World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Stephanie N. Mullins-Sweatt

Stephanie N. Mullins-Sweatt

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 36 9343 8733 4941 4501 84 9616

Stephanie N. Mullins-Sweatt publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Stephanie N. Mullins-Sweatt between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Stephanie N. Mullins-Sweatt published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 4.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2019. 13 of the 95 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2019. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 4 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 5 publications
2004 2025

95 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Stephanie N. Mullins-Sweatt: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 1
2006 3
2007 2
2008 1
2009 4
2010 3
2011 4
2012 4
2013 6
2014 2
2015 3
2016 7
2017 7
2018 5
2019 10
2020 6
2021 7
2022 2
2023 4
2024 8
2025 5
Total 95
Download as CSV

Stephanie N. Mullins-Sweatt publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephanie N. Mullins-Sweatt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 84 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 84
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Stephanie N. Mullins-Sweatt D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephanie N. Mullins-Sweatt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 36
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Stephanie N. Mullins-Sweatt is affiliated with Oklahoma State University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of psychology, particularly in areas related to personality disorders and psychopathology. Their research portfolio includes 40 publications primarily focused on psychology, with significant work in clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, and philosophy.

The main topics addressed in their work encompass personality disorders and psychopathology, mental health and psychiatry, mental health research topics, psychotherapy techniques and applications, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, suicide and self-harm studies, and personality traits and psychology.

Frequently published venues for their research include:

  • Assessment
  • Personality and Mental Health
  • Personality Disorders Theory Research and Treatment
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • Annual Review of Clinical Psychology

Their recent publications cover various aspects of psychopathology and assessment. Some notable papers include:

  • The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A Quantitative Nosology Based on Consensus of Evidence, 2021, Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
  • The distinction between symptoms and traits in the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP), 2020, Journal of Personality
  • Development of Measures for the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A Collaborative Scale Development Project, 2021, Assessment
  • HiTOP Assessment of Externalizing Antagonism and Disinhibition, 2021, Assessment
  • State of the Science: The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP), 2024, Behavior Therapy

Collaboration plays a significant role in their scientific contributions. Frequent co-authors include Thomas A. Widiger, Jiwon Min, Roman Kotov, David C. Cicero, and Leonard J. Simms.

Best Publications

  • The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A Dimensional Alternative to Traditional Nosologies

    Roman Kotov;Robert F. Krueger;David Watson;Thomas M. Achenbach

  • Assessing the basic traits associated with psychopathy: Development and validation of the Elemental Psychopathy Assessment.

    Donald R. Lynam;Eric T. Gaughan;Joshua D. Miller;Drew J. Miller

  • Progress in achieving quantitative classification of psychopathology

    Robert F. Krueger;Roman Kotov;David Watson;Miriam K. Forbes

  • A Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology Can Transform Mental Health Research

    Christopher C. Conway;Miriam K. Forbes;Kelsie T. Forbush;Eiko I. Fried

  • The time has come for dimensional personality disorder diagnosis

    Christopher J. Hopwood;Roman Kotov;Robert F. Krueger;David Watson

  • Integrating the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) into clinical practice

    Camilo J. Ruggero;Roman Kotov;Christopher J. Hopwood;Michael First

  • Psychometric Properties of an Abbreviated Instrument of the Five-Factor Model:

    Stephanie N. Mullins-Sweatt;Janetta E. Jamerson;Douglas B. Samuel;David R. Olson

  • Five-Factor Model of Personality Disorder: A Proposal for DSM-V

    Thomas A. Widiger;Stephanie N. Mullins-Sweatt

  • The search for the successful psychopath

    Stephanie N. Mullins-Sweatt;Natalie G. Glover;Karen J. Derefinko;Joshua D. Miller

  • Personality in a Hierarchical Model of Psychopathology

    Thomas A. Widiger;Martin Sellbom;Michael Chmielewski;Lee Anna Clark

  • Criterion A of the AMPD in HiTOP

    Thomas A. Widiger;Bo Bach;Michael Chmielewski;Lee Anna Clark

  • Comparing models of counterproductive workplace behaviors: The Five-Factor Model and the Dark Triad

    Hilary L. DeShong;DeMond M. Grant;Stephanie N. Mullins-Sweatt

  • Five-Factor Measure of Borderline Personality Traits

    Stephanie N Mullins-Sweatt;Maryanne Edmundson;Shannon Sauer-Zavala;Donald R Lynam

  • Clinical Utility and DSM-V

    Stephanie N. Mullins-Sweatt;Thomas A. Widiger

  • Redefining Phenotypes to Advance Psychiatric Genetics: Implications From Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology

    Monika A. Waszczuk;Nicholas R. Eaton;Robert F. Krueger;Alexander J. Shackman

  • Clinical Utility of a Dimensional Model of Personality Disorder

    Thomas A. Widiger;Stephanie N. Mullins-Sweatt

  • The Five-Factor Model of Personality Disorder: A Translation across Science and Practice.

    Stephanie N. Mullins-Sweatt;Thomas A. Widiger

  • Development of Measures for the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A Collaborative Scale Development Project:

    Leonard J. Simms;Aidan G. C. Wright;David Cicero;Roman Kotov

  • Clinical utility of the Five-Factor Model of personality disorder.

    Stephanie N. Mullins‐Sweatt;Gregory J. Lengel

  • Retention oR Deletion of PeRsonality DisoRDeR Diagnoses foR DsM-5: an exPeRt Consensus aPPRoaCh

    Stephanie N Mullins-Sweatt;David P Bernstein;Thomas A Widiger

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas A. Widiger
Thomas A. Widiger University of Kentucky
Joshua D. Miller
Joshua D. Miller University of Georgia
Douglas B. Samuel
Douglas B. Samuel Purdue University West Lafayette
Robert F. Krueger
Robert F. Krueger University of Minnesota
Donald R. Lynam
Donald R. Lynam Purdue University West Lafayette
Roman Kotov
Roman Kotov Stony Brook University
Aidan G. C. Wright
Aidan G. C. Wright University of Pittsburgh
David Watson
David Watson University of Notre Dame
Nicholas R. Eaton
Nicholas R. Eaton Stony Brook University
Jennifer L. Tackett
Jennifer L. Tackett Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees in the USA is a flexible and popular option for students seeking diverse career pathways. Many accredited universities now offer accelerated programs that help students complete their studies quickly and conveniently from anywhere. These programs are ideal for working adults or those aiming to enter the workforce sooner.

If you're in the Southwest, you might consider fastest online psychology degree programs in Arizona, known for combining speed and academic quality. Similarly, students in Texas can take advantage of fastest online psychology bachelor's degrees in Houston, which offer a range of specialty areas and flexible scheduling.

In Florida, highly-ranked universities provide accelerated online psychology bachelor's degrees in Florida for those looking to jumpstart their careers in mental health, research, or counseling. Meanwhile, the fastest online psychology degree programs in Colorado allow students to pursue psychology in lively, innovative online environments.

Graduates can pursue careers in clinical settings, human resources, education, social services, or continue with advanced degrees. Online programs also often provide networking opportunities, internships, and career support tailored to their region and specialization.

Best Scientists Citing Stephanie N. Mullins-Sweatt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles