World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
54
Citations
10207
World Ranking
4062
National Ranking
1547

Christian Hogrefe publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christian Hogrefe sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 227 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Christian Hogrefe D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christian Hogrefe sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Christian Hogrefe is affiliated with the Environmental Protection Agency in the United States. Their research predominantly spans the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a significant focus on Atmospheric Science as a subfield.

The main topics of their scholarly work include:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Vehicle emissions and performance
  • Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting

Hogrefe's frequent co-authors consist of researchers with whom they have collaborated extensively. These include Rohit Mathur, Barron H. Henderson, Jesse O. Bash, Golam Sarwar, and Kristen M. Foley, with co-authorship counts ranging from 15 to 30 publications.

Their work has been published in various scientific journals, with the most frequent publication venues being:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Geoscientific model development
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • Atmospheric Environment

Recent publications illustrate the scope and depth of their research contributions. Selected papers include:

  • "The Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model versions 5.3 and 5.3.1: system updates and evaluation," 2021, published in Geoscientific model development
  • "2002-2017 anthropogenic emissions data for air quality modeling over the United States," 2023, published in Data in Brief
  • "Long-term regional trends of nitrogen and sulfur deposition in the United States from 2002 to 2017," 2022, published in Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • "Technical note: AQMEII4 Activity 1: evaluation of wet and dry deposition schemes as an integral part of regional-scale air quality models," 2021, published in Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • "Modeling stratospheric intrusion and trans-Pacific transport on tropospheric ozone using hemispheric CMAQ during April 2010 - Part 1: Model evaluation and air mass characterization for stratosphere-troposphere transport," 2020, published in Atmospheric chemistry and physics

Best Publications

  • Climate change, ambient ozone, and health in 50 US cities

    Michelle L. Bell;Richard Goldberg;Christian Hogrefe;Patrick L. Kinney

  • Assessing ozone-related health impacts under a changing climate.

    Kim Knowlton;Joyce E. Rosenthal;Christian Hogrefe;Barry Lynn

  • The Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model versions 5.3 and 5.3.1: system updates and evaluation.

    K. Wyat Appel;Jesse O. Bash;Kathleen M. Fahey;Kristen M. Foley

  • Simulating changes in regional air pollution over the eastern United States due to changes in global and regional climate and emissions

    C. Hogrefe;B. Lynn;K. Civerolo;J.-Y. Ku

  • Projecting Heat-Related Mortality Impacts Under a Changing Climate in the New York City Region

    Kim Knowlton;Barry Lynn;Richard A. Goldberg;Cynthia Rosenzweig

  • Description and evaluation of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system version 5.1.

    K. Wyat Appel;Sergey L. Napelenok;Kristen M. Foley;Havala O. T. Pye

  • A Preliminary Synthesis of Modeled Climate Change Impacts on U.S. Regional Ozone Concentrations

    C. P. Weaver;X. Z. Liang;J. Zhu;P. J. Adams

  • A framework for evaluating regional-scale numerical photochemical modeling systems

    Robin Dennis;Tyler Fox;Montse Fuentes;Alice Gilliland

  • Evaluation of operational on-line-coupled regional air quality models over Europe and North America in the context of AQMEII phase 2. Part I: Ozone

    Ulas Im;Roberto Bianconi;Efisio Solazzo;Ioannis Kioutsioukis

  • Impacts of aerosol direct effects on tropospheric ozone through changes in atmospheric dynamics and photolysis rates

    Jia Xing;Jiandong Wang;Rohit Mathur;Shuxiao Wang

  • Historical gaseous and primary aerosol emissions in the United States from 1990 to 2010

    J. Xing;J. Pleim;R. Mathur;G. Pouliot

  • Observations and modeling of air quality trends over 1990–2010 across the Northern Hemisphere: China, the United States and Europe

    J. Xing;R. Mathur;J. Pleim;C. Hogrefe

  • Evaluation of operational online-coupled regional air quality models over Europe and North America in the context of AQMEII phase 2. Part II: Particulate matter

    Ulas Im;Roberto Bianconi;Efisio Solazzo;Ioannis Kioutsioukis

  • Estimating the Effects of Increased Urbanization on Surface Meteorology and Ozone Concentrations in the New York City Metropolitan Region

    Kevin Civerolo;Christian Hogrefe;Barry Lynn;Barry Lynn;Joyce Rosenthal

  • Model evaluation and ensemble modelling of surface-level ozone in Europe and North America in the context of AQMEII

    Efisio Solazzo;Roberto Bianconi;Robert Vautard;K. Wyat Appel

  • Evaluating the performance of regional-scale photochemical modeling systems. Part III—Precursor predictions

    Christian Hogrefe;S.Trivikrama Rao;Prasad Kasibhatla;Winston Hao

  • Feedbacks between air pollution and weather, Part 1: Effects on weather

    P.A. Makar;W. Gong;J. Milbrandt;C. Hogrefe

  • Influence of the choice of gas-phase mechanism on predictions of key gaseous pollutants during the AQMEII phase-2 intercomparison

    Christoph Knote;Paolo Tuccella;Gabriele Curci;Louisa Emmons

  • Linking global to regional models to assess future climate impacts on surface ozone levels in the United States

    Christopher G. Nolte;Christopher G. Nolte;Alice B. Gilliland;Alice B. Gilliland;Christian Hogrefe;Loretta J. Mickley

  • Feedbacks between air pollution and weather, part 2: Effects on chemistry

    P.A. Makar;W. Gong;C. Hogrefe;Y. Zhang

  • Interpreting the Information in Ozone Observations and Model Predictions Relevant to Regulatory Policies in the Eastern United States

    Christian Hogrefe;S. Trivikrama Rao;Igor G. Zurbenko;P. Steven Porter

  • Dynamic evaluation of regional air quality models: Assessing changes in O3 stemming from changes in emissions and meteorology

    Alice B. Gilliland;Christian Hogrefe;Robert W. Pinder;James M. Godowitch

Frequent Co-Authors

Rohit Mathur
Rohit Mathur Environmental Protection Agency
Patrick L. Kinney
Patrick L. Kinney Boston University
Cynthia Rosenzweig
Cynthia Rosenzweig Goddard Institute for Space Studies
Jonathan E. Pleim
Jonathan E. Pleim Environmental Protection Agency
Kevin Civerolo
Kevin Civerolo New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Jia Xing
Jia Xing Tsinghua University
Ulas Im
Ulas Im Aarhus University
Efisio Solazzo
Efisio Solazzo European Food Safety Authority
S. Trivikrama Rao
S. Trivikrama Rao North Carolina State University
George Pouliot
George Pouliot Environmental Protection Agency

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities and skill sets. Many learners begin with an affordable online general studies degree, which offers flexibility and a foundation in multiple disciplines while keeping costs manageable.

Some may prefer to pursue an easiest bachelors degree option that still aligns with environmental interests. These programs are designed to reduce workload intensity without compromising quality, helping students balance education with other commitments.

Specialized fields like geology and geoscience are closely linked to Environmental Sciences. Earning a degree through one of the top online geology programs can lead to careers in resource management, environmental consulting, or earth science research.

Additionally, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) skills are increasingly valuable for analyzing environmental data. Pursuing a geographic information systems degree provides technical expertise in mapping and spatial analysis, enhancing job prospects in conservation and urban planning.

Best Scientists Citing Christian Hogrefe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles