World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 78 17793 16723 273 261 343 42678

Oliver Gaemperli publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Oliver Gaemperli between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Oliver Gaemperli published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 17.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 37 publications in 2017. 14 of the 356 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 37. Peak 37 publications in 2017. 2006: 10 publications 2007: 23 publications 2008: 20 publications 2009: 19 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 22 publications 2012: 26 publications 2013: 28 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 25 publications 2016: 26 publications 2017: 37 publications 2018: 34 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 5 publications
2006 2025

356 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Oliver Gaemperli: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 10
2007 23
2008 20
2009 19
2010 11
2011 22
2012 26
2013 28
2014 19
2015 25
2016 26
2017 37
2018 34
2019 17
2020 7
2021 5
2022 10
2023 3
2024 9
2025 5
Total 356
Download as CSV

Oliver Gaemperli publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oliver Gaemperli sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 341–360 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 343 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922 343
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Oliver Gaemperli D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oliver Gaemperli sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78–79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891 78
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Oliver Gaemperli is affiliated with the University of Zurich in Switzerland and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a focus on cardiac imaging and diagnostics.

Their research covers a range of subfields including radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, surgery, epidemiology, and biomedical engineering. The main topics of their work include:

  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
  • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
  • Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
  • Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications

Gaemperli has published in numerous journals, with frequent appearances in:

  • European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
  • European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
  • Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
  • Swiss Medical Weekly
  • European Heart Journal

Notable recent papers include:

  • "Role of cardiovascular imaging in cancer patients receiving cardiotoxic therapies: a position statement on behalf of the Heart Failure Association (HFA), the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) and the Cardio-Oncology Council of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)", 2020, European Journal of Heart Failure
  • "Procedural recommendations of cardiac PET/CT imaging: standardization in inflammatory-, infective-, infiltrative-, and innervation (4Is)-related cardiovascular diseases: a joint collaboration of the EACVI and the EANM", 2020, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
  • "Position paper of the EACVI and EANM on artificial intelligence applications in multimodality cardiovascular imaging using SPECT/CT, PET/CT, and cardiac CT", 2021, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
  • "Non-invasive imaging in coronary syndromes: recommendations of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography, in collaboration with the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance", 2021, European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
  • "Clinical applications of cardiac computed tomography: a consensus paper of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging-part II", 2021, European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging

Frequent collaborators in Gaemperli's research include Alessia Gimelli, Marc R. Dweck, Bernard Cosyns, Thor Edvardsen, and Antti Saraste. These coauthors have worked extensively alongside Gaemperli, contributing to a number of joint publications.

Best Publications

  • 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology.

    Gilles Montalescot;Udo Sechtem;Stephan Achenbach;Felicita Andreotti

  • 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases: Document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult. The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).

    Erbel R;Aboyans;Boileau C;Bossone E

  • 2017 ESC Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Diseases, in collaboration with the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) : Document covering atherosclerotic disease of extracranial carotid and vertebral, mesenteric, renal, upper and lower extremity arteries

    Victor Aboyans;J. B. Ricco;Marie-Louise E. L. Bartelink;Martin Björck

  • 2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS: The Task Force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS).

    Marco Valgimigli;Héctor Bueno;Robert A Byrne;Jean-Philippe Collet

  • 2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS

    Marco Valgimigli;Héctor Bueno;Robert A. Byrne;Jean-Philippe Collet

  • 2016 ESC Position Paper on cancer treatments and cardiovascular toxicity developed under the auspices of the ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines The Task Force for cancer treatments and cardiovascular toxicity of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)

    Jose Luis Zamorano;Patrizio Lancellotti;Daniel Rodriguez Munoz;Victor Aboyans

  • 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope.

    Michele Brignole;Angel Moya;Frederik J de Lange;Jean-Claude Deharo

  • Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: first experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control

    Hans Scheffel;Hatem Alkadhi;André Plass;Robert Vachenauer

  • Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating

    Lars Husmann;Ines Valenta;Oliver Gaemperli;Olivier Adda

  • Long-term prognostic value of 13N-ammonia myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography added value of coronary flow reserve.

    Bernhard A. Herzog;Lars Husmann;Ines Valenta;Oliver Gaemperli

  • Expert consensus for multi-modality imaging evaluation of cardiovascular complications of radiotherapy in adults: a report from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography.

    Patrizio Lancellotti;Vuyisile T. Nkomo;Luigi P. Badano;Jutta Bergler

  • Prognostic value of multislice computed tomography and gated single-photon emission computed tomography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

    Jacob M. van Werkhoven;Joanne D. Schuijf;Oliver Gaemperli;J. Wouter Jukema

  • Detection of significant coronary artery disease by noninvasive anatomical and functional imaging.

    Danilo Neglia;Daniele Rovai;Chiara Caselli;Mikko Pietila

  • Cardiac Image Fusion from Stand-Alone SPECT and CT: Clinical Experience

    Oliver Gaemperli;Tiziano Schepis;Ines Valenta;Lars Husmann

  • Imaging intraplaque inflammation in carotid atherosclerosis with 11C-PK11195 positron emission tomography/computed tomography

    Oliver Gaemperli;Joseph Shalhoub;David R.J. Owen;Frederic Lamare

  • Functionally Relevant Coronary Artery Disease : Comparison of 64-Section CT Angiography with Myocardial Perfusion SPECT

    Oliver Gaemperli;Tiziano Schepis;Ines Valenta;Pascal Koepfli

  • Coronary Artery Motion and Cardiac Phases: Dependency on Heart Rate—Implications for CT Image Reconstruction

    Lars Husmann;Sebastian Leschka;Lotus Desbiolles;Tiziano Schepis

  • Practical Instructions for the 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope

    Michele Brignole;Angel Moya;Frederik J de Lange;Jean-Claude Deharo

  • 2014 ESC Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Diseases

    Raimund Erbel;Victor Aboyans;Catherine Boileau;Eduardo Bossone

Frequent Co-Authors

Philipp A. Kaufmann
Philipp A. Kaufmann University of Zurich
Hatem Alkadhi
Hatem Alkadhi University of Zurich
Thomas F. Lüscher
Thomas F. Lüscher University of Zurich
Roberto Corti
Roberto Corti University of Zurich
Juhani Knuuti
Juhani Knuuti Turku University Hospital
Stephan Windecker
Stephan Windecker University of Bern
Patrizio Lancellotti
Patrizio Lancellotti University of Liège
Ulf Landmesser
Ulf Landmesser Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Borut Marincek
Borut Marincek University of Zurich
Jeroen J. Bax
Jeroen J. Bax Leiden University Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a future in Medicine doesn’t always mean attending traditional medical school. There are flexible, accredited online options that open doors to rewarding healthcare careers. For example, online nurse practitioner programs allow registered nurses to advance their qualifications and move into specialized, higher-paying positions—all while balancing work and family life.

If you’re seeking a cost-effective path to enter nursing, researching the cheapest bsn programs online can help you start your healthcare career with less financial strain. RNs who want to continue their education can explore the cheapest rn to bsn program online, building on their existing expertise and qualifying for more advanced roles.

For those drawn to leadership, education, or research, a phd in nursing can pave the way. This highest-level degree enables graduates to influence healthcare policy and practice, teach at universities, or direct clinical programs. Each pathway offers flexibility and strong career prospects, making online healthcare degrees an important consideration for future medical professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Oliver Gaemperli

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles