World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
87
Citations
28290
World Ranking
1087
National Ranking
674

Computer Science

D-Index
82
Citations
25587
World Ranking
967
National Ranking
524

Roberta L. Klatzky publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roberta L. Klatzky sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 327 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Roberta L. Klatzky D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roberta L. Klatzky sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to human visual, auditory, and haptic perception in robotics and virtual environments
  • 2017 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 2010 - Kurt Koffka Medal, Giessen University
  • 1996 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1980 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Roberta L. Klatzky is affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University in the United States. Their primary field of study is neuroscience, with a specific focus in the subfield of neurology. The main topics of research include vestibular and auditory disorders.

Collaborative work features frequent co-authors including Jeremy M. Wolfe, Dennis M. Levi, Lori L. Holt, Linda M. Bartoshuk, and Rachel S. Herz.

  • Jeremy M. Wolfe
  • Dennis M. Levi
  • Lori L. Holt
  • Linda M. Bartoshuk
  • Rachel S. Herz

Klatzky has contributed to book publications, notably with Oxford University Press. One of their published titles is Sensation & Perception, released in 2024.

The scientist has been recognized with several honors and awards, including:

  • IEEE Fellow (2018) for contributions to human visual, auditory, and haptic perception in robotics and virtual environments
  • Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (2017)
  • Kurt Koffka Medal, Giessen University (2010)
  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1996)
  • Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) (1980)

Best Publications

  • Hand movements: a window into haptic object recognition.

    Susan J Lederman;Roberta L Klatzky

  • Human Memory: Structures And Processes

    Roberta L. Klatzky

  • Haptic perception: a tutorial.

    Susan J. Lederman;Roberta L. Klatzky

  • Allocentric and Egocentric Spatial Representations: Definitions, Distinctions, and Interconnections

    Roberta L. Klatzky

  • Nonvisual navigation by blind and sighted: assessment of path integration ability

    Jack M. Loomis;Roberta L. Klatzky;Reginald G. Golledge;Joseph G. Cicinelli

  • Identifying objects by touch: an "expert system".

    Roberta L. Klatzky;Susan J. Lederman;Victoria A. Metzger

  • Spatial Updating of Self-Position and Orientation During Real, Imagined, and Virtual Locomotion

    Roberta L. Klatzky;Jack M. Loomis;Andrew C. Beall;Sarah S. Chance

  • There's more to touch than meets the eye: The salience of object attributes for haptics with and without vision.

    Roberta L. Klatzky;Susan J. Lederman;Catherine Reed

  • Navigation System for the Blind: Auditory Display Modes and Guidance

    Jack M. Loomis;Reginald G. Golledge;Roberta L. Klatzky

  • Teachers’ gestures facilitate students’ learning: A lesson in symmetry

    Laura Valenzeno;Martha W Alibali;Roberta Klatzky

  • Extracting object properties through haptic exploration.

    Susan J. Lederman;Roberta L. Klatzky

  • Can you squeeze a tomato? The role of motor representations in semantic sensibility judgments

    Roberta L Klatzky;James W Pellegrino;Brian P McCloskey;Sally Doherty

  • Haptic classification of common objects: Knowledge-driven exploration

    Susan J Lederman;Roberta L Klatzky

  • Visual mediation and the haptic recognition of two-dimensional pictures of common objects.

    Susan J. Lederman;Roberta L. Klatzky;Cynthia Chataway;Craig D. Summers

  • Similarity of tactual and visual picture recognition with limited field of view

    Jack M Loomis;Roberta L Klatzky;Susan J Lederman

  • Semantic factors in cognition

    Roberta L. Klatzky;John Whealdon Cotton

  • Haptic exploration in the presence of vision

    Roberta L. Klatzky;Susan J. Lederman;Dana E. Matula

  • Acquisition of Route and Survey Knowledge in the Absence of Vision

    Roberta L. Klatzky;Jack M. Loomis;Reginald G. Golledge;Joseph G. Cicinelli

  • Cognitive representations of hand posture in ideomotor apraxia.

    Laurel J Buxbaum;Angela Sirigu;Myrna F Schwartz;Roberta Klatzky

  • Tactile roughness perception with a rigid link interposed between skin and surface

    Roberta L. Klatzky;Susan J. Lederman

  • Semantic Factors in Cognition@@@Basic Processes in Reading: Perception and Comprehension@@@Modes of Perceiving and Processing Information

    Mark S. Mayzner;John W. Cotton;Roberta L. Klatzky;David La Berge

Frequent Co-Authors

Susan J. Lederman
Susan J. Lederman Queen's University
Jack M. Loomis
Jack M. Loomis University of California, Santa Barbara
Reginald G. Golledge
Reginald G. Golledge University of California, Santa Barbara
Ralph L. Hollis
Ralph L. Hollis Carnegie Mellon University
Michael A. Peshkin
Michael A. Peshkin Northwestern University
J. Edward Colgate
J. Edward Colgate Northwestern University
Marlene Behrmann
Marlene Behrmann Carnegie Mellon University
Martin Buss
Martin Buss Technical University of Munich
Ming C. Lin
Ming C. Lin University of Maryland, College Park
Dinesh Manocha
Dinesh Manocha University of Maryland, College Park

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a wide variety of online degrees and career pathways. For those seeking flexible entry points, there are several associates degrees that can offer foundational knowledge, often at an accelerated pace and with an accessible workload.

Students considering further specialization or advanced roles might be interested in doctoral programs. For educational professionals and researchers, a cheapest doctorate of education online could be a strategic option, allowing them to balance affordability with career advancement.

It’s also important to select a credible institution. Many learners prefer nationally accredited online colleges to ensure high educational standards, which can play a significant role in future job prospects and degree recognition.

For creative and tech-focused students, pursuing an online video game design degree can open gateways to the fast-growing gaming industry. With so many flexible, affordable options now available online, building a rewarding tech career is increasingly within reach.

Best Scientists Citing Roberta L. Klatzky

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles