World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
57
Citations
12190
World Ranking
2646
National Ranking
807

Michael R. Bailey publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael R. Bailey sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 523 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Michael R. Bailey D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael R. Bailey sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael R. Bailey is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with significant contributions to Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Biomedical Engineering, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Materials Chemistry.

The scientist's work centers around several key topics, including:

  • Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
  • Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies
  • Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
  • Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
  • Ultrasound and Cavitation Phenomena
  • Ureteral Procedures and Complications
  • Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research

Some of their recent papers include:

  • Noninvasive acoustic manipulation of objects in a living body, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Removal of Small, Asymptomatic Kidney Stones and Incidence of Relapse, 2022, New England Journal of Medicine
  • First In-Human Burst Wave Lithotripsy for Kidney Stone Comminution: Initial Two Case Studies, 2020, Journal of Endourology
  • First Series Using Ultrasonic Propulsion and Burst Wave Lithotripsy to Treat Ureteral Stones, 2022, The Journal of Urology
  • Quantitative Assessment of Boiling Histotripsy Progression Based on Color Doppler Measurements, 2022, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control

Frequent co-authors of Michael R. Bailey are:

  • Adam D. Maxwell
  • Mathew D. Sorensen
  • Bryan W. Cunitz
  • Barbrina Dunmire
  • Jeff Thiel

Their publications have appeared frequently in venues such as:

  • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
  • The Journal of Urology
  • Journal of Endourology
  • Human Reproduction
  • International Journal for the History of Engineering & Technology

Best Publications

  • Overview of Therapeutic Ultrasound Applications and Safety Considerations

    Douglas L. Miller;Nadine B. Smith;Michael R. Bailey;Gregory J. Czarnota

  • Physical mechanisms of the therapeutic effect of ultrasound (a review)

    M. R. Bailey;V. A. Khokhlova;O. A. Sapozhnikov;S. G. Kargl

  • Real-time visualization of high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment using ultrasound imaging

    Shahram Vaezy;Xuegong Shi;Roy W Martin;Emil Chi

  • An overview of kidney stone imaging techniques

    Wayne Brisbane;Michael R. Bailey;Mathew D. Sorensen;Mathew D. Sorensen

  • Shock Wave Technology and Application: An Update

    Jens J. Rassweiler;Thomas Knoll;Kai Uwe Köhrmann;James A. McAteer

  • Acoustic characterization of high intensity focused ultrasound fields: a combined measurement and modeling approach.

    Michael S. Canney;Michael R. Bailey;Lawrence A. Crum;Vera A. Khokhlova

  • Cavitation clouds created by shock scattering from bubbles during histotripsy.

    Adam D. Maxwell;Tzu Yin Wang;Charles A. Cain;J. Brian Fowlkes

  • Blood vessel deformations on microsecond time scales by ultrasonic cavitation.

    Hong Chen;Wayne Kreider;Andrew A. Brayman;Michael R. Bailey

  • Effects of nonlinear propagation, cavitation, and boiling in lesion formation by high intensity focused ultrasound in a gel phantom

    Vera A. Khokhlova;Michael R. Bailey;Justin A. Reed;Bryan W. Cunitz

  • Cavitation Bubble Cluster Activity in the Breakage of Kidney Stones by Lithotripter Shockwaves

    Yuriy A. Pishchalnikov;Oleg A. Sapozhnikov;Michael R. Bailey;James C. Williams

  • Shock-induced heating and millisecond boiling in gels and tissue due to high intensity focused ultrasound.

    Michael S. Canney;Vera A. Khokhlova;Vera A. Khokhlova;Olga V. Bessonova;Michael R. Bailey

  • Radiation force of an arbitrary acoustic beam on an elastic sphere in a fluid

    Oleg A. Sapozhnikov;Michael R. Bailey

  • Controlled tissue emulsification produced by high intensity focused ultrasound shock waves and millisecond boiling.

    Tatiana D. Khokhlova;Michael S. Canney;Vera A. Khokhlova;Oleg A. Sapozhnikov

  • Use of overpressure to assess the role of bubbles in focused ultrasound lesion shape in vitro

    Michael R. Bailey;Lisa N. Couret;Oleg A. Sapozhnikov;Vera A. Khokhlova

  • A mechanistic analysis of stone fracture in lithotripsy

    Oleg A. Sapozhnikov;Adam D. Maxwell;Brian MacConaghy;Michael R. Bailey

  • Hemostasis of punctured blood vessels using high-intensity focused ultrasound

    Shahram Vaezy;Roy Martin;Hadi Yaziji;Peter Kaczkowski

  • Kidney Damage and Renal Functional Changes are Minimized by Waveform Control that Suppresses Cavitation in Shock Wave Lithotripsy

    Andrew P. Evan;Lynn R. Willis;James A. McAteer;Michael R. Bailey

  • Effect of overpressure and pulse repetition frequency on cavitation in shock wave lithotripsy

    Oleg A. Sapozhnikov;Vera A. Khokhlova;Michael R. Bailey;James C. Williams

  • Characterization of a multi-element clinical HIFU system using acoustic holography and nonlinear modeling

    W. Kreider;P. V. Yuldashev;O. A. Sapozhnikov;N. Farr

  • Effect of high-intensity focused ultrasound on whole blood with and without microbubble contrast agent

    Sandra L B Poliachik;Wayne L. Chandler;Pierre D. Mourad;Michael R. Bailey

Frequent Co-Authors

Oleg A. Sapozhnikov
Oleg A. Sapozhnikov Lomonosov Moscow State University
Lawrence A. Crum
Lawrence A. Crum University of Washington
Vera A. Khokhlova
Vera A. Khokhlova Lomonosov Moscow State University
Robin O. Cleveland
Robin O. Cleveland University of Oxford
Andrew P. Evan
Andrew P. Evan Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis
Thomas J. Matula
Thomas J. Matula University of Washington
Tim Colonius
Tim Colonius California Institute of Technology
James E. Lingeman
James E. Lingeman Indiana University
Charles A. Cain
Charles A. Cain University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Zhen Xu
Zhen Xu University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Michael R. Bailey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles