World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
78
Citations
42678
World Ranking
17794
National Ranking
273

Oliver Gaemperli publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oliver Gaemperli sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 343 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Oliver Gaemperli D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oliver Gaemperli sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Oliver Gaemperli is affiliated with the University of Zurich in Switzerland and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a focus on cardiac imaging and diagnostics.

Their research covers a range of subfields including radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, surgery, epidemiology, and biomedical engineering. The main topics of their work include:

  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
  • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
  • Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
  • Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications

Gaemperli has published in numerous journals, with frequent appearances in:

  • European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
  • European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
  • Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
  • Swiss Medical Weekly
  • European Heart Journal

Notable recent papers include:

  • "Role of cardiovascular imaging in cancer patients receiving cardiotoxic therapies: a position statement on behalf of the Heart Failure Association (HFA), the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) and the Cardio-Oncology Council of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)", 2020, European Journal of Heart Failure
  • "Procedural recommendations of cardiac PET/CT imaging: standardization in inflammatory-, infective-, infiltrative-, and innervation (4Is)-related cardiovascular diseases: a joint collaboration of the EACVI and the EANM", 2020, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
  • "Position paper of the EACVI and EANM on artificial intelligence applications in multimodality cardiovascular imaging using SPECT/CT, PET/CT, and cardiac CT", 2021, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
  • "Non-invasive imaging in coronary syndromes: recommendations of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography, in collaboration with the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance", 2021, European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
  • "Clinical applications of cardiac computed tomography: a consensus paper of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging-part II", 2021, European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging

Frequent collaborators in Gaemperli's research include Alessia Gimelli, Marc R. Dweck, Bernard Cosyns, Thor Edvardsen, and Antti Saraste. These coauthors have worked extensively alongside Gaemperli, contributing to a number of joint publications.

Best Publications

  • 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology.

    Gilles Montalescot;Udo Sechtem;Stephan Achenbach;Felicita Andreotti

  • 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases: Document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult. The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).

    Erbel R;Aboyans;Boileau C;Bossone E

  • 2017 ESC Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Diseases, in collaboration with the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) : Document covering atherosclerotic disease of extracranial carotid and vertebral, mesenteric, renal, upper and lower extremity arteries

    Victor Aboyans;J. B. Ricco;Marie-Louise E. L. Bartelink;Martin Björck

  • 2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS: The Task Force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS).

    Marco Valgimigli;Héctor Bueno;Robert A Byrne;Jean-Philippe Collet

  • 2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS

    Marco Valgimigli;Héctor Bueno;Robert A. Byrne;Jean-Philippe Collet

  • 2016 ESC Position Paper on cancer treatments and cardiovascular toxicity developed under the auspices of the ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines The Task Force for cancer treatments and cardiovascular toxicity of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)

    Jose Luis Zamorano;Patrizio Lancellotti;Daniel Rodriguez Munoz;Victor Aboyans

  • 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope.

    Michele Brignole;Angel Moya;Frederik J de Lange;Jean-Claude Deharo

  • Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: first experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control

    Hans Scheffel;Hatem Alkadhi;André Plass;Robert Vachenauer

  • Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating

    Lars Husmann;Ines Valenta;Oliver Gaemperli;Olivier Adda

  • Long-term prognostic value of 13N-ammonia myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography added value of coronary flow reserve.

    Bernhard A. Herzog;Lars Husmann;Ines Valenta;Oliver Gaemperli

  • Expert consensus for multi-modality imaging evaluation of cardiovascular complications of radiotherapy in adults: a report from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography.

    Patrizio Lancellotti;Vuyisile T. Nkomo;Luigi P. Badano;Jutta Bergler

  • Prognostic value of multislice computed tomography and gated single-photon emission computed tomography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

    Jacob M. van Werkhoven;Joanne D. Schuijf;Oliver Gaemperli;J. Wouter Jukema

  • Detection of significant coronary artery disease by noninvasive anatomical and functional imaging.

    Danilo Neglia;Daniele Rovai;Chiara Caselli;Mikko Pietila

  • Role of cardiovascular imaging in cancer patients receiving cardiotoxic therapies: a position statement on behalf of the Heart Failure Association (HFA), the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) and the Cardio-Oncology Council of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).

    Jelena Čelutkienė;Radek Pudil;Teresa López-Fernández;Julia Grapsa

  • Cardiac Image Fusion from Stand-Alone SPECT and CT: Clinical Experience

    Oliver Gaemperli;Tiziano Schepis;Ines Valenta;Lars Husmann

  • Imaging intraplaque inflammation in carotid atherosclerosis with 11C-PK11195 positron emission tomography/computed tomography

    Oliver Gaemperli;Joseph Shalhoub;David R.J. Owen;Frederic Lamare

  • Functionally Relevant Coronary Artery Disease : Comparison of 64-Section CT Angiography with Myocardial Perfusion SPECT

    Oliver Gaemperli;Tiziano Schepis;Ines Valenta;Pascal Koepfli

  • Coronary Artery Motion and Cardiac Phases: Dependency on Heart Rate—Implications for CT Image Reconstruction

    Lars Husmann;Sebastian Leschka;Lotus Desbiolles;Tiziano Schepis

  • Practical Instructions for the 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope

    Michele Brignole;Angel Moya;Frederik J de Lange;Jean-Claude Deharo

  • 2014 ESC Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Diseases

    Raimund Erbel;Victor Aboyans;Catherine Boileau;Eduardo Bossone

Frequent Co-Authors

Philipp A. Kaufmann
Philipp A. Kaufmann University of Zurich
Hatem Alkadhi
Hatem Alkadhi University of Zurich
Thomas F. Lüscher
Thomas F. Lüscher University of Zurich
Roberto Corti
Roberto Corti University of Zurich
Juhani Knuuti
Juhani Knuuti Turku University Hospital
Stephan Windecker
Stephan Windecker University of Bern
Patrizio Lancellotti
Patrizio Lancellotti University of Liège
Ulf Landmesser
Ulf Landmesser Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Borut Marincek
Borut Marincek University of Zurich
Jeroen J. Bax
Jeroen J. Bax Leiden University Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a future in Medicine doesn’t always mean attending traditional medical school. There are flexible, accredited online options that open doors to rewarding healthcare careers. For example, online nurse practitioner programs allow registered nurses to advance their qualifications and move into specialized, higher-paying positions—all while balancing work and family life.

If you’re seeking a cost-effective path to enter nursing, researching the cheapest bsn programs online can help you start your healthcare career with less financial strain. RNs who want to continue their education can explore the cheapest rn to bsn program online, building on their existing expertise and qualifying for more advanced roles.

For those drawn to leadership, education, or research, a phd in nursing can pave the way. This highest-level degree enables graduates to influence healthcare policy and practice, teach at universities, or direct clinical programs. Each pathway offers flexibility and strong career prospects, making online healthcare degrees an important consideration for future medical professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Oliver Gaemperli

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles