What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Internal medicine
- Law
- Statistics
His main research concerns MEDLINE, Internal medicine, Evidence-based medicine, Medical physics and Research design.
His MEDLINE research incorporates themes from Meta-analysis, Checklist, Guideline and Randomized controlled trial.
His Internal medicine study combines topics in areas such as Diabetes mellitus, Intensive care medicine, Surgery and Cardiology.
His research integrates issues of Grading, Evidence-based practice and Health care in his study of Evidence-based medicine.
As a part of the same scientific study, Paul Glasziou usually deals with the Medical physics, concentrating on Quality assurance and frequently concerns with Actuarial science.
His research in Glycated hemoglobin intersects with topics in Hypoglycemia, Proportional hazards model, Diabetic angiopathy and Hazard ratio.
His most cited work include:
- Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. (5527 citations)
- Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. (5527 citations)
- Prevention of cardiovascular events and death with pravastatin in patients with coronary heart disease and a broad range of initial cholesterol levels (4595 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Internal medicine, MEDLINE, Alternative medicine, Family medicine and Evidence-based medicine are his primary areas of study.
His Internal medicine research includes themes of Diabetes mellitus, Placebo, Surgery and Cardiology.
Paul Glasziou works in the field of Diabetes mellitus, focusing on Type 2 diabetes in particular.
Paul Glasziou combines subjects such as Psychological intervention, Medical physics and Intensive care medicine with his study of MEDLINE.
His work in Alternative medicine tackles topics such as Medical education which are related to areas like Evidence-based practice.
His studies deal with areas such as Health care and Disease as well as Family medicine.
He most often published in these fields:
- Internal medicine (16.72%)
- MEDLINE (15.95%)
- Alternative medicine (12.07%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2016-2021)?
- Systematic review (9.19%)
- Meta-analysis (7.64%)
- Family medicine (12.51%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary scientific interests are in Systematic review, Meta-analysis, Family medicine, MEDLINE and Psychological intervention.
As part of one scientific family, Paul Glasziou deals mainly with the area of Systematic review, narrowing it down to issues related to the Guideline, and often Health technology, Quality and Certainty.
His Meta-analysis study results in a more complete grasp of Internal medicine.
His studies in Internal medicine integrate themes in fields like Antibiotic use, Antibiotics, Oncology and Cardiology.
Paul Glasziou has included themes like Alternative medicine and Jury in his Family medicine study.
His study on MEDLINE also encompasses disciplines like
- Health care together with Evidence-based medicine,
- Disease, which have a strong connection to Epidemiology.
Between 2016 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Interpreting results and drawing conclusions (403 citations)
- Evidence for overuse of medical services around the world (312 citations)
- Estimating the extent of asymptomatic COVID-19 and its potential for community transmission: Systematic review and meta-analysis (139 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Internal medicine
- Law
- Disease
His primary areas of investigation include Systematic review, Meta-analysis, MEDLINE, Guideline and Evidence-based medicine.
The various areas that he examines in his Systematic review study include Quality, Data extraction, Randomized controlled trial, Resource and Data science.
Meta-analysis is the subject of his research, which falls under Internal medicine.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Diabetes mellitus, Oncology and Cardiology.
His work in the fields of Cardiology, such as Coronary heart disease, overlaps with other areas such as In patient.
His work on Patient participation as part of his general MEDLINE study is frequently connected to Perspective, thereby bridging the divide between different branches of science.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
