World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
78
Citations
56634
World Ranking
17781
National Ranking
8872

Sidney J. Winawer publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sidney J. Winawer sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 351 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Sidney J. Winawer D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sidney J. Winawer sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

Sidney J. Winawer is affiliated with Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with significant contributions in oncology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, surgery, pathology and forensic medicine, and epidemiology. The scientist's work spans numerous topics related to colorectal and gastric cancers, genetic factors, global cancer incidence and screening, and related gastrointestinal diseases.

The main topics of their research include:

  • Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
  • Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
  • Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
  • Diverticular Disease and Complications
  • Microscopic Colitis

Sidney J. Winawer has published extensively, with recent notable papers such as:

  • "Actin cytoskeletal organization loss in the benign-to-malignant tumor transition in cultured human colonic epithelial cells," 2024, published in PubMed
  • "An efficient strategy for evaluating new non-invasive screening tests for colorectal cancer: the guiding principles," 2023, published in Gut
  • "Decreased colorectal cancer incidence and mortality in a diverse urban population with increased colonoscopy screening," 2021, published in BMC Public Health
  • "Randomized Trial of Facilitated Adherence to Screening Colonoscopy vs Sequential Fecal-Based Blood Test," 2023, published in Gastroenterology
  • "The National Polyp Study at 40: challenges then and now," 2020, published in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Key frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Sidney J. Winawer include:

  • Ann G. Zauber
  • Michael J. O'Brien
  • Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
  • Anne I. Hahn
  • Timothy R. Church

The scientist has contributed to prominent publication venues, including:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
  • The American Journal of Gastroenterology
  • UNC Libraries
  • Gut

Among the distinctions, Sidney J. Winawer is recognized as a Member of the Association of American Physicians. The scientist remains an active contributor to the advancement of knowledge in cancer screening, detection, and gastrointestinal medicine.

Best Publications

  • Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.

    S J Winawer;A G Zauber;M N Ho;M J O'Brien

  • Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: A consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society

    Sidney J. Winawer;Ann G. Zauber;Robert H. Fletcher;Jonathon S. Stillman

  • Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology.

    Bernard Levin;David A Lieberman;Beth McFarland;Kimberly S Andrews

  • Colonoscopic Polypectomy and Long-Term Prevention of Colorectal-Cancer Deaths

    Ann G. Zauber;Sidney J. Winawer;Michael J. O'Brien;Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar

  • COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING AND SURVEILLANCE: CLINICAL GUIDELINES AND RATIONALE-UPDATE BASED ON NEW EVIDENCE

    Sidney Winawer;Robert Fletcher;Douglas Rex;John Bond

  • Colorectal cancer screening: Clinical guidelines and rationale

    SJ Winawer;RH Fletcher;L Miller;F Godlee

  • Screening and Surveillance for the Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer and Adenomatous Polyps, 2008: A Joint Guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi‐Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology*†

    Bernard Levin;David A. Lieberman;Beth McFarland;Robert A. Smith

  • Guidelines for Colonoscopy Surveillance After Screening and Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer

    David A. Lieberman;Douglas K. Rex;Sidney J. Winawer;Francis M. Giardiello

  • Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: Recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer

    Douglas K. Rex;John H. Bond;Sidney Winawer;Theodore R. Levin

  • Randomized Comparison of Surveillance Intervals after Colonoscopic Removal of Newly Diagnosed Adenomatous Polyps

    Winawer Sj;Zauber Ag;O'Brien Mj;Ho Mn

  • The National Polyp Study. Patient and polyp characteristics associated with high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas.

    Michael J. O'Brien;Sidney J. Winawer;Ann Graham Zauber;Leonard S. Gottlieb

  • Colorectal Cancer Screening

    Sidney J. Winawer;David Schottenfeld;Betty J. Flehinger

  • A Comparison of Colonoscopy and Double-Contrast Barium Enema for Surveillance after Polypectomy

    Winawer Sj;Stewart Et;Zauber Ag;Bond Jh

  • Familial colorectal cancer in Ashkenazim due to a hypermutable tract in APC

    Steven J. Laken;Gloria M. Petersen;Stephen B. Gruber;Carole Oddoux

  • Erratum: Colorectal cancer screening: Clinical guidelines and rationale (Gastroenterology (1997) 112 (594-642))

    S. J. Winawer;R. H. Fletcher;L. Miller;F. Godlee

  • A Pooled Analysis of Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia Diagnoses After Colonoscopic Polypectomy

    María Elena Martínez;John A. Baron;David A. Lieberman;Arthur Schatzkin

  • European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis : Overview and introduction to the full Supplement publication.

    L. Von Karsa;J. Patnick;J. Patnick;N. Segnan;W. Atkin

  • Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after cancer resection: a consensus update by the American Cancer Society and US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

    Douglas K. Rex;Charles J. Kahi;Bernard Levin;Robert A. Smith

  • Screening for colorectal cancer with fecal occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy.

    Sidney J. Winawer;Betty J. Flehinger;David Schottenfeld;Daniel G. Miller

  • Risk of colorectal cancer in the families of patients with adenomatous polyps. National Polyp Study Workgroup.

    S J Winawer;A G Zauber;H Gerdes;M J O'Brien

Frequent Co-Authors

Ann G. Zauber
Ann G. Zauber Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Michael J. O'Brien
Michael J. O'Brien Tulane University
John H. Bond
John H. Bond Veterans Health Administration
Bernard Levin
Bernard Levin The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Timothy R. Church
Timothy R. Church University of Minnesota
David Schottenfeld
David Schottenfeld University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
David A. Lieberman
David A. Lieberman Oregon Health & Science University
Douglas K. Rex
Douglas K. Rex Indiana University
Theodore R. Levin
Theodore R. Levin Kaiser Permanente
Robert A. Smith
Robert A. Smith University of Birmingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Medicine in the USA doesn't just mean becoming a physician. There are a variety of online degrees and alternative career pathways in healthcare that could suit your goals and lifestyle.

For those interested in healthcare leadership, cahme accredited online healthcare administration programs offer a flexible route to management roles in hospitals and clinics. These accredited programs can jumpstart a career in the business side of medicine.

Registered Nurses looking to advance their education can benefit from accelerated pathways. Curious about clinical requirements? Learn the answer to "does rn to bsn require clinicals" and find programs tailored to working professionals.

For nurses aiming to attain the highest level of clinical expertise, Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) degrees are now more accessible than ever. Discover your options with 1 year dnp program online choices and explore how online dnp programs can be a convenient way to balance advanced study with your career.

These online pathways open doors to diverse roles in healthcare, offering respected qualifications with greater flexibility for busy professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Sidney J. Winawer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles