World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Katherine A. Rawson

Katherine A. Rawson

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
48
Citations
13586
World Ranking
5823
National Ranking
3158

Katherine A. Rawson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Katherine A. Rawson sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 129 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Katherine A. Rawson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Katherine A. Rawson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Katherine A. Rawson is a researcher affiliated with Kent State University in the United States. Their work primarily intersects the fields of Psychology and Neuroscience, with specific emphasis on Cognitive Neuroscience and Developmental and Educational Psychology. Their research also includes contributions to Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Education.

Their scholarly interests concentrate on topics such as Memory Processes and Influences, Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning, Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes, Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods, Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism, Educational Strategies and Epistemologies, and Science Education and Pedagogy.

They have contributed to various academic journals, frequently publishing in venues including:

  • Educational Psychology Review
  • Current Directions in Psychological Science
  • Cognition
  • Topics in Language Disorders
  • Learning and Instruction

Some of their recent papers include:

  • Successive Relearning: An Underexplored but Potent Technique for Obtaining and Maintaining Knowledge (2022) published in Current Directions in Psychological Science
  • The Role of Effort in Understanding Educational Achievement: Objective Effort as an Explanatory Construct Versus Effort as a Student Perception (2020) published in Educational Psychology Review
  • A Review of the Application of Distributed Practice Principles to Naming Treatment in Aphasia (2020) published in Topics in Language Disorders
  • Effects of distributed practice and criterion level on word retrieval in aphasia (2020) published in Cognition
  • How much do college students with ADHD benefit from retrieval practice when learning key-term definitions? (2020) published in Learning and Instruction

Their frequent collaborators include John Dunlosky, Sabrina Badali, Erica L. Middleton, Julia Schuchard, and Jessica L. Janes.

Best Publications

  • Improving Students’ Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology

    John Dunlosky;Katherine A. Rawson;Elizabeth J. Marsh;Mitchell J. Nathan

  • Category Norms: An Updated and Expanded Version of the Battig and Montague (1969) Norms.

    James P Van Overschelde;Katherine A Rawson;John Dunlosky

  • Testing the retrieval effort hypothesis: Does greater difficulty correctly recalling information lead to higher levels of memory?

    Mary A. Pyc;Katherine A. Rawson

  • Overconfidence produces underachievement: Inaccurate self evaluations undermine students’ learning and retention

    John Dunlosky;Katherine A. Rawson

  • Why Testing Improves Memory: Mediator Effectiveness Hypothesis

    Mary A. Pyc;Katherine A. Rawson

  • Optimizing schedules of retrieval practice for durable and efficient learning: how much is enough?

    Katherine A. Rawson;John Dunlosky

  • The what, how much, and when of study strategies: comparing intended versus actual study behaviour.

    Rachael N Blasiman;John Dunlosky;Katherine A Rawson

  • Rereading Effects Depend on Time of Test.

    Katherine A. Rawson;Walter Kintsch

  • The rereading effect: metacomprehension accuracy improves across reading trials.

    Katherine A. Rawson;John Dunlosky;Keith W. Thiede

  • What constrains the accuracy of metacomprehension judgments? Testing the transfer-appropriate-monitoring and accessibility hypotheses

    John Dunlosky;Katherine A. Rawson;Erica L. Middleton

  • The METER: a brief, self-administered measure of health literacy.

    Katherine A. Rawson;John Gunstad;John Gunstad;Joel Hughes;Joel Hughes;Mary Beth Spitznagel;Mary Beth Spitznagel

  • How and when do students use flashcards

    Kathryn T. Wissman;Katherine A. Rawson;Mary A. Pyc

  • The Power of Successive Relearning: Improving Performance on Course Exams and Long-Term Retention

    Katherine A. Rawson;John Dunlosky;Sharon M. Sciartelli

  • The interim test effect: Testing prior material can facilitate the learning of new material

    Kathryn T. Wissman;Katherine A. Rawson;Mary A. Pyc;Mary A. Pyc

  • Are performance predictions for text based on ease of processing

    Katherine A. Rawson;John Dunlosky

  • Comprehension and Situation Awareness

    Francis T. Durso;Katherine A. Rawson;Sara Girotto

  • Improving students’ self-evaluation of learning for key concepts in textbook materials

    Katherine A. Rawson;John Dunlosky

  • Why is test-restudy practice beneficial for memory? An evaluation of the mediator shift hypothesis.

    Mary A. Pyc;Katherine A. Rawson

  • General knowledge norms: Updated and expanded from the Nelson and Narens (1980) norms

    Sarah K. Tauber;John Dunlosky;Katherine A. Rawson;Matthew G. Rhodes

  • Examining the efficiency of schedules of distributed retrieval practice.

    Mary A. Pyc;Katherine A. Rawson

  • The Cambridge Handbook of Cognition and Education

    John Dunlosky;Katherine A. Rawson

Frequent Co-Authors

John Dunlosky
John Dunlosky Kent State University
Joel W. Hughes
Joel W. Hughes Kent State University
Walter Kintsch
Walter Kintsch University of Colorado Boulder
John Gunstad
John Gunstad Kent State University
R. Reed Hunt
R. Reed Hunt University of Mississippi
Mary Beth Spitznagel
Mary Beth Spitznagel Kent State University
Elizabeth J. Marsh
Elizabeth J. Marsh Duke University
Larry L. Jacoby
Larry L. Jacoby Washington University in St. Louis
Reid Hastie
Reid Hastie University of Chicago
Christopher Hertzog
Christopher Hertzog Georgia Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study psychology in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degrees and rewarding career pathways. Many students pursue postgraduate degrees in counseling, clinical psychology, or social work—fields that often require state licensure for professional practice.

Becoming a licensed counselor is a popular goal, but each state sets its own requirements. For instance, the lpc licensure requirements in New York emphasize specific educational credentials and supervised practice hours. If you’re considering North Carolina, know that the North Carolina licensed professional counselor requirements focus on graduate degrees and comprehensive examinations.

Similarly, to practice in North Dakota, review the lpc license requirements in North Dakota, which highlight coursework and practical training. Meanwhile, those interested in working in Ohio must meet the lpc licensure requirements in Ohio, which also include background checks and continuing education.

When choosing your degree or career pathway, always review your state’s licensure requirements. This ensures a smooth transition from studying psychology to a meaningful professional role.

Best Scientists Citing Katherine A. Rawson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles