World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
46
Citations
8875
World Ranking
6029
National Ranking
2181

George Pouliot publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George Pouliot sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 108 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

George Pouliot D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George Pouliot sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

George Pouliot is affiliated with the Environmental Protection Agency in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on environmental science with significant contributions to earth and planetary sciences. Their expertise spans multiple subfields including atmospheric science, global and planetary change, health, toxicology and mutagenesis, environmental engineering, and automotive engineering.

They have published extensively on topics related to atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, air quality and health impacts, atmospheric ozone and climate, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, air quality monitoring and forecasting, fire effects on ecosystems, and atmospheric aerosols and clouds. These research interests reflect a broad engagement with the interactions between atmospheric phenomena and environmental health.

George Pouliot's recent publications illustrate their active role in advancing scientific understanding in air quality modeling and emissions data. Notable papers include:

  • The Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model versions 5.3 and 5.3.1: system updates and evaluation, 2021, Geoscientific model development
  • The HTAP_v3 emission mosaic: merging regional and global monthly emissions (2000-2018) to support air quality modelling and policies, 2023, Earth system science data
  • 2002-2017 anthropogenic emissions data for air quality modeling over the United States, 2023, Data in Brief
  • Long-term regional trends of nitrogen and sulfur deposition in the United States from 2002 to 2017, 2022, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • The Detailed Emissions Scaling, Isolation, and Diagnostic (DESID) module in the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system version 5.3.2, 2021, Geoscientific model development

Their frequent co-authors include researchers such as Robert C. Gilliam, Christian Hogrefe, Kristen M. Foley, Rohit Mathur, and Havala O. T. Pye, indicating active collaboration in their field.

George Pouliot's work has been published in a range of journals, with multiple papers appearing in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Geoscientific Model Development, Earth System Science Data, Data in Brief, and The Science of The Total Environment.

Best Publications

  • HTAP_v2.2: a mosaic of regional and global emission grid maps for 2008 and 2010 to study hemispheric transport of air pollution

    G. Janssens-Maenhout;M. Crippa;D. Guizzardi;F. Dentener

  • Model Representation of Secondary Organic Aerosol in CMAQv4.7

    Annmarie G Carlton;Prakash V Bhave;Sergey L Napelenok;Edward O Edney

  • The Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model versions 5.3 and 5.3.1: system updates and evaluation.

    K. Wyat Appel;Jesse O. Bash;Kathleen M. Fahey;Kristen M. Foley

  • To What Extent Can Biogenic SOA be Controlled

    Annmarie G. Carlton;Robert W. Pinder;Prakash V. Bhave;George A. Pouliot

  • The health impacts and economic value of wildland fire episodes in the U.S.: 2008-2012.

    Neal Fann;Breanna Alman;Richard A. Broome;Geoffrey G. Morgan

  • Emissions inventory of PM2.5 trace elements across the United States.

    Adam Reff;Prakash V Bhave;Heather Simon;Thompson G Pace

  • Description and evaluation of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system version 5.1.

    K. Wyat Appel;Sergey L. Napelenok;Kristen M. Foley;Havala O. T. Pye

  • Unspeciated organic emissions from combustion sources and their influence on the secondary organic aerosol budget in the United States

    Shantanu H. Jathar;Timothy D. Gordon;Christopher J. Hennigan;Havala O. T. Pye

  • WRF-CMAQ two-way coupled system with aerosol feedback: software development and preliminary results

    D. C. Wong;J. Pleim;R. Mathur;F. Binkowski

  • Evaluation of dust and trace metal estimates from the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model version 5.0

    K. W. Appel;G. A. Pouliot;H. Simon;G. Sarwar

  • Evaluation of operational on-line-coupled regional air quality models over Europe and North America in the context of AQMEII phase 2. Part I: Ozone

    Ulas Im;Roberto Bianconi;Efisio Solazzo;Ioannis Kioutsioukis

  • The development and uses of EPA’s SPECIATE database

    Heather Simon;Lee Beck;Prakash V. Bhave;Frank Divita

  • Historical gaseous and primary aerosol emissions in the United States from 1990 to 2010

    J. Xing;J. Pleim;R. Mathur;G. Pouliot

  • Observations and modeling of air quality trends over 1990–2010 across the Northern Hemisphere: China, the United States and Europe

    J. Xing;R. Mathur;J. Pleim;C. Hogrefe

  • Evaluation of operational online-coupled regional air quality models over Europe and North America in the context of AQMEII phase 2. Part II: Particulate matter

    Ulas Im;Roberto Bianconi;Efisio Solazzo;Ioannis Kioutsioukis

  • Community Vulnerability to Health Impacts of Wildland Fire Smoke Exposure

    Ana G. Rappold;Jeanette Reyes;George Pouliot;Wayne E. Cascio

  • Linking the Eta Model with the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System to Build a National Air Quality Forecasting System

    Tanya L. Otte;George Pouliot;Jonathan E. Pleim;Jeffrey O. Young

  • Regional sources of atmospheric formaldehyde and acetaldehyde, and implications for atmospheric modeling

    D.J. Luecken;W.T. Hutzell;M.L. Strum;G.A. Pouliot

  • Comparing emission inventories and model-ready emission datasets between Europe and North America for the AQMEII project

    George Pouliot;Thomas Pierce;Hugo Denier van der Gon;Martijn Schaap

  • The HTAP_v3 emission mosaic: merging regional and global monthly emissions (2000–2018) to support air quality modelling and policies

    Unknown

  • Contribution of regional-scale fire events to ozone and PM2.5 air quality estimated by photochemical modeling approaches

    K.R. Baker;M.C. Woody;G.S. Tonnesen;W. Hutzell

Frequent Co-Authors

Rohit Mathur
Rohit Mathur Environmental Protection Agency
Christian Hogrefe
Christian Hogrefe Environmental Protection Agency
Jonathan E. Pleim
Jonathan E. Pleim Environmental Protection Agency
Robert C. Gilliam
Robert C. Gilliam Environmental Protection Agency
Daiwen Kang
Daiwen Kang Environmental Protection Agency
Prakash V. Bhave
Prakash V. Bhave Duke University
Havala O. T. Pye
Havala O. T. Pye Environmental Protection Agency
Shaocai Yu
Shaocai Yu Zhejiang University
Paul A. Makar
Paul A. Makar Environment and Climate Change Canada
Jesse O. Bash
Jesse O. Bash Environmental Protection Agency

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens doors to diverse career pathways. For those beginning their academic journey, exploring the easy bachelor degrees can be a helpful starting point. These programs allow students to build foundational knowledge while balancing coursework with other commitments.

Specialized fields like geology offer focused study of Earth processes. Many students now choose reputable geology degrees online, which provide flexibility without compromising quality. These degrees prepare graduates for roles in environmental consulting, resource management, and hazard assessment.

Another growing area within environmental sciences is Geographic Information Systems (GIS). Earning a gis degree equips students with skills in spatial data analysis critical for urban planning, conservation, and disaster response.

For professionals aiming to influence public environmental policies, pursuing one of the best online masters in public administration provides advanced leadership training. This degree blends management principles with public sector knowledge, crucial for sustainable development initiatives.

Best Scientists Citing George Pouliot

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles