World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Constantine Gatsonis

Constantine Gatsonis

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
95
Citations
90263
World Ranking
9828
National Ranking
5050

Constantine Gatsonis publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Constantine Gatsonis sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 264 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Constantine Gatsonis D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Constantine Gatsonis sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1998 - Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA)

Overview

Constantine Gatsonis is affiliated with Brown University in the United States and specializes primarily in the field of Medicine. Their research broadly intersects several subfields, including Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Artificial Intelligence, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Oncology.

Their work engages extensively with topics such as Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research, Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications, Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging, AI in cancer detection, Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging, MRI in cancer diagnosis, and Breast Cancer Treatment Studies.

Some of Constantine Gatsonis's recent published papers include:

  • Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening (2020, JAMA)
  • Association Between Ambient Air Pollution and Amyloid Positron Emission Tomography Positivity in Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment (2020, JAMA Neurology)
  • The Longitudinal Early-onset Alzheimer's Disease Study (LEADS): Framework and methodology (2021, Alzheimer's & Dementia)
  • The Urgency of Care during the Covid-19 Pandemic - Learning as We Go (2020, New England Journal of Medicine)
  • rPOP: Robust PET-only processing of community acquired heterogeneous amyloid-PET data (2021, NeuroImage)

They have collaborated frequently with a group of coauthors, including Gil D. Rabinovici, Renaud La Joie, María C. Carrillo, Lucy Hanna, and Barry A. Siegel.

Their work has been published predominantly in venues such as Alzheimer's & Dementia, UNC Libraries, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Radiology, and JAMA Network Open.

In recognition of their professional contributions, Constantine Gatsonis was named a Fellow of the American Statistical Association in 1998.

Best Publications

  • Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative

    P M Bossuyt;J B Reitsma;D E Bruns;C A Gatsonis

  • Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening.

    Denise R Aberle;Amanda M Adams;Christine D Berg

  • STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies

    Patrick M Bossuyt;Johannes B Reitsma;David E Bruns;Constantine A Gatsonis

  • Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative

    Patrick M Bossuyt;Johannes B Reitsma;David E Bruns;Constantine A Gatsonis

  • The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration

    Patrick M. Bossuyt;Johannes B. Reitsma;David E. Bruns;Constantine A. Gatsonis

  • Diagnostic Performance of Digital versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening

    Etta D. Pisano;Constantine Gatsonis;Edward Hendrick;Martin Yaffe

  • STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.

    Patrick M. Bossuyt;Johannes B. Reitsma;David E. Bruns;Constantine A. Gatsonis

  • Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies The PRISMA-DTA Statement

    Matthew D.F. McInnes;David Moher;Brett D. Thombs;Brett D. Thombs;Trevor A. McGrath

  • STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration

    Jérémie F Cohen;Jérémie F Cohen;Daniël A Korevaar;Douglas G Altman;David E Bruns

  • Management of Pain in Elderly Patients With Cancer

    Roberto Bernabei;Giovanni Gambassi;Kate Lapane;Francesco Landi

  • A hierarchical regression approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations

    Carolyn M. Rutter;Constantine A. Gatsonis

  • The national lung screening trial: Overview and study design

    Constantine A. Gatsonis;Denise R. Aberle;Christine D. Berg;William C. Black

  • Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy

    Mariska M.G. Leeflang;Jonathan J. Deeks;Constantine Gatsonis;Patrick M.M. Bossuyt

  • MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer

    Constance D. Lehman;Constantine Gatsonis;Christiane K. Kuhl;R. Edward Hendrick

  • Rates of avoidable hospitalization by insurance status in Massachusetts and Maryland.

    Joel S. Weissman;Constantine Gatsonis;Arnold M. Epstein

  • Guidelines for Meta-analyses Evaluating Diagnostic Tests

    Les Irwig;Anna N. A. Tosteson;Constantine Gatsonis;Joseph Lau

  • Overdiagnosis in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer

    Edward F. Patz;Paul Pinsky;Constantine Gatsonis;Jo Rean D. Sicks

  • Low-level lead exposure and the IQ of children. A meta-analysis of modern studies.

    Herbert L. Needleman;Constantine A. Gatsonis

  • The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: Explanation and elaboration

    Patrick M. Bossuyt;J. B. Reitsma;D. E. Bruns;Constantine A. Gatsonis

  • STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration. Translation to Russian

    Jérémie F. Cohen;F Cohen Jérémie;Daniël A. Korevaar;A Korevaar Daniël

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick M.M. Bossuyt
Patrick M.M. Bossuyt University of Amsterdam
Johannes B. Reitsma
Johannes B. Reitsma Utrecht University
Paul Glasziou
Paul Glasziou Bond University
Les Irwig
Les Irwig University of Sydney
David Moher
David Moher Ottawa Hospital
Henrica C.W. de Vet
Henrica C.W. de Vet University of Amsterdam
Mitchell D. Schnall
Mitchell D. Schnall University of Pennsylvania
Constance D. Lehman
Constance D. Lehman Harvard University
Arnold M. Epstein
Arnold M. Epstein Harvard University
Gil D. Rabinovici
Gil D. Rabinovici University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA isn’t limited to traditional MD programs. Many students consider nursing and allied health pathways, especially with the growing availability of flexible online options. Aspiring advanced practice nurses can now accelerate their studies with the fastest online dnp programs, designed for those eager to attain leadership and clinical roles in less time.

For those seeking a less hands-on or more theory-focused option, there are also dnp program without clinical hours, making doctoral study more accessible for busy professionals.

Entry-level nursing careers remain in high demand, and the fast track medical lpn programs offer a quicker route for those wanting to enter the workforce fast. Specialized fields are also evolving; those interested in mental health should look into the fastest psychiatric nurse practitioner program for advanced credentials and growing job opportunities.

These options provide a variety of flexible pathways for students seeking health care careers, all from the convenience of online study.

Best Scientists Citing Constantine Gatsonis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles