World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 78 1592 1425 88 83 236 21560

Tamara van Gog publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tamara van Gog between 1976 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tamara van Gog published across 50 years, from 1976 to 2025, averaging 5.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2014. 19 of the 277 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2014. 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 18 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 21 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 6 publications
1976 2025

277 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tamara van Gog: publications per year, 1976 to 2025
Year Publications
1976 1
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 2
2005 3
2006 5
2007 4
2008 9
2009 18
2010 15
2011 9
2012 12
2013 20
2014 21
2015 14
2016 14
2017 14
2018 17
2019 20
2020 18
2021 19
2022 12
2023 11
2024 13
2025 6
Total 277
Download as CSV

Tamara van Gog publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tamara van Gog sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 231–240 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 236 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226 236
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Tamara van Gog D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tamara van Gog sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78–79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137 78
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Tamara van Gog is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands and works primarily in the field of Psychology. Their research focuses on multiple subfields, including Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Education, Artificial Intelligence, and Social Psychology.

The main topics covered by their work include:

  • Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Education and Critical Thinking Development
  • Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
  • Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

Van Gog has contributed extensively to academic literature, with a significant number of publications appearing in these venues:

  • Educational Psychology Review
  • Learning and Instruction
  • Applied Cognitive Psychology
  • Instructional Science
  • Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

Among their recent publications are:

  • "The Role of Mental Effort in Fostering Self-Regulated Learning with Problem-Solving Tasks" (2020, Educational Psychology Review)
  • "Teachers' Emotional Exhaustion: Associations With Their Typical Use of and Implicit Attitudes Toward Emotion Regulation Strategies" (2020, Frontiers in Psychology)
  • "Learning-by-Teaching Without Audience Presence or Interaction: When and Why Does it Work?" (2021, Educational Psychology Review)
  • "Observational, student, and teacher perspectives on interpersonal teacher behavior: Shared and unique associations with teacher and student emotions" (2020, Learning and Instruction)
  • "Enhancing students' critical thinking skills: is comparing correct and erroneous examples beneficial?" (2021, Instructional Science)

Van Gog frequently collaborates with other researchers, including Janneke van de Pol, Eva M. Janssen, Peter P. J. L. Verkoeijen, Ellen M. Kok, and Vincent Hoogerheide.

Best Publications

  • Development of an instrument for measuring different types of cognitive load

    Jimmie Leppink;Fred Paas;Fred Paas;Cees P. M. Van der Vleuten;Tamara Van Gog

  • Using Electroencephalography to Measure Cognitive Load

    Pavlo Antonenko;Fred Paas;Fred Paas;Roland Grabner;Tamara van Gog

  • Problem-based learning is compatible with human cognitive architecture: Commentary on Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006).

    Henk G. Schmidt;Sofie M. M. Loyens;Tamara Van Gog;Fred Paas

  • Cognitive Load Theory: New Conceptualizations, Specifications, and Integrated Research Perspectives

    Fred Paas;Fred Paas;Tamara van Gog;John Sweller

  • Instructional Efficiency: Revisiting the Original Construct in Educational Research.

    Tamara Van Gog;Fred Paas

  • Effects of pairs of problems and examples on task performance and different types of cognitive load

    Jimmie Leppink;Fred Paas;Fred Paas;Tamara van Gog;Cees P.M. van der Vleuten

  • Eye tracking as a tool to study and enhance multimedia learning

    Tamara van Gog;Katharina Scheiter

  • In the eyes of the beholder: How experts and novices interpret dynamic stimuli

    Halszka Jarodzka;Katharina Scheiter;Peter Gerjets;Tamara van Gog

  • Example-Based Learning: Integrating Cognitive and Social-Cognitive Research Perspectives

    Tamara van Gog;Nikol Rummel;Nikol Rummel

  • Uncovering the Problem-Solving Process: Cued Retrospective Reporting Versus Concurrent and Retrospective Reporting.

    Tamara van Gog;Fred Paas;Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer;Puk Witte

  • Effect of Availability Bias and Reflective Reasoning on Diagnostic Accuracy Among Internal Medicine Residents

    Sílvia Mamede;Tamara van Gog;Kees van den Berge;Remy M. J. P. Rikers

  • Training self-assessment and task-selection skills: A cognitive approach to improving self-regulated learning

    Danny Kostons;Tamara van Gog;Fred Paas;Fred Paas

  • The Mirror Neuron System and Observational Learning: Implications for the Effectiveness of Dynamic Visualizations

    Tamara van Gog;Fred Paas;Fred Paas;Nadine Marcus;Paul Ayres

  • Effects of worked examples, example-problem, and problem-example pairs on novices’ learning

    Tamara van Gog;Tamara van Gog;Liesbeth Kester;Fred Paas;Fred Paas

  • Effects of prior knowledge and concept-map structure on disorientation, cognitive load, and learning

    Franck Amadieu;Tamara van Gog;Fred Paas;Fred Paas;André Tricot

  • Optimising worked example instruction: Different ways to increase germane cognitive load.

    Fred Paas;Fred Paas;Tamara van Gog

  • Instructional Design for Advanced Learners: Establishing Connections between the Theoretical Frameworks of Cognitive Load and Deliberate Practice

    Tamara van Gog;K. Anders Ericsson;Remy M. J. P. Rikers;Fred Paas

  • Reflection prompts and tutor feedback in a web-based learning environment: effects on students' self-regulated learning competence

    Gerard van den Boom;Fred Paas;Jeroen J.G. van Merriënboer;Tamara van Gog

  • Effects of Process-Oriented Worked Examples on Troubleshooting Transfer Performance

    Tamara van Gog;Fred Paas;Fred Paas;Jeroen J.G. van Merriënboer

  • Process-Oriented Worked Examples: Improving Transfer Performance Through Enhanced Understanding

    Tamara van Gog;Fred Paas;Jeroen J.G. van Merriënboer

Frequent Co-Authors

Fred Paas
Fred Paas Erasmus University Rotterdam
Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer
Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer Maastricht University
Anique B. H. de Bruin
Anique B. H. de Bruin Maastricht University
Katharina Scheiter
Katharina Scheiter University of Potsdam
Rolf A. Zwaan
Rolf A. Zwaan Erasmus University Rotterdam
Henk G. Schmidt
Henk G. Schmidt Erasmus University Rotterdam
Remy M. J. P. Rikers
Remy M. J. P. Rikers Utrecht University
Liesbeth Kester
Liesbeth Kester Utrecht University
Nikol Rummel
Nikol Rummel Ruhr University Bochum
Tim Mainhard
Tim Mainhard Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens diverse pathways beyond traditional clinical roles. Among the fastest-growing specializations is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), an expert who supports individuals dealing with behavioral challenges. Many aspiring professionals research requirements in their area, such as becoming a bcba in Fort Wayne, which involves earning a relevant degree, completing supervised fieldwork, and passing the BCBA examination.

Requirements may differ by location. If you're interested in bcba certification requirements in Fort Worth, for instance, you may find variations in supervision hours and internship opportunities. Similarly, researching Fremont bcba requirements or becoming a bcba in Fresno can help you tailor your academic path and clinical experiences to fit local job markets.

Online degrees in psychology and applied behavior analysis are viable options for those needing flexibility. These programs often include coursework and supervised practicum placements essential for BCBA certification. Pursuing a specialized online degree can accelerate your entry into rewarding career pathways in mental and behavioral health.

Best Scientists Citing Tamara van Gog

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles