World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Philipp A. Kaufmann

Philipp A. Kaufmann

Award Badge
Medicine
Switzerland
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 107 6194 5828 84 82 723 46642

Philipp A. Kaufmann publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Philipp A. Kaufmann between 1992 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Philipp A. Kaufmann published across 35 years, from 1992 to 2026, averaging 23.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 64 publications in 2011. 31 of the 820 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 64. Peak 64 publications in 2011. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 11 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 18 publications 2006: 22 publications 2007: 35 publications 2008: 44 publications 2009: 32 publications 2010: 33 publications 2011: 64 publications 2012: 35 publications 2013: 36 publications 2014: 33 publications 2015: 33 publications 2016: 35 publications 2017: 35 publications 2018: 39 publications 2019: 40 publications 2020: 54 publications 2021: 39 publications 2022: 37 publications 2023: 22 publications 2024: 30 publications 2025: 30 publications 2026: 1 publication
1992 2026

820 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Philipp A. Kaufmann: publications per year, 1992 to 2026
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 0
1994 0
1995 4
1996 6
1997 7
1998 11
1999 7
2000 8
2001 5
2002 5
2003 8
2004 11
2005 18
2006 22
2007 35
2008 44
2009 32
2010 33
2011 64
2012 35
2013 36
2014 33
2015 33
2016 35
2017 35
2018 39
2019 40
2020 54
2021 39
2022 37
2023 22
2024 30
2025 30
2026 1
Total 820
Download as CSV

Philipp A. Kaufmann publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philipp A. Kaufmann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 721–740 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 723 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259 723
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Philipp A. Kaufmann D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philipp A. Kaufmann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 106–107 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 107 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541 107
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in Switzerland Leader Award

Overview

Philipp A. Kaufmann is affiliated with the University of Zurich in Switzerland and has a research focus primarily within the field of Medicine, contributing significantly to Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

Their work extensively covers topics such as Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics, Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging, Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications, Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications, Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics, Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity, and Acute Myocardial Infarction Research.

Frequent publication venues for Philipp A. Kaufmann include:

  • European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
  • European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
  • JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging
  • European Heart Journal

Some of their recent published papers are:

  • "Validation of deep-learning image reconstruction for coronary computed tomography angiography: Impact on noise, image quality and diagnostic accuracy" (2020) in Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography
  • "Myocardial Perfusion PET for the Detection and Reporting of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction" (2023) in JACC. Cardiovascular imaging
  • "Clinical Deployment of Explainable Artificial Intelligence of SPECT for Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease" (2021) in JACC. Cardiovascular imaging
  • "When Does a Calcium Score Equate to Secondary Prevention?" (2023) in JACC. Cardiovascular imaging
  • "Clinical risk factors and atherosclerotic plaque extent to define risk for major events in patients without obstructive coronary artery disease: the long-term coronary computed tomography angiography CONFIRM registry" (2020) in European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging

Frequent co-authors in Philipp A. Kaufmann's publications include:

  • Ronny R. Buechel
  • Aju P. Pazhenkottil
  • Andreas A. Giannopoulos
  • Cathérine Gebhard
  • Dominik C. Benz

Best Publications

  • Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation: the Task Force on the Management of ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology.

    Frans Van de Werf;Jeroen Bax;Amadeo Betriu;Carina Blomstrom-Lundqvist

  • Echocardiographic and pathoanatomical characteristics of isolated left ventricular non-compaction: a step towards classification as a distinct cardiomyopathy

    R Jenni;E Oechslin;J Schneider;C Attenhofer Jost

  • Long-term follow-up of 34 adults with isolated left ventricular noncompaction: a distinct cardiomyopathy with poor prognosis

    Erwin N Oechslin;Christine H Attenhofer Jost;Jerry R Rojas;Philipp A Kaufmann

  • Standardization of left atrial, right ventricular, and right atrial deformation imaging using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography: a consensus document of the EACVI/ASE/Industry Task Force to standardize deformation imaging.

    Luigi P. Badano;Theodore J. Kolias;Denisa Muraru;Theodore P. Abraham

  • Age- and sex-related differences in all-cause mortality risk based on coronary computed tomography angiography findings results from the International Multicenter CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: An International Multicenter Registry) of 23,854 patients without known coronary artery disease.

    James K. Min;Allison Dunning;Fay Y. Lin;Stephan Achenbach

  • Cardiac computed tomography: Indications, applications, limitations, and training requirements - Report of a Writing Group deployed by the Working Group Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac CT of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology

    Stephen Schroeder;Stephan Achenbach;Frank Bengel;Christof Burgstahler

  • Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: first experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control

    Hans Scheffel;Hatem Alkadhi;André Plass;Robert Vachenauer

  • Anatomic versus physiologic assessment of coronary artery disease. Role of coronary flow reserve, fractional flow reserve, and positron emission tomography imaging in revascularization decision-making.

    K. Lance Gould;Nils P. Johnson;Timothy M. Bateman;Rob S. Beanlands

  • Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating

    Lars Husmann;Ines Valenta;Oliver Gaemperli;Olivier Adda

  • How to diagnose diastolic heart failure

    Wj Paulus;Dl Brutsaert;Thierry Gillebert;Fe Rademakers

  • Machine learning for prediction of all-cause mortality in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a 5-year multicentre prospective registry analysis.

    Manish Motwani;Damini Dey;Daniel S. Berman;Guido Germano

  • Long-term prognostic value of 13N-ammonia myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography added value of coronary flow reserve.

    Bernhard A. Herzog;Lars Husmann;Ines Valenta;Oliver Gaemperli

  • Prevalence and severity of coronary artery disease and adverse events among symptomatic patients with coronary artery calcification scores of zero undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography: results from the CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: An International Multicenter) registry.

    Todd C. Villines;Edward A. Hulten;Leslee J. Shaw;Manju Goyal

  • Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality.

    Sebastian Leschka;Simon Wildermuth;Thomas Boehm;Lotus Desbiolles

  • Isolated ventricular noncompaction is associated with coronary microcirculatory dysfunction

    Rolf Jenni;Christophe A Wyss;Erwin N Oechslin;Philipp A Kaufmann

  • Heterogeneity of resting and hyperemic myocardial blood flow in healthy humans.

    Panithaya Chareonthaitawee;Philipp A. Kaufmann;Ornella Rimoldi;Paolo G. Camici

  • Performance of the Traditional Age, Sex, and Angina Typicality–Based Approach for Estimating Pretest Probability of Angiographically Significant Coronary Artery Disease in Patients Undergoing Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography Results From the Multinational Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: An International Multicenter Registry (CONFIRM)

    Victor Y. Cheng;Daniel S. Berman;Alan Rozanski;Allison M. Dunning

  • Prognostic value of multislice computed tomography and gated single-photon emission computed tomography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

    Jacob M. van Werkhoven;Joanne D. Schuijf;Oliver Gaemperli;J. Wouter Jukema

  • Myocardial blood flow measurement by PET: technical aspects and clinical applications.

    Philipp A. Kaufmann;Paolo G. Camici

  • Detection of significant coronary artery disease by noninvasive anatomical and functional imaging.

    Danilo Neglia;Daniele Rovai;Chiara Caselli;Mikko Pietila

Frequent Co-Authors

Oliver Gaemperli
Oliver Gaemperli University of Zurich
Daniel S. Berman
Daniel S. Berman Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
James K. Min
James K. Min NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital
Stephan Achenbach
Stephan Achenbach University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Mouaz H. Al-Mallah
Mouaz H. Al-Mallah Houston Methodist
Matthew J. Budoff
Matthew J. Budoff UCLA Medical Center
Filippo Cademartiri
Filippo Cademartiri Fondazione Monasterio
Leslee J. Shaw
Leslee J. Shaw Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Hatem Alkadhi
Hatem Alkadhi University of Zurich
Jonathon Leipsic
Jonathon Leipsic University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a medical career in the USA doesn't always mean following a traditional MD path. Many professionals are exploring alternative online degrees that align with healthcare trends and demands. Programs like the shortest pmhnp program now allow nurses to specialize in psychiatric mental health—an area of increasing need—via streamlined online study.

For those interested in the business side of medicine, an online health management degree provides essential knowledge in operations, policy, and administration. Students can further advance with online mha programs affordable to gain a master’s level understanding of healthcare systems, leadership, and strategy.

Nurses aiming for the highest qualification can consider the best dnp programs online, opening doors to advanced clinical or leadership roles. Overall, flexible and affordable online programs make it easier than ever to access specialized medical education and diverse career pathways in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Philipp A. Kaufmann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles