What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Internal medicine
- Gene
- Cancer
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Hyperalgesia, Pharmacology, Anesthesia, Nociception and Internal medicine.
His Hyperalgesia research includes elements of Protein kinase A, Prostaglandin E2, Nociceptor, Prostaglandin E and Protein kinase C.
His Pharmacology study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Inflammation, Agonist, Biochemistry, -Naloxone and Transient receptor potential channel.
His research integrates issues of Peripheral neuropathy and Dose–response relationship in his study of Anesthesia.
The concepts of his Nociception study are interwoven with issues in Tonicity, Reflex, TRPV4 and Central nervous system.
His Internal medicine study frequently draws parallels with other fields, such as Endocrinology.
His most cited work include:
- The capsaicin receptor: a heat-activated ion channel in the pain pathway (6958 citations)
- Hyperalgesic agents increase a tetrodotoxin-resistant Na+ current in nociceptors (596 citations)
- Systemic morphine suppresses noxious stimulus-evoked Fos protein-like immunoreactivity in the rat spinal cord. (493 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Jon D. Levine focuses on Internal medicine, Hyperalgesia, Endocrinology, Anesthesia and Nociceptor.
In general Internal medicine study, his work on Chemotherapy, Cancer and Breast cancer often relates to the realm of Context, thereby connecting several areas of interest.
His Hyperalgesia research incorporates themes from Prostaglandin E2, Pharmacology and Prostaglandin E.
His Endocrinology study which covers Protein kinase A that intersects with Second messenger system and Protein kinase C.
His Anesthesia study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Peripheral neuropathy and Placebo.
His Nociceptor research integrates issues from Sensitization, Stimulation, Neuroscience, Chronic pain and Priming.
He most often published in these fields:
- Internal medicine (41.07%)
- Hyperalgesia (34.32%)
- Endocrinology (30.33%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2016-2021)?
- Internal medicine (41.07%)
- Chemotherapy (7.11%)
- Cancer (5.20%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary areas of study are Internal medicine, Chemotherapy, Cancer, Hyperalgesia and Breast cancer.
Jon D. Levine has researched Internal medicine in several fields, including Endocrinology and Sleep disorder.
His Endocrinology research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Receptor, Glucocorticoid receptor, Estrogen receptor and Gene knockdown.
His work deals with themes such as DAMGO, Inflammation, TLR4, Prostaglandin E2 and Nociceptor, which intersect with Hyperalgesia.
His Nociceptor study is concerned with the larger field of Nociception.
His studies in Breast cancer integrate themes in fields like Peripheral neuropathy, Menopause, Surgery and Candidate gene.
Between 2016 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Chemotherapy-Induced Neuropathy in Cancer Survivors. (59 citations)
- Transition to chronic pain: opportunities for novel therapeutics. (51 citations)
- Hyperalgesic priming (type II) induced by repeated opioid exposure: maintenance mechanisms. (24 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Internal medicine
- Gene
- Cancer
Internal medicine, Hyperalgesia, Nociceptor, Context and Comorbidity are his primary areas of study.
The various areas that Jon D. Levine examines in his Internal medicine study include Peripheral neuropathy and Physical therapy.
His Hyperalgesia study deals with the bigger picture of Nociception.
His Nociception study combines topics in areas such as Signal transduction and Neuroscience.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Anesthesia and Endocrinology in addition to Nociceptor.
Within one scientific family, Jon D. Levine focuses on topics pertaining to Skeletal muscle under Anesthesia, and may sometimes address concerns connected to Receptor.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
