World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Stephanie N. Mullins-Sweatt

Stephanie N. Mullins-Sweatt

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
36
Citations
9616
World Ranking
9343
National Ranking
4941

Stephanie N. Mullins-Sweatt publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephanie N. Mullins-Sweatt sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 84 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Stephanie N. Mullins-Sweatt D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephanie N. Mullins-Sweatt sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephanie N. Mullins-Sweatt is affiliated with Oklahoma State University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of psychology, particularly in areas related to personality disorders and psychopathology. Their research portfolio includes 40 publications primarily focused on psychology, with significant work in clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, and philosophy.

The main topics addressed in their work encompass personality disorders and psychopathology, mental health and psychiatry, mental health research topics, psychotherapy techniques and applications, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, suicide and self-harm studies, and personality traits and psychology.

Frequently published venues for their research include:

  • Assessment
  • Personality and Mental Health
  • Personality Disorders Theory Research and Treatment
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • Annual Review of Clinical Psychology

Their recent publications cover various aspects of psychopathology and assessment. Some notable papers include:

  • The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A Quantitative Nosology Based on Consensus of Evidence, 2021, Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
  • The distinction between symptoms and traits in the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP), 2020, Journal of Personality
  • Development of Measures for the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A Collaborative Scale Development Project, 2021, Assessment
  • HiTOP Assessment of Externalizing Antagonism and Disinhibition, 2021, Assessment
  • State of the Science: The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP), 2024, Behavior Therapy

Collaboration plays a significant role in their scientific contributions. Frequent co-authors include Thomas A. Widiger, Jiwon Min, Roman Kotov, David C. Cicero, and Leonard J. Simms.

Best Publications

  • The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A Dimensional Alternative to Traditional Nosologies

    Roman Kotov;Robert F. Krueger;David Watson;Thomas M. Achenbach

  • Assessing the basic traits associated with psychopathy: Development and validation of the Elemental Psychopathy Assessment.

    Donald R. Lynam;Eric T. Gaughan;Joshua D. Miller;Drew J. Miller

  • Progress in achieving quantitative classification of psychopathology

    Robert F. Krueger;Roman Kotov;David Watson;Miriam K. Forbes

  • The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A Quantitative Nosology Based on Consensus of Evidence.

    Roman Kotov;Robert F. Krueger;David Watson;David C. Cicero

  • A Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology Can Transform Mental Health Research

    Christopher C. Conway;Miriam K. Forbes;Kelsie T. Forbush;Eiko I. Fried

  • The time has come for dimensional personality disorder diagnosis

    Christopher J. Hopwood;Roman Kotov;Robert F. Krueger;David Watson

  • Integrating the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) into clinical practice

    Camilo J. Ruggero;Roman Kotov;Christopher J. Hopwood;Michael First

  • Psychometric Properties of an Abbreviated Instrument of the Five-Factor Model:

    Stephanie N. Mullins-Sweatt;Janetta E. Jamerson;Douglas B. Samuel;David R. Olson

  • Five-Factor Model of Personality Disorder: A Proposal for DSM-V

    Thomas A. Widiger;Stephanie N. Mullins-Sweatt

  • The search for the successful psychopath

    Stephanie N. Mullins-Sweatt;Natalie G. Glover;Karen J. Derefinko;Joshua D. Miller

  • Personality in a Hierarchical Model of Psychopathology

    Thomas A. Widiger;Martin Sellbom;Michael Chmielewski;Lee Anna Clark

  • Criterion A of the AMPD in HiTOP

    Thomas A. Widiger;Bo Bach;Michael Chmielewski;Lee Anna Clark

  • Comparing models of counterproductive workplace behaviors: The Five-Factor Model and the Dark Triad

    Hilary L. DeShong;DeMond M. Grant;Stephanie N. Mullins-Sweatt

  • Five-Factor Measure of Borderline Personality Traits

    Stephanie N Mullins-Sweatt;Maryanne Edmundson;Shannon Sauer-Zavala;Donald R Lynam

  • Clinical Utility and DSM-V

    Stephanie N. Mullins-Sweatt;Thomas A. Widiger

  • Redefining Phenotypes to Advance Psychiatric Genetics: Implications From Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology

    Monika A. Waszczuk;Nicholas R. Eaton;Robert F. Krueger;Alexander J. Shackman

  • Clinical Utility of a Dimensional Model of Personality Disorder

    Thomas A. Widiger;Stephanie N. Mullins-Sweatt

  • The Five-Factor Model of Personality Disorder: A Translation across Science and Practice.

    Stephanie N. Mullins-Sweatt;Thomas A. Widiger

  • The distinction between symptoms and traits in the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP).

    Colin G DeYoung;Michael Chmielewski;Lee Anna Clark;David M Condon

  • Development of Measures for the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A Collaborative Scale Development Project:

    Leonard J. Simms;Aidan G. C. Wright;David Cicero;Roman Kotov

  • Clinical utility of the Five-Factor Model of personality disorder.

    Stephanie N. Mullins‐Sweatt;Gregory J. Lengel

  • Retention oR Deletion of PeRsonality DisoRDeR Diagnoses foR DsM-5: an exPeRt Consensus aPPRoaCh

    Stephanie N Mullins-Sweatt;David P Bernstein;Thomas A Widiger

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas A. Widiger
Thomas A. Widiger University of Kentucky
Joshua D. Miller
Joshua D. Miller University of Georgia
Douglas B. Samuel
Douglas B. Samuel Purdue University West Lafayette
Robert F. Krueger
Robert F. Krueger University of Minnesota
Donald R. Lynam
Donald R. Lynam Purdue University West Lafayette
Roman Kotov
Roman Kotov Stony Brook University
Aidan G. C. Wright
Aidan G. C. Wright University of Pittsburgh
David Watson
David Watson University of Notre Dame
Nicholas R. Eaton
Nicholas R. Eaton Stony Brook University
Jennifer L. Tackett
Jennifer L. Tackett Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees in the USA is a flexible and popular option for students seeking diverse career pathways. Many accredited universities now offer accelerated programs that help students complete their studies quickly and conveniently from anywhere. These programs are ideal for working adults or those aiming to enter the workforce sooner.

If you're in the Southwest, you might consider fastest online psychology degree programs in Arizona, known for combining speed and academic quality. Similarly, students in Texas can take advantage of fastest online psychology bachelor's degrees in Houston, which offer a range of specialty areas and flexible scheduling.

In Florida, highly-ranked universities provide accelerated online psychology bachelor's degrees in Florida for those looking to jumpstart their careers in mental health, research, or counseling. Meanwhile, the fastest online psychology degree programs in Colorado allow students to pursue psychology in lively, innovative online environments.

Graduates can pursue careers in clinical settings, human resources, education, social services, or continue with advanced degrees. Online programs also often provide networking opportunities, internships, and career support tailored to their region and specialization.

Best Scientists Citing Stephanie N. Mullins-Sweatt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles