World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
75
Citations
22876
World Ranking
19070
National Ranking
9504

David Schottenfeld publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Schottenfeld sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 194 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

David Schottenfeld D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Schottenfeld sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1987 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

David Schottenfeld is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their academic work lies primarily within the field of Medicine, with particular emphasis on the subfields of Epidemiology, Oncology, and Ophthalmology.

The topics covered by Schottenfeld's research include:

  • Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
  • Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Ocular Oncology and Treatments

Schottenfeld has contributed to several research publications in recognized venues. Key recent papers include the 2021 work entitled Epidemiology of Breast Cancer, published in the journal Breast Cancer, and a 2022 Book Review appearing in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine.

Frequent publication venues where Schottenfeld's work appears are:

  • Breast Cancer
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Throughout their career, Schottenfeld has collaborated with various researchers, although no frequent co-authors are specifically noted in the current data.

In recognition of their contributions to science, Schottenfeld was awarded the title of Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1987.

Best Publications

  • Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention

    David Schottenfeld;Joseph F. Fraumeni

  • The epidemiology of chronic venous insufficiency and varicose veins.

    Jennifer L. Beebe-Dimmer;John R. Pfeifer;Jennifer S. Engle;David Schottenfeld

  • Prevalence, incidence, survival, and disease characteristics of systemic sclerosis in a large US population

    Maureen D. Mayes;James V. Lacey;Jennifer Beebe-Dimmer;Brenda W. Gillespie

  • Colorectal Cancer Screening

    Sidney J. Winawer;David Schottenfeld;Betty J. Flehinger

  • Colposcopy for the diagnosis of squamous intraepithelial lesions : A meta-analysis

    Michele Follen Mitchell;David Schottenfeld;Guillermo Tortolero-Luna;Scott B. Cantor

  • Chronic inflammation: a common and important factor in the pathogenesis of neoplasia.

    David Schottenfeld;Jennifer Beebe-Dimmer

  • Screening for colorectal cancer with fecal occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy.

    Sidney J. Winawer;Betty J. Flehinger;David Schottenfeld;Daniel G. Miller

  • RISK FACTORS FOR BREAST CANCER

    Susan P. Helmrich;Samuel Shapiro;Lynn Rosenberg;David W. Kaufman

  • "Residual" mammary carcinoma following simulated partial mastectomy.

    P. Peter Rosen;Alfred A. Fracchia;Jerome A. Urban;David Schottenfeld

  • THE EPIDEMIOLOGY OF TESTICULAR CANCER IN YOUNG ADULTS

    David Schottenfeld;M. Ellen Warshauer;Susan Sherlock;Ann G. Zauber

  • The Epidemiology and Pathogenesis of Neoplasia in the Small Intestine

    David Schottenfeld;Jennifer L. Beebe-Dimmer;Fawn D. Vigneau

  • Colorectal cancer screening attitudes and behavior: a population-based study.

    Nancy K Janz;Patricia A Wren;David Schottenfeld;Kenneth E Guire

  • Risk of localized and widespread endometrial cancer in relation to recent and discontinued use of conjugated estrogens.

    Samuel Shapiro;Judith P. Kelly;Lynn Rosenberg;David W. Kaufman

  • Male breast cancer: a clinicopathologic study of 97 cases.

    Keith S. Heller;Paul Peter Rosen;David Schottenfeld;Roy Ashikari

  • Progress report on controlled trial of fecal occult blood testing for the detection of colorectal neoplasia.

    Sidney J. Winawer;Sidney J. Winawer;Margo Andrews;Margo Andrews;Betty Flehinger;Betty Flehinger;Paul Sherlock;Paul Sherlock

  • Risk factors for lower urinary tract symptoms in a population-based sample of African-American men.

    Michael A. Joseph;Sioban D. Harlow;John T. Wei;Aruna V. Sarma

  • Racial differences in scleroderma among women in Michigan.

    Timothy J. Laing;Brenda W. Gillespie;Mary B. Toth;Maureen D. Mayes

  • Endometrial Cancer: Socioeconomic Status and Racial/Ethnic Differences in Stage at Diagnosis, Treatment, and Survival

    Terri Madison;David Schottenfeld;Sherman A. James;Ann G. Schwartz

  • Adverse effect of pregnancy on melanoma. A reappraisal

    M. H. Shiu;D. Schottenfeld;B. Maclean;J. G. Fortner

  • Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia: a cluster of eleven cases.

    Carol Singer;Donald Armstrong;Paul Peter Rosen;David Schottenfeld

Frequent Co-Authors

Lynn Rosenberg
Lynn Rosenberg Boston University
David W. Kaufman
David W. Kaufman Boston University
Sidney J. Winawer
Sidney J. Winawer Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
James E. Montie
James E. Montie University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Samuel Shapiro
Samuel Shapiro Boston University
John T. Wei
John T. Wei University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Rodney L. Dunn
Rodney L. Dunn University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Brenda W. Gillespie
Brenda W. Gillespie University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Maureen D. Mayes
Maureen D. Mayes The University of Texas at Austin
Donald R. Miller
Donald R. Miller University of Louisville

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in healthcare but exploring alternatives to traditional medical degrees, there are flexible and accessible online options. Many prospective nurses are now searching for a nursing school without teas test, opening doors to individuals who want to launch a nursing career without the stress of entrance exams.

For those more interested in the administrative and leadership side of healthcare, healthcare administration degree programs can be completed online and often lead to roles in hospital management, policy, and healthcare operations.

Nurses with an associate degree can advance their careers through asn to np programs, providing a direct bridge to nurse practitioner positions and greater clinical responsibility.

Additionally, if you have a passion for patient well-being and preventive care, online nutrition degree programs offer an academic path to careers in nutrition counseling, dietetics, and wellness coaching.

Exploring these related degrees provides flexible entry points into the healthcare industry, catering to diverse interests and career ambitions beyond the traditional MD route.

Best Scientists Citing David Schottenfeld

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles