World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 82 16045 15095 8075 7470 445 26536

Supriya G. Mohile publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Supriya G. Mohile between 2005 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Supriya G. Mohile published across 22 years, from 2005 to 2026, averaging 26 papers a year. Output peaked at 48 publications in 2019. 31 of the 571 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 48. Peak 48 publications in 2019. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 4 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 24 publications 2012: 36 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 32 publications 2015: 21 publications 2016: 42 publications 2017: 34 publications 2018: 31 publications 2019: 48 publications 2020: 48 publications 2021: 46 publications 2022: 33 publications 2023: 35 publications 2024: 36 publications 2025: 30 publications 2026: 1 publication
2005 2026

571 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Supriya G. Mohile: publications per year, 2005 to 2026
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 4
2007 10
2008 9
2009 17
2010 16
2011 24
2012 36
2013 17
2014 32
2015 21
2016 42
2017 34
2018 31
2019 48
2020 48
2021 46
2022 33
2023 35
2024 36
2025 30
2026 1
Total 571
Download as CSV

Supriya G. Mohile publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Supriya G. Mohile sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 441–460 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 445 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771 445
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Supriya G. Mohile D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Supriya G. Mohile sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82–83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027 82
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Supriya G. Mohile is affiliated with the University of Rochester Medical Center in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Medicine, with particular emphasis on subfields including Geriatrics and Gerontology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Oncology, Economics and Econometrics, and Physiology.

The main research topics covered in their work include Frailty in Older Adults, Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues, Cancer Survivorship and Care, Nutrition and Health in Aging, Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life, Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare, and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life.

The publication record features several recent notable papers:

  • Evaluation of geriatric assessment and management on the toxic effects of cancer treatment (GAP70+), 2021, The Lancet
  • Older adult participation in cancer clinical trials: A systematic review of barriers and interventions, 2020, CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians
  • Development and Validation of a Risk Tool for Predicting Severe Toxicity in Older Adults Receiving Chemotherapy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer, 2021, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Older adults with cancer and their caregivers - current landscape and future directions for clinical care, 2020, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
  • Overview of Sankey flow diagrams: Focusing on symptom trajectories in older adults with advanced cancer, 2022, Journal of Geriatric Oncology

Frequent co-authors in their work include Kah Poh Loh, Eva Culakova, Allison Magnuson, Marie Flannery, and Mostafa Mohamed.

Supriya G. Mohile's publications often appear in journals such as the Journal of Geriatric Oncology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, JCO Oncology Practice, The Oncologist, and JAMA Network Open.

Best Publications

  • Predicting Chemotherapy Toxicity in Older Adults With Cancer: A Prospective Multicenter Study

    Arti Hurria;Kayo Togawa;Supriya G. Mohile;Cynthia Owusu

  • International Society of Geriatric Oncology Consensus on Geriatric Assessment in Older Patients With Cancer

    Hans Wildiers;Pieter Heeren;Martine Puts;Eva Topinkova

  • Practical assessment and management of vulnerabilities in older patients receiving chemotherapy: Asco guideline for geriatric oncology

    Supriya G. Mohile;William Dale;Mark R. Somerfield;Mara A. Schonberg

  • Screening tools for multidimensional health problems warranting a geriatric assessment in older cancer patients: an update on SIOG recommendations

    L Decoster;K Van Puyvelde;S Mohile;U Wedding

  • Validation of a Prediction Tool for Chemotherapy Toxicity in Older Adults With Cancer

    Arti Hurria;Supriya Mohile;Ajeet Gajra;Heidi Klepin

  • An update on cancer- and chemotherapy-related cognitive dysfunction: current status.

    Michelle C. Janelsins;Sadhna Kohli;Supriya G. Mohile;Kenneth Usuki

  • Improving the Evidence Base for Treating Older Adults With Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Statement

    Arti Hurria;Laura A. Levit;William Dale;Supriya G. Mohile

  • Cognitive Complaints in Survivors of Breast Cancer After Chemotherapy Compared With Age-Matched Controls: An Analysis From a Nationwide, Multicenter, Prospective Longitudinal Study

    Michelle C. Janelsins;Charles E. Heckler;Luke J. Peppone;Charles Kamen

  • Potentially Curable Pancreatic Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline

    Alok A. Khorana;Pamela B. Mangu;Jordan Berlin;Anitra Engebretson

  • Evaluation of geriatric assessment and management on the toxic effects of cancer treatment (GAP70+): a cluster-randomised study.

    Supriya G Mohile;Supriya G Mohile;Mostafa R Mohamed;Huiwen Xu;Eva Culakova

  • Effect of a Patient-Centered Communication Intervention on Oncologist-Patient Communication, Quality of Life, and Health Care Utilization in Advanced Cancer: The VOICE Randomized Clinical Trial

    Ronald M. Epstein;Paul R. Duberstein;Joshua J. Fenton;Kevin Fiscella

  • End Points and Trial Design in Geriatric Oncology Research: A Joint European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer–Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology–International Society of Geriatric Oncology Position Article

    Hans Wildiers;Murielle Mauer;Athanasios Pallis;Arti Hurria

  • A pilot study of the vulnerable elders survey‐13 compared with the comprehensive geriatric assessment for identifying disability in older patients with prostate cancer who receive androgen ablation

    Supriya G. Mohile;Kathryn Bylow;William Dale;James Dignam

  • Designing therapeutic clinical trials for older and frail adults with cancer: U13 conference recommendations.

    Arti Hurria;William Dale;Margaret Mooney;Julia H. Rowland

  • Cancer statistics for adults aged 85 years and older, 2019

    Carol E. DeSantis;Kimberly D. Miller;William Dale;Supriya G. Mohile

  • Older adult participation in cancer clinical trials: A systematic review of barriers and interventions.

    Mina S Sedrak;Rachel A Freedman;Harvey J Cohen;Hyman B Muss

  • A Practical Approach to Geriatric Assessment in Oncology

    Miriam B. Rodin;Supriya G. Mohile

  • Comorbidity in older adults with cancer

    Grant R. Williams;Amy Mackenzie;Allison Magnuson;Rebecca Olin

  • Association of a Cancer Diagnosis With Vulnerability and Frailty in Older Medicare Beneficiaries

    Supriya Gupta Mohile;Ying Xian;William Dale;Susan G. Fisher

  • Geriatric Assessment-Guided Care Processes for Older Adults: A Delphi Consensus of Geriatric Oncology Experts.

    Supriya Gupta Mohile;Carla Velarde;Arti Hurria;Allison Magnuson

Frequent Co-Authors

Arti Hurria
Arti Hurria City Of Hope National Medical Center
Gary R. Morrow
Gary R. Morrow University of Rochester Medical Center
Paul R. Duberstein
Paul R. Duberstein Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Ronald M. Epstein
Ronald M. Epstein University of Rochester Medical Center
Cary P. Gross
Cary P. Gross Yale University
Harvey J. Cohen
Harvey J. Cohen Duke University
Edward M. Messing
Edward M. Messing University of Rochester Medical Center
Walter M. Stadler
Walter M. Stadler University of Chicago
Michael Hoerger
Michael Hoerger Tulane University
Kevin Fiscella
Kevin Fiscella University of Rochester Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medical education in the USA opens doors to diverse online degree options and career paths, many of which provide flexibility and targeted expertise. As healthcare evolves, accessible online programs are becoming increasingly important for students who need to balance studies with other commitments.

For those interested in nutrition and wellness, a bachelor's in nutrition online delivers foundational knowledge in food science, public health, and dietary planning—a solid entry point for various health professions.

If you are looking to advance into healthcare management, it’s essential to choose programs recognized for quality. Many students seek out which online healthcare administration programs have cahme accreditation? CAHME-accredited MHA programs can boost your credentials and open leadership opportunities in hospitals and clinics.

For practicing nurses, flexible degree options like rn to bsn online without clinicals offer a convenient way to complete a BSN. These programs are designed to fit busy schedules without the need for on-site clinical work.

Ambitious nurses can advance their careers faster with short dnp programs that fast-track the journey from RN to Doctor of Nursing Practice. These accelerated formats help you gain advanced skills while managing your professional obligations.

Best Scientists Citing Supriya G. Mohile

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles