World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 91 11692 10998 5996 5549 373 32854

Karen M. Kuntz publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Karen M. Kuntz between 1992 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Karen M. Kuntz published across 35 years, from 1992 to 2026, averaging 12.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 45 publications in 2013. 17 of the 425 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 45. Peak 45 publications in 2013. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 8 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 20 publications 2000: 15 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 19 publications 2003: 15 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 15 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 27 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 45 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 14 publications 2026: 3 publications
1992 2026

425 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Karen M. Kuntz: publications per year, 1992 to 2026
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 0
1994 1
1995 8
1996 9
1997 9
1998 7
1999 20
2000 15
2001 13
2002 19
2003 15
2004 8
2005 15
2006 15
2007 14
2008 7
2009 27
2010 11
2011 11
2012 16
2013 45
2014 8
2015 12
2016 15
2017 12
2018 13
2019 8
2020 13
2021 20
2022 3
2023 11
2024 7
2025 14
2026 3
Total 425
Download as CSV

Karen M. Kuntz publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karen M. Kuntz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 361–380 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 373 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838 373
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Karen M. Kuntz D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karen M. Kuntz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 90–91 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922 91
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Karen M. Kuntz is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with significant contributions in oncology and related subfields such as pathology and forensic medicine, surgery, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, and economics and econometrics. The core area of their work centers on colorectal cancer, covering diverse aspects from screening to treatment.

The main topics of Karen M. Kuntz's research encompass:

  • Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
  • Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
  • Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments

Their recent published papers include:

  • "Colorectal Cancer Screening," 2021, JAMA
  • "Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening With a Blood Test That Meets the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Coverage Decision," 2024, Gastroenterology
  • "Estimating Population-Based Recurrence Rates of Colorectal Cancer over Time in the United States," 2020, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
  • "Characteristics of a cost-effective blood test for colorectal cancer screening," 2024, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
  • "Informing Medication Discontinuation Decisions among Older Adults with Relapsing-Onset Multiple Sclerosis," 2020, Drugs & Aging

Karen M. Kuntz frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Fernando Alarid-Escudero
  • Amy B. Knudsen
  • Carolyn M. Rutter
  • Ann G. Zauber
  • Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar

Their work is regularly published in various scientific venues, with the most common being:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Value in Health
  • Medical Decision Making
  • JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
  • Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention

Best Publications

  • Recommendations for Conduct, Methodological Practices, and Reporting of Cost-effectiveness Analyses: Second Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine

    Gillian D. Sanders;Peter J. Neumann;Anirban Basu;Dan W. Brock

  • Modeling good research practices--overview: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-1.

    J. Jaime Caro;Andrew H. Briggs;Uwe Siebert;Karen M. Kuntz

  • State-transition modeling: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force--3.

    Uwe Siebert;Uwe Siebert;Oguzhan Alagoz;Ahmed M. Bayoumi;Beate Jahn

  • Meta-analysis: Diagnostic Accuracy of Anti–Cyclic Citrullinated Peptide Antibody and Rheumatoid Factor for Rheumatoid Arthritis

    Kunihiro Nishimura;Daisuke Sugiyama;Yoshinori Kogata;Goh Tsuji

  • Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population.

    A. Lindsay Frazier;Graham A. Colditz;Charles S. Fuchs;Karen M. Kuntz

  • Exercise echocardiography or exercise SPECT imaging? A meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance.

    Kirsten E. Fleischmann;M. G. Myriam Hunink;Karen M. Kuntz;Pamela S. Douglas

  • Evaluating Test Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Decision Analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force

    Ann G. Zauber;Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar;Amy B. Knudsen;Janneke Wilschut

  • Mutations in progranulin are a major cause of ubiquitin-positive frontotemporal lobar degeneration

    Jennifer Gass;Ashley Cannon;Ian R. Mackenzie;Bradley Boeve

  • Decision analysis - Effects of prophylactic mastectomy and oophorectomy on life expectancy among women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations

    Deborah Schrag;Karen M. Kuntz;Judy E. Garber;Jane C. Weeks

  • Novel mutations in TARDBP (TDP-43) in patients with familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

    Nicola J. Rutherford;Yong-Jie Zhang;Matt Baker;Jennifer M Gass

  • The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening for anal squamous intraepithelial lesions in homosexual and bisexual HIV-positive men.

    Sue J. Goldie;Karen M. Kuntz;Milton C. Weinstein;Kenneth A. Freedberg

  • Estimation of Benefits, Burden, and Harms of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies: Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force

    Amy B. Knudsen;Ann G. Zauber;Carolyn M. Rutter;Steffie K. Naber

  • Effect of Verification Bias on Screening for Prostate Cancer by Measurement of Prostate-Specific Antigen

    Rinaa S. Punglia;Anthony V. D'Amico;William J. Catalona;William J. Catalona;Kimberly A. Roehl

  • Characterization of frontotemporal dementia and/or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis associated with the GGGGCC repeat expansion in C9ORF72

    Bradley F. Boeve;Kevin B. Boylan;Neill R. Graff-Radford;Mariely DeJesus-Hernandez

  • Plasma progranulin levels predict progranulin mutation status in frontotemporal dementia patients and asymptomatic family members.

    NiCole Finch;Matt Baker;Richard Crook;Katie Swanson

  • Post-lumbar puncture headaches: experience in 501 consecutive procedures.

    K. M. Kuntz;Emre Kokmen;J. C. Stevens;P. Miller

  • FEV1 is associated with risk of asthma attacks in a pediatric population

    Anne L. Fuhlbrigge;Barrett T. Kitch;A.David Paltiel;Karen M. Kuntz

  • Cost effectiveness of aspirin, clopidogrel, or both for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease.

    Jean Michel Gaspoz;Pamela G. Coxson;Paula A. Goldman;Lawrence W. Williams

  • HER-2 Testing and Trastuzumab Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

    Elena B. Elkin;Milton C. Weinstein;Eric P. Winer;Karen M. Kuntz

  • Dynamic Transmission Modeling: A Report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-5

    Richard Pitman;David Fisman;Gregory S. Zaric;Maarten Postma

Frequent Co-Authors

Ann G. Zauber
Ann G. Zauber Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Milton C. Weinstein
Milton C. Weinstein Harvard University
Bradley F. Boeve
Bradley F. Boeve Mayo Clinic
Jane C. Weeks
Jane C. Weeks Harvard University
Sue J. Goldie
Sue J. Goldie Harvard University
Carolyn M. Rutter
Carolyn M. Rutter RAND Corporation
Peter J. Neumann
Peter J. Neumann University of Bern
M. G. Myriam Hunink
M. G. Myriam Hunink Erasmus University Rotterdam
Anne L. Fuhlbrigge
Anne L. Fuhlbrigge University of Colorado Denver
Rosa Rademakers
Rosa Rademakers University of Antwerp

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a medical career in the USA doesn't always require a traditional path. Many students explore flexible online degrees as an alternative or supplementary option. For licensed nurses, affordable rn to bsn programs are a popular choice, offering a cost-effective way to advance your nursing credentials while balancing work and study.

If you’re considering an advanced nursing role but don’t already have a nursing background, direct msn programs online allow non-nurses to rapidly earn a master’s degree and enter the field. Similarly, direct entry nursing programs can provide an accelerated route for those looking to change careers into nursing without prior experience.

Not all healthcare professions require years of medical school. Careers in healthcare administration, such as medical billing and coding, are increasingly in demand. Those interested can pursue training at medical billing and coding online schools that offer financial aid and nationally accredited programs.

Best Scientists Citing Karen M. Kuntz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles