World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
103
Citations
41118
World Ranking
7335
National Ranking
278

M. G. Myriam Hunink publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. G. Myriam Hunink sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 413 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

M. G. Myriam Hunink D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. G. Myriam Hunink sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 103 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

M. G. Myriam Hunink is affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a focus on several subfields including Economics and Econometrics, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, General Health Professions, Surgery, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

Their work encompasses diverse topics such as Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life; Healthcare cost, quality, practices; Acute Ischemic Stroke Management; Advanced Causal Inference Techniques; Peripheral Artery Disease Management; Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments; and Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with M. G. Myriam Hunink include:

  • Stijntje Dijk
  • Eline Krijkamp
  • Bart S. Ferket
  • Kirsten E. Fleischmann
  • Umesh Masharani

Publication venues frequently featuring their work are:

  • Medical Decision Making
  • Neurology
  • Diabetes Care
  • Value in Health
  • European Journal of Epidemiology

Some of the notable recent papers involving M. G. Myriam Hunink include:

  • "Do Case-Control Studies Always Estimate Odds Ratios?" (2020), published in American Journal of Epidemiology
  • "Public health and cost consequences of time delays to thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke" (2020), published in Neurology
  • "Public Health and Cost Benefits of Successful Reperfusion After Thrombectomy for Stroke" (2020), published in Stroke
  • "Cardiovascular and Renal Benefits of Novel Diabetes Drugs by Baseline Cardiovascular Risk: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Meta-regression" (2023), published in Diabetes Care
  • "Cost-effectiveness of Contemporary Statin Use Guidelines With or Without Coronary Artery Calcium Assessment in African American Individuals" (2020), published in JAMA Cardiology

Best Publications

  • Ankle brachial index combined with Framingham risk score to predict cardiovascular events and mortality: A meta-analysis

    F.G.R. Fowkes;G.D. Murray;I. Butcher;C.L. Heald

  • Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study.

    W. Bob Meijboom;Matthijs F.L. Meijs;Joanne D. Schuijf;Maarten J. Cramer

  • Decision Making in Health and Medicine: Integrating Evidence and Values

    M. G Myriam Hunink;Milton C. Weinstein;Eve Wittenberg;Michael F. Drummond

  • The Recent Decline in Mortality From Coronary Heart Disease, 1980-1990: The Effect of Secular Trends in Risk Factors and Treatment

    Maria G. M. Hunink;Lee Goldman;Lee Goldman;Anna N. A. Tosteson;Anna N. A. Tosteson;Murray A. Mittleman

  • Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Ivo G. Schoots;Monique J. Roobol;Daan Nieboer;Chris H. Bangma

  • Exercise echocardiography or exercise SPECT imaging? A meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance.

    Kirsten E. Fleischmann;M. G. Myriam Hunink;Karen M. Kuntz;Pamela S. Douglas

  • Standardised mindfulness-based interventions in healthcare: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of RCTs

    Rinske A. Gotink;Paula Chu;Jan J. V. Busschbach;Herbert Benson

  • Meta-analysis of the results of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stent placement for aortoiliac occlusive disease.

    Johanna Bosch;Maria Hunink

  • Staging investigations for oesophageal cancer: a meta-analysis

    E P M van Vliet;M H Heijenbrok-Kal;M G M Hunink;E J Kuipers

  • A clinical prediction rule for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: validation, updating, and extension.

    Tessa S S Genders;Ewout W Steyerberg;Hatem Alkadhi;Sebastian Leschka

  • Duplex Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Angiography Compared With Digital Subtraction Angiography in Carotid Artery Stenosis A Systematic Review

    Paul J. Nederkoorn;Yolanda van der Graaf;M.G. Myriam Hunink

  • Results of aortic bifurcation grafts for aortoiliac occlusive disease: A meta-analysis

    Sybolt O. de Vries;Maria G.M. Hunink

  • Natural Language Processing in Radiology: A Systematic Review.

    Ewoud Pons;Loes M M Braun;M G Myriam Hunink;Jan A Kors

  • Diagnostic performance of multidetector CT angiography for assessment of coronary artery disease: meta-analysis.

    Piet K Vanhoenacker;Majanka H Heijenbrok-Kal;Ruben Van Heste;Isabel Decramer

  • Randomised comparison of primary stent placement versus primary angioplasty followed by selective stent placement in patients with iliac-artery occlusive disease

    Eric Tetteroo;Yolanda van der Graaf;Johanna L Bosch;Andries D van Engelen

  • External validation of the Canadian CT Head Rule and the New Orleans Criteria for CT scanning in patients with minor head injury.

    Marion Smits;Diederik W. J. Dippel;Gijs G. de Haan;Heleen M. Dekker

  • MR imaging of the menisci and cruciate ligaments: A systematic review

    Edwin H G Oei;Jeroen J Nikken;Antonia C M Verstijnen;Abida Z Ginai

  • Accuracy of Computed Tomographic Angiography and Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Diagnosing Renal Artery Stenosis

    G. Boudewijn C. Vasbinder;Patricia J. Nelemans;Alfons G.H. Kessels;Abraham A. Kroon

  • Coronary calcium score improves classification of coronary heart disease risk in the elderly: the Rotterdam study

    Suzette E. Elias-Smale;Rozemarijn Vliegenthart Proença;Michael T. Koller;Maryam Kavousi

  • Determinants of peripheral arterial disease in the elderly: The Rotterdam Study

    Wouter T. Meijer;Diederick E. Grobbee;M. G. Myriam Hunink;Albert Hofman

Frequent Co-Authors

Gabriel P. Krestin
Gabriel P. Krestin Erasmus University Rotterdam
Milton C. Weinstein
Milton C. Weinstein Harvard University
Ewout W. Steyerberg
Ewout W. Steyerberg Leiden University Medical Center
Albert Hofman
Albert Hofman Harvard University
Diederik W.J. Dippel
Diederik W.J. Dippel Erasmus University Rotterdam
John B. Wong
John B. Wong Tufts University
Theo Stijnen
Theo Stijnen Leiden University Medical Center
Paul Glasziou
Paul Glasziou Bond University
Jacqueline C.M. Witteman
Jacqueline C.M. Witteman Erasmus University Rotterdam
Koen Nieman
Koen Nieman Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Medicine in the USA often leads students to consider alternative or accelerated pathways in the healthcare field. Online degrees can provide faster, flexible options for advancing your medical career. For those looking to quickly earn their doctorate in nursing with minimal on-campus requirements, consider the fastest dnp online program options, which are tailored for busy professionals.

If you’re searching for a more approachable or less intensive doctoral program, community recommendations can be helpful — see insights on the easiest dnp program reddit discussion.

For those wishing to begin their healthcare journey as quickly as possible, a fast lpn program could be an ideal entry point, offering a streamlined pathway to licensure as a Licensed Practical Nurse. Additionally, those interested in mental health may consider the fastest pmhnp program to become a Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner in less time.

Exploring these online degrees expands your career possibilities, allowing you to advance or pivot within the medical field without traditional time constraints.

Best Scientists Citing M. G. Myriam Hunink

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles