World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
91
Citations
55468
World Ranking
11499
National Ranking
5894

Ann G. Zauber publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ann G. Zauber sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 393 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Ann G. Zauber D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ann G. Zauber sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA)

Overview

Ann G. Zauber is affiliated with Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a notable emphasis on oncology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, surgery, pathology and forensic medicine, and epidemiology.

The scientist's main research topics include colorectal cancer screening and detection, gastric cancer management and outcomes, genetic factors in colorectal cancer, colorectal cancer surgical treatments, global cancer incidence and screening, diverticular disease and complications, and Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies.

Zauber has contributed to multiple high-impact publications. Recent notable papers include:

  • Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death, 2022, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Colorectal Cancer Screening, 2021, JAMA
  • Young-onset colorectal cancer, 2023, Nature Reviews Disease Primers
  • Comparing the Cost-Effectiveness of Innovative Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests, 2020, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
  • Guaiac-based faecal occult blood tests versus faecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer screening in average-risk individuals, 2022, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Zauber has frequently collaborated with several co-authors, including Anne I. Hahn, Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Reinier G.S. Meester, Amy B. Knudsen, and Carolyn M. Rutter.

The scientist has published extensively in various venues. The most frequent publication venues are:

  • Gastroenterology
  • JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
  • Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
  • The American Journal of Gastroenterology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Zauber received the distinction of Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA) in 2016.

Best Publications

  • Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.

    S J Winawer;A G Zauber;M N Ho;M J O'Brien

  • Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: A consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society

    Sidney J. Winawer;Ann G. Zauber;Robert H. Fletcher;Jonathon S. Stillman

  • Colonoscopic Polypectomy and Long-Term Prevention of Colorectal-Cancer Deaths

    Ann G. Zauber;Sidney J. Winawer;Michael J. O'Brien;Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar

  • Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975-2006, Featuring Colorectal Cancer Trends and Impact of Interventions (Risk Factors, Screening, and Treatment) to Reduce Future Rates

    Brenda K. Edwards;Elizabeth Ward;Betsy A. Kohler;Christie Eheman

  • Cardiovascular Risk Associated With Celecoxib in a Clinical Trial for Colorectal Adenoma Prevention

    Scott D. Solomon;John J.V. McMurray;Marc A. Pfeffer;Janet Wittes

  • Adenoma Detection Rate and Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Death

    Douglas A. Corley;Christopher D. Jensen;Amy R. Marks;Wei K. Zhao

  • Celecoxib for the Prevention of Colorectal Adenomatous Polyps

    Nadir Arber;Craig J. Eagle;Julius Spicak;István Rácz

  • Celecoxib for the Prevention of Sporadic Colorectal Adenomas

    Monica M. Bertagnolli;Craig J. Eagle;Ann G. Zauber;Mark Redston

  • Randomized Comparison of Surveillance Intervals after Colonoscopic Removal of Newly Diagnosed Adenomatous Polyps

    Winawer Sj;Zauber Ag;O'Brien Mj;Ho Mn

  • The National Polyp Study. Patient and polyp characteristics associated with high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas.

    Michael J. O'Brien;Sidney J. Winawer;Ann Graham Zauber;Leonard S. Gottlieb

  • A Comparison of Colonoscopy and Double-Contrast Barium Enema for Surveillance after Polypectomy

    Winawer Sj;Stewart Et;Zauber Ag;Bond Jh

  • Evaluating Test Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Decision Analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force

    Ann G. Zauber;Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar;Amy B. Knudsen;Janneke Wilschut

  • A Pooled Analysis of Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia Diagnoses After Colonoscopic Polypectomy

    María Elena Martínez;John A. Baron;David A. Lieberman;Arthur Schatzkin

  • A Hypothesis: Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Reduce the Incidence of Large-Bowel Cancer

    Lynn Rosenberg;Julie R. Palmer;Ann G. Zauber;M. Ellen Warshauer

  • Nonpolypoid neoplastic lesions of the colorectal mucosa.

    Shin ei Kudo;René Lambert;John I. Allen;Hiroaki Fujii

  • Estimation of Benefits, Burden, and Harms of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies: Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force

    Amy B. Knudsen;Ann G. Zauber;Carolyn M. Rutter;Steffie K. Naber

  • Preoperative staging of esophageal cancer: comparison of endoscopic US and dynamic CT.

    J F Botet;C J Lightdale;A G Zauber;H Gerdes

  • Risk of colorectal cancer in the families of patients with adenomatous polyps. National Polyp Study Workgroup.

    S J Winawer;A G Zauber;H Gerdes;M J O'Brien

  • Colorectal cancers soon after colonoscopy: a pooled multicohort analysis

    Douglas J Robertson;David A Lieberman;Sidney J Winawer;Dennis J Ahnen

  • The advanced adenoma as the primary target of screening.

    Sidney J Winawer;Ann G Zauber

Frequent Co-Authors

Sidney J. Winawer
Sidney J. Winawer Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Douglas A. Corley
Douglas A. Corley Kaiser Permanente
Chyke A. Doubeni
Chyke A. Doubeni The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
Theodore R. Levin
Theodore R. Levin Kaiser Permanente
Karen M. Kuntz
Karen M. Kuntz University of Minnesota
Monica M. Bertagnolli
Monica M. Bertagnolli Brigham and Women's Hospital
Michael J. O'Brien
Michael J. O'Brien Tulane University
Lynn Rosenberg
Lynn Rosenberg Boston University
Samuel Shapiro
Samuel Shapiro Boston University
Julie R. Palmer
Julie R. Palmer Boston University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine doesn't always mean attending medical school. Numerous online degrees offer flexible options for those interested in healthcare. For example, Registered Nurses seeking faster specialization can pursue the fastest psych np program to become psychiatric mental health nurse practitioners.

Those interested in the business side of healthcare can earn an online health management degree, a great path for future health administrators. If you're looking at graduate-level options, there are also cheapest mha programs online healthcare for those seeking a Master’s in Healthcare Administration without breaking the bank.

Advanced practice nurses can further their careers with msn to dnp programs online, providing a pathway to leadership and clinical expertise. These online degrees increase accessibility to rewarding healthcare careers and allow working professionals to advance while maintaining their commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Ann G. Zauber

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles