World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 92 866 758 550 470 208 45617

Harold Pashler publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Harold Pashler between 1984 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Harold Pashler published across 39 years, from 1984 to 2022, averaging 5.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2007. 4 of the 212 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2007. 1984: 2 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 2 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 3 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 2 publications
1984 2022

212 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Harold Pashler: publications per year, 1984 to 2022
Year Publications
1984 2
1985 1
1986 1
1987 2
1988 2
1989 2
1990 3
1991 3
1992 5
1993 4
1994 8
1995 6
1996 1
1997 3
1998 2
1999 3
2000 8
2001 10
2002 6
2003 4
2004 9
2005 7
2006 8
2007 14
2008 10
2009 8
2010 13
2011 5
2012 9
2013 12
2014 7
2015 5
2016 10
2017 4
2018 3
2019 5
2020 3
2021 2
2022 2
Total 212
Download as CSV

Harold Pashler publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Harold Pashler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 201–210 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 208 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328 208
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Harold Pashler D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Harold Pashler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 92–93 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70 92
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1999 - Troland Research Awards, United States National Academy of Sciences For his many experimental breakthroughs in the study of spatial attention and central executive control and for his insightful theoretical analysis of human cognitive architecture.

Overview

Harold Pashler is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on social sciences with specific attention to developmental and educational psychology, sociology and political science, cultural studies, management science and operations research, and artificial intelligence.

The scientist's recent papers cover various aspects of experimental psychology and social science topics. These publications include:

  • Mitigating cue competition effects in human category learning, 2020, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
  • The tainted altruism effect: a successful pre-registered replication, 2022, Royal Society Open Science
  • A Train Wreck by Any Other Name, 2021, Psychological Inquiry
  • Statistical consequences of staging exploration and confirmation, 2021, Methods in Psychology

Frequent co-authors contributing alongside Harold Pashler include:

  • Christine R. Harris
  • Jonas Sin-Heng Lau
  • Michael Casale
  • V.S. Chua Alcala
  • Kendra Johnson

The scientist's works have been published in several notable venues such as:

  • Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
  • Royal Society Open Science
  • Psychological Inquiry
  • Methods in Psychology

Harold Pashler's main fields of study encompass social sciences, with subfields including developmental and educational psychology, sociology and political science, cultural studies, management science and operations research, and artificial intelligence.

The key research topics that form the basis of their scientific inquiry involve:

  • Child and animal learning development
  • Language and cultural evolution
  • Reading and literacy development
  • Evolutionary game theory and cooperation
  • Crime, deviance, and social control
  • Forecasting techniques and applications
  • Bayesian modeling and causal inference

In recognition of their contributions to psychology, Harold Pashler was awarded the Troland Research Award by the United States National Academy of Sciences in 1999. The award citation highlights their experimental breakthroughs in the study of spatial attention and central executive control as well as their theoretical analysis of human cognitive architecture.

Best Publications

  • Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory.

    Harold Pashler

  • Learning Styles: Concepts and Evidence

    Harold Pashler;Mark McDaniel;Doug Rohrer;Robert Bjork

  • The Psychology of Attention

    Harold E. Pashler

  • Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis.

    Nicholas J. Cepeda;Harold Pashler;Edward Vul;John T. Wixted

  • Puzzlingly high correlations in fMRI studies of emotion, personality, and social cognition.

    Edward Vul;Christine Harris;Piotr Winkielman;Harold Pashler

  • Editors' Introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science: A Crisis of Confidence?

    Harold Pashler;Eric–Jan Wagenmakers

  • Familiarity and visual change detection.

    Harold Pashler

  • How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing.

    Seth Roberts;Harold Pashler

  • Spacing Effects in Learning A Temporal Ridgeline of Optimal Retention

    Nicholas J. Cepeda;Nicholas J. Cepeda;Edward Vul;Edward Vul;Doug Rohrer;John T. Wixted

  • Is the Replicability Crisis Overblown? Three Arguments Examined:

    Harold Pashler;Christine R. Harris

  • The influence of retrieval on retention

    Mark Carrier;Harold Pashler

  • Processing stages in overlapping tasks: evidence for a central bottleneck.

    Harold Pashler

  • Organizing Instruction and Study to Improve Student Learning. IES Practice Guide. NCER 2007-2004.

    Harold Pashler;Patrice M. Bain;Brian A. Bottge;Arthur Graesser

  • Chronometric evidence for central postponement in temporally overlapping tasks

    Harold Pashler;James C. Johnston

  • Using Spacing to Enhance Diverse Forms of Learning: Review of Recent Research and Implications for Instruction

    Shana K. Carpenter;Nicholas J. Cepeda;Doug Rohrer;Sean H. K. Kang

  • When Does Feedback Facilitate Learning of Words

    Harold Pashler;Nicholas J. Cepeda;John T. Wixted;Doug Rohrer

  • Attentional limitations in dual-task performance.

    Harold Pashler;James C. Johnston

  • Improvement in line orientation discrimination is retinally local but dependent on cognitive set

    Ling-Po Shiu;Harold Pashler

  • Measuring the Crowd Within: Probabilistic Representations Within Individuals

    Edward Vul;Harold E Pashler

  • Attention and Performance

    Harold Pashler;James C. Johnston;Eric Ruthruff

Frequent Co-Authors

Doug Rohrer
Doug Rohrer University of South Florida
Michael C. Mozer
Michael C. Mozer Google (United States)
Christine R. Harris
Christine R. Harris University of California, San Diego
Edward Vul
Edward Vul University of California, San Diego
Shana K. Carpenter
Shana K. Carpenter Oregon State University
John T. Wixted
John T. Wixted University of California, San Diego
Eric Ruthruff
Eric Ruthruff University of New Mexico
James C. Johnston
James C. Johnston Ames Research Center
Mark A. McDaniel
Mark A. McDaniel Washington University in St. Louis
Roger W. Remington
Roger W. Remington University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens up diverse career pathways, especially in the growing field of mental health counseling. Many universities in the USA now offer online psychology degrees, making it easier for students nationwide to get started on their career journey.

Requirements for becoming a mental health counselor can vary by state and city, so it’s important to understand local expectations. If you are interested in working in Nevada, you should review the Reno mental health counselor education requirements. Those considering a career in Virginia should look at the mental health counselor requirements in Richmond to determine the necessary steps.

In California, there are different local regulations. For example, take a look at how to become a mental health counselor in Riverside, or learn about how to become a mental health counselor in Sacramento. Each city has its own licensing and educational standards, so researching your preferred location will help you plan your academic and professional future efficiently.

Best Scientists Citing Harold Pashler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles