World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 126 2950 2752 1635 1504 754 61177

Vincent Mor publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Vincent Mor between 1982 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Vincent Mor published across 44 years, from 1982 to 2025, averaging 18.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 58 publications in 2017. 28 of the 827 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 58. Peak 58 publications in 2017. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 4 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 10 publications 1986: 9 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 12 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 10 publications 1991: 14 publications 1992: 12 publications 1993: 11 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 16 publications 1998: 11 publications 1999: 11 publications 2000: 14 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 14 publications 2004: 21 publications 2005: 24 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 20 publications 2008: 24 publications 2009: 20 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 24 publications 2012: 22 publications 2013: 25 publications 2014: 38 publications 2015: 25 publications 2016: 27 publications 2017: 58 publications 2018: 54 publications 2019: 43 publications 2020: 40 publications 2021: 43 publications 2022: 35 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 22 publications 2025: 6 publications
1982 2025

827 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Vincent Mor: publications per year, 1982 to 2025
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 4
1984 5
1985 10
1986 9
1987 4
1988 12
1989 6
1990 10
1991 14
1992 12
1993 11
1994 8
1995 9
1996 6
1997 16
1998 11
1999 11
2000 14
2001 13
2002 11
2003 14
2004 21
2005 24
2006 8
2007 20
2008 24
2009 20
2010 18
2011 24
2012 22
2013 25
2014 38
2015 25
2016 27
2017 58
2018 54
2019 43
2020 40
2021 43
2022 35
2023 19
2024 22
2025 6
Total 827
Download as CSV

Vincent Mor publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vincent Mor sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 741–760 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 754 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230 754
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Vincent Mor D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vincent Mor sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 126–127 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 126 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252 126
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)

Overview

Vincent Mor is affiliated with Brown University in the United States and focuses primarily on medical research related to aging, long-term care, and health professions. Their work encompasses a wide array of topics addressing the complexities of geriatric care and health outcomes, particularly within nursing home settings.

Their research fields include Medicine and Health Professions, with notable subfield concentrations in General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Health, and Infectious Diseases.

Main topics of their scholarly work cover:

  • Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Frailty in Older Adults
  • Healthcare Policy and Management
  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy

Frequent publication venues where their research appears include:

  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
  • Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
  • Innovation in Aging
  • Health Affairs
  • JAMA Network Open

Among recent papers are:

  • "Nursing Home Care in Crisis in the Wake of COVID-19" (2020), published in JAMA
  • "Risk Factors Associated With All-Cause 30-Day Mortality in Nursing Home Residents With COVID-19" (2021), published in JAMA Internal Medicine
  • "A systematic review of long-term care facility characteristics associated with COVID-19 outcomes" (2021), published in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
  • "Growth In Medicare Advantage Greatest Among Black And Hispanic Enrollees" (2021), published in Health Affairs
  • "Variation in SARS-CoV-2 Prevalence in U.S. Skilled Nursing Facilities" (2020), published in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Frequent co-authors collaborating with them include:

  • Stefan Gravenstein
  • Elizabeth M. White
  • Momotazur Rahman
  • Ellen McCreedy
  • Richard A. Feifer

Vincent Mor has also contributed to book publications, including a work published by Homo Politicus (Academy of Humanities and Economics in Lodz): "interRAI Long-Term Care Facilities (LTCF) Assessment Form and User's Manual" (2020).

The scientist is a member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) since 2015, highlighting a recognized position within the medical research community.

Best Publications

  • MDS Cognitive Performance Scale

    John N. Morris;Brant E. Fries;David R. Mehr;Catherine Hawes

  • Family perspectives on end-of-life care at the last place of care.

    Joan M. Teno;Brian R. Clarridge;Virginia Casey;Lisa C. Welch

  • Management of Pain in Elderly Patients With Cancer

    Roberto Bernabei;Giovanni Gambassi;Kate Lapane;Francesco Landi

  • The Karnofsky Performance Status Scale. An examination of its reliability and validity in a research setting.

    Vincent Mor;Linda Laliberte;John N. Morris;Michael Wiemann

  • Designing the national resident assessment instrument for nursing homes

    John N. Morris;Catherine Hawes;Brant E. Fries;Charles D. Phillips

  • Use of comprehensive geriatric assessment in older cancer patients: recommendations from the task force on CGA of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG).

    Martine Extermann;Matti Aapro;Roberto Bernabei;Harvey Jay Cohen

  • Change in End-of-Life Care for Medicare Beneficiaries: Site of Death, Place of Care, and Health Care Transitions in 2000, 2005, and 2009

    Joan M. Teno;Pedro L. Gozalo;Julie P. W. Bynum;Natalie E. Leland

  • Reliability Estimates for The Minimum Data Set for Nursing Home Resident Assessment and Care Screening (MDS)

    Catherine Hawes;John N. Morris;Charles D. Phillips;Vincent Mor

  • Randomised trial of impact of model of integrated care and case management for older people living in the community

    Roberto Bernabei;Francesco Landi;Giovanni Gambassi;Antonio Sgadari

  • The Revolving Door Of Rehospitalization From Skilled Nursing Facilities

    Vincent Mor;Orna Intrator;Zhanlian Feng;David C. Grabowski

  • Driven to Tiers: Socioeconomic and Racial Disparities in the Quality of Nursing Home Care

    Vincent Mor;Jacqueline Zinn;Joseph Angelelli;Joan M. Teno;Joan M. Teno

  • End-of-life transitions among nursing home residents with cognitive issues.

    Pedro Gozalo;Joan M Teno;Susan L Mitchell;Jon Skinner

  • Quality of life in persons with human immunodeficiency virus infection: measurement by the Medical Outcomes Study instrument.

    Tom Wachtel;John Piette;Vincent Mor;Michael Stein

  • Risk of functional decline among well elders.

    Vincent Mor;John Murphy;Susan Masterson-Allen;Cynthia Willey;Cynthia Willey

  • Functional transitions among the elderly: patterns, predictors, and related hospital use.

    V Mor;V Wilcox;W Rakowski;J Hiris

  • A National Study of the Location of Death for Older Persons with Dementia

    Susan L. Mitchell;Joan M. Teno;Susan C. Miller;Vincent Mor

  • Clinical symptoms and length of survival in patients with terminal cancer.

    David B. Reuben;Vincent Mor;Jeff Hiris

  • Dyspnea in Terminally Ill Cancer Patients

    David B. Reuben;Vincent Mor

  • Principles for modeling propensity scores in medical research: a systematic literature review

    Sherry Weitzen;Kate L. Lapane;Alicia Y. Toledano;Anne L. Hume;Anne L. Hume

  • Correlates and Management of Nonmalignant Pain in the Nursing Home

    Aida Won;Kate Lapane;Giovanni Gambassi;Roberto Bernabei

Frequent Co-Authors

Joan M. Teno
Joan M. Teno Brown University
Susan L. Mitchell
Susan L. Mitchell Harvard University
Kate L. Lapane
Kate L. Lapane University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Stefan Gravenstein
Stefan Gravenstein Brown University
Edward Alan Miller
Edward Alan Miller University of Massachusetts Boston
Roberto Bernabei
Roberto Bernabei Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
John D. Piette
John D. Piette University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Francesco Landi
Francesco Landi Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic
Melissa A. Clark
Melissa A. Clark Brown University
Michael D. Stein
Michael D. Stein Boston University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the healthcare field continues to evolve, there are more online pathways than ever for advancing your medical career. Pursuing an online nutritionist degree is a great option for those interested in wellness and preventative care, offering flexible learning for busy schedules.

If you’re looking toward leadership roles, choosing the right graduate program is crucial. Understanding how to evaluate healthcare administration degree programs can help you identify accredited options that meet industry standards and open up advanced management opportunities.

Registered nurses aiming to complete their bachelor’s can explore online RN to BSN programs no clinicals, which offer accelerated, flexible coursework without additional hands-on training. This route provides career advancement and can prepare you for leadership or specialized nursing roles.

For those ready to move into the highest levels of practice, consider the shortest DNP program online. Earning a Doctor of Nursing Practice online allows you to achieve clinical expertise and executive leadership skills in a streamlined format.

Best Scientists Citing Vincent Mor

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles