World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Rebecca A. Silliman

Rebecca A. Silliman

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 73 19716 18497 9819 9052 236 16013

Rebecca A. Silliman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rebecca A. Silliman between 1976 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rebecca A. Silliman published across 50 years, from 1976 to 2025, averaging 4.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2007. 2 of the 235 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2007. 1976: 2 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 10 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 17 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 1 publication
1976 2025

235 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rebecca A. Silliman: publications per year, 1976 to 2025
Year Publications
1976 2
1977 1
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 1
1983 0
1984 1
1985 0
1986 2
1987 5
1988 10
1989 4
1990 6
1991 2
1992 0
1993 2
1994 4
1995 4
1996 2
1997 2
1998 2
1999 5
2000 8
2001 10
2002 5
2003 8
2004 6
2005 10
2006 10
2007 17
2008 10
2009 14
2010 12
2011 12
2012 14
2013 11
2014 11
2015 6
2016 5
2017 4
2018 2
2019 2
2020 1
2021 0
2022 0
2023 0
2024 1
2025 1
Total 235
Download as CSV

Rebecca A. Silliman publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rebecca A. Silliman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 221–240 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 236 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487 236
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Rebecca A. Silliman D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rebecca A. Silliman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 72–73 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391 73
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Rebecca A. Silliman is affiliated with Boston University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with specific focus on Pharmacology, Cancer Research, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Genetics, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

Their work concentrates on topics including Estrogen and related hormone effects, Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism, Breast Cancer Treatment Studies, Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues, Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life, Frailty in Older Adults, and Public Policy and Administration Research.

Significant recent publications by Rebecca A. Silliman include:

  • Defining Undertreatment and Overtreatment in Older Adults With Cancer: A Scoping Literature Review, 2020, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Shifting Priorities: Participatory Budgeting in New York City is Associated with Increased Investments in Schools, Street and Traffic Improvements, and Public Housing, 2020, New Political Science
  • Metabolic Pathway Analysis and Effectiveness of Tamoxifen in Danish Breast Cancer Patients, 2020, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
  • The Population-level Effect of Adjuvant Therapies on Breast Cancer Recurrence: Application of the Trend-in-Trend Design, 2024, Epidemiology
  • Risk of death and hospital admission for major medical events after initiation of psychotropic medications in older adults admitted to nursing homes, 2020, UNC Libraries

Frequent co-authors working alongside Rebecca A. Silliman include:

  • Thomas P. Ahern
  • Lindsay J. Collin
  • Anders Kjærsgaard
  • Peer Christiansen
  • Timothy L. Lash

Key venues for their published work are:

  • UNC Libraries
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • New Political Science
  • Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
  • Epidemiology

Best Publications

  • Breast Cancer Among the Oldest Old: Tumor Characteristics, Treatment Choices, and Survival

    Mara A. Schonberg;Edward R. Marcantonio;Donglin Li;Rebecca A. Silliman

  • The eight-item modified Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey: psychometric evaluation showed excellent performance.

    André Moser;Andreas E. Stuck;Rebecca A. Silliman;Patricia A. Ganz

  • Statin Prescriptions and Breast Cancer Recurrence Risk: A Danish Nationwide Prospective Cohort Study

    Thomas P. Ahern;Lars Pedersen;Maja Tarp;Deirdre P. Cronin-Fenton

  • A most stubborn bias: No adjustment method fully resolves confounding by indication in observational studies

    Jaclyn Lee Fong Bosco;Rebecca A. Silliman;Soe Soe Thwin;Ann M. Geiger

  • Adherence to tamoxifen over the five-year course

    Timothy L. Lash;Matthew P. Fox;Jennifer L. Westrup;Aliza K. Fink

  • Breast cancer in older women: quality of life and psychosocial adjustment in the 15 months after diagnosis.

    Patricia A. Ganz;Edward Guadagnoli;Mary Beth Landrum;Timothy L. Lash

  • Sexuality after treatment for early prostate cancer: exploring the meanings of "erectile dysfunction".

    Barbara G. Bokhour;Jack A. Clark;Jack A. Clark;Thomas S. Inui;Rebecca A. Silliman

  • Predictors of Tamoxifen Discontinuation Among Older Women With Estrogen Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer

    Cynthia Owusu;Diana S. M. Buist;Terry S. Field;Timothy L. Lash

  • Adjuvant Tamoxifen: Predictors of Use, Side Effects, and Discontinuation in Older Women

    Serkalem Demissie;Rebecca A. Silliman;Timothy L. Lash

  • A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Automated Exercise Coach for Older Adults

    Timothy W. Bickmore;Rebecca A. Silliman;Kerrie Nelson;Debbie M. Cheng

  • Patient Beliefs and Tamoxifen Discontinuance in Older Women With Estrogen Receptor—Positive Breast Cancer

    Aliza K. Fink;Jerry H. Gurwitz;William Rakowski;Edward Guadagnoli

  • Health behavior changes after genetic risk assessment for Alzheimer disease: The REVEAL Study.

    Serena Chao;J. Scott Roberts;Theresa M. Marteau;Rebecca Silliman

  • Usability of conversational agents by patients with inadequate health literacy: evidence from two clinical trials.

    Timothy W. Bickmore;Laura M. Pfeifer;Donna Byron;Shaula Forsythe

  • Blood pressure and survival in the oldest old

    Daniel J. Oates;Dan R. Berlowitz;Mark E. Glickman;Rebecca A. Silliman

  • Patients' perceptions of quality of life after treatment for early prostate cancer

    Jack A. Clark;Thomas S. Inui;Rebecca A. Silliman;Barbara G. Bokhour

  • Age as a Predictor of Diagnostic and Initial Treatment Intensity in Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Patients

    Rebecca A. Silliman;Edward Guadagnoli;Alan B. Weitberg;Vincent Mor

  • Communication Between Physicians and Older Women With Localized Breast Cancer: Implications for Treatment and Patient Satisfaction

    Wenchi Liang;Caroline B. Burnett;Julia H. Rowland;Neal J. Meropol

  • Older Breast Cancer Survivors: Geriatric Assessment Domains Are Associated With Poor Tolerance of Treatment Adverse Effects and Predict Mortality Over 7 Years of Follow-Up

    Kerri M. Clough-Gorr;Andreas E. Stuck;Soe Soe Thwin;Rebecca A. Silliman

  • The impact of age, marital status, and physician‐patient interactions on the care of older women with breast carcinoma

    Rebecca A. Silliman M.D.;Susan L. Troyan;Edward Guadagnoli;M.P.H. Sherrie H. Kaplan Ph.D.

  • Oral Health Problems and Significant Weight Loss Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults

    Christine S. Ritchie;Kaumudi Joshipura;Rebecca A. Silliman;Barbara Miller

Frequent Co-Authors

Diana S. M. Buist
Diana S. M. Buist Kaiser Permanente
Henrik Toft Sørensen
Henrik Toft Sørensen Aarhus University
Patricia A. Ganz
Patricia A. Ganz University of California, Los Angeles
Kenneth J. Rothman
Kenneth J. Rothman Boston University
Vincent Mor
Vincent Mor Brown University
Jeanne S. Mandelblatt
Jeanne S. Mandelblatt Georgetown University
Edward R. Marcantonio
Edward R. Marcantonio Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Hope S. Rugo
Hope S. Rugo University of California, San Francisco
Nancy L. Keating
Nancy L. Keating Harvard University
Arti Hurria
Arti Hurria City Of Hope National Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re exploring options beyond traditional medical school, there are a variety of related online degrees and career pathways that can launch or advance your career in healthcare. Many students consider direct entry nursing programs as an accessible route into nursing, often designed for those with a non-nursing bachelor’s degree.

For students concerned about admission exams, there are also nursing school that does not require teas test, making the entry process smoother.

Careers in medical administration are also in demand. Completing an online healthcare administration degree can prepare you for management roles in clinics, hospitals, or public health organizations.

Alternatively, joining the growing field of medical records can be streamlined by enrolling in one of several medical billing and coding schools that accept financial aid, opening the door to flexible, remote career opportunities.

Each of these pathways offers unique opportunities that support the diverse needs and backgrounds of those pursuing a future in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Rebecca A. Silliman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles