics of work or book publications linked to their name.

There are no known awards or honors associated with Borut Marincek at this time.

The absence of these details suggests a limited public record of research output or academic collaborations accessible through available sources. This profile summarizes the verified information on their current academic affiliation and status.

Best Publications

  • Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience.

    Sebastian Leschka;Hatem Alkadhi;André Plass;Lotus Desbiolles

  • Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion in Coronary Artery Disease by Magnetic Resonance A Comparison With Positron Emission Tomography and Coronary Angiography

    J. Schwitter;D. Nanz;S. Kneifel;K. Bertschinger

  • Imaging techniques for assessment of inflammatory bowel disease: Joint ECCO and ESGAR evidence-based consensus guidelines

    J. Panes;Y. Bouhnik;W. Reinisch;J. Stoker

  • Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: first experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control

    Hans Scheffel;Hatem Alkadhi;André Plass;Robert Vachenauer

  • Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality.

    Sebastian Leschka;Simon Wildermuth;Thomas Boehm;Lotus Desbiolles

  • Low kilovoltage cardiac dual-source CT: attenuation, noise, and radiation dose

    Sebastian Leschka;Paul Stolzmann;Florian T. Schmid;Hans Scheffel

  • Low-dose CT coronary angiography in the step-and-shoot mode: diagnostic performance

    Hans Scheffel;Hatem Alkadhi;Sebastian Leschka;Andre Plass

  • Peripheral Neuropathies of the Median, Radial, and Ulnar Nerves: MR Imaging Features

    Gustav Andreisek;David W. Crook;Doris Burg;Borut Marincek

  • Dual-source CT in step-and-shoot mode: noninvasive coronary angiography with low radiation dose.

    Paul Stolzmann;Sebastian Leschka;Hans Scheffel;Tobias Krauss

  • Aortoiliac and lower extremity arteries assessed with 16-detector row CT angiography : prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography

    Jürgen K. Willmann;Bernhard Baumert;Thomas Schertler;Simon Wildermuth

  • Dual-source CT coronary angiography: image quality, mean heart rate, and heart rate variability.

    David Matt;Hans Scheffel;Sebastian Leschka;Thomas G. Flohr

  • Dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor performed with patient sitting in an open-magnet unit versus with patient supine in a closed-magnet unit.

    Katharina M Bertschinger;Frank H Hetzer;Justus E Roos;Karl Treiber

  • Radiation dose estimates in dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography

    Paul Stolzmann;Hans Scheffel;Thomas Schertler;Thomas Frauenfelder

  • Endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: detection with dual-energy dual-source CT.

    Paul Stolzmann;Thomas Frauenfelder;Thomas Pfammatter;Nicole Peter

  • Low-dose, 128-slice, dual-source CT coronary angiography: accuracy and radiation dose of the high-pitch and the step-and-shoot mode

    Hatem Alkadhi;Paul Stolzmann;Lotus Desbiolles;Stephan Baumueller

  • Aortoiliac and renal arteries: prospective intraindividual comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography and multi-detector row CT angiography.

    Jurgen K Willmann;Simon Wildermuth;Thomas Pfammatter;Justus E Roos

  • Diagnostic accuracy of high-pitch dual-source CT for the assessment of coronary stenoses: first experience

    Sebastian Leschka;Paul Stolzmann;Lotus Desbiolles;Stephan Baumueller

  • Preoperative breast cancer staging: MR imaging of the axilla with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide enhancement

    Sven C A Michel;Thomas M Keller;Johannes M Fröhlich;Daniel Fink

  • Malignant melanoma: staging with whole-body positron emission tomography and 2-[F-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose.

    H C Steinert;R A Huch Böni;A Buck;R Böni

  • Multidetector CT: detection of active hemorrhage in patients with blunt abdominal trauma.

    Jürgen K Willmann;Justus E Roos;Andreas Platz;Thomas Pfammatter

Frequent Co-Authors

Hatem Alkadhi
Hatem Alkadhi University of Zurich
Burkhardt Seifert
Burkhardt Seifert University of Zurich
Philipp A. Kaufmann
Philipp A. Kaufmann University of Zurich
Oliver Gaemperli
Oliver Gaemperli University of Zurich
Thomas Flohr
Thomas Flohr Siemens (Germany)
Volkmar Falk
Volkmar Falk Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Gustav K. von Schulthess
Gustav K. von Schulthess University of Zurich
Philippe C. Cattin
Philippe C. Cattin University of Basel
Thomas F. Lüscher
Thomas F. Lüscher University of Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medical education in the USA opens multiple online degree and career pathway options beyond traditional medical school. Those interested in patient care may consider pursuing nursing as a practical alternative. There are many cheapest online nursing program options, allowing students to begin or advance their healthcare careers without taking on excessive debt.

Nurses seeking higher-level roles or specialization can look into phd nursing education online. These advanced programs prepare graduates for roles in research, teaching, and leadership within healthcare settings.

Registered Nurses can expand their expertise, earning potential, and credentials by finding the cheapest online rn to bsn programs. These programs suit working nurses who wish to complete their bachelor’s degree with flexibility.

For those holding a non-nursing bachelor’s degree but wanting to transition into nursing, the non nursing bachelor's to msn online pathway offers a fast-track to becoming an advanced practice nurse. This is perfect for career changers looking to enter healthcare at a higher level.

Best Scientists Citing Borut Marincek

Recently Published Articles