World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
33
Citations
4577
World Ranking
7848
National Ranking
2623

Ken M. Fritz publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ken M. Fritz sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 62 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Ken M. Fritz D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ken M. Fritz sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ken M. Fritz is affiliated with the Environmental Protection Agency in the United States. Their research contributions primarily focus on environmental science, with a total of 71 publications in this field. Within environmental science, they have covered several subfields including ecology, water science and technology, nature and landscape conservation, environmental engineering, and environmental chemistry.

Their main research topics include hydrology and sediment transport processes, hydrology and watershed management studies, fish ecology and management studies, freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology, soil and water nutrient dynamics, flood risk assessment and management, as well as soil erosion and sediment transport.

Ken M. Fritz has contributed to several recent scientific papers, including:

  • Assessing placement bias of the global river gauge network (2022), published in Nature Sustainability
  • Zero or not? Causes and consequences of zero-flow stream gage readings (2020), published in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water
  • What's in a Name? Patterns, Trends, and Suggestions for Defining Non-Perennial Rivers and Streams (2020), published in Water
  • River ecosystem conceptual models and non-perennial rivers: A critical review (2020), published in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water
  • A global perspective on the functional responses of stream communities to flow intermittence (2021), published in Ecography

Frequent coauthors in Ken M. Fritz's publications include:

  • Thibault Datry (8 joint publications)
  • Daniel C. Allen (5 joint publications)
  • Walter K. Dodds (5 joint publications)
  • Stephanie K. Kampf (5 joint publications)
  • Sarah E. Godsey (4 joint publications)

Some of the venues where Ken M. Fritz most frequently publishes are:

  • Water (4 publications)
  • Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water (2 publications)
  • Nature Reviews Earth & Environment (2 publications)
  • Freshwater Science (2 publications)
  • Journal of Hydrology (2 publications)

Best Publications

  • Life on the Edge: The Ecology of Great Plains Prairie Streams

    Walter K. Dodds;Keith Gido;Matt R. Whiles;Ken M. Fritz

  • THE DARK SIDE OF SUBSIDIES: ADULT STREAM INSECTS EXPORT ORGANIC CONTAMINANTS TO RIPARIAN PREDATORS

    David M. Walters;Ken M. Fritz;Ryan R. Otter

  • Broad-scale patterns of invertebrate richness and community composition in temporary rivers: effects of flow intermittence

    T. Datry;S.T. Larned;K.M. Fritz;M.T. Bogan

  • Ecological research and management of intermittent rivers: An historical review and future directions

    Catherine Leigh;Andrew J. Boulton;Jennifer L. Courtwright;Ken Fritz

  • Resistance and resilience of macroinvertebrate assemblages to drying and flood in a tallgrass prairie stream system

    Ken M. Fritz;Ken M. Fritz;Walter K. Dodds

  • Flow intermittence and ecosystem services in rivers of the Anthropocene

    Thibault Datry;Andrew J. Boulton;Núria Bonada;Ken Fritz

  • Understanding controls on flow permanence in intermittent rivers to aid ecological research: integrating meteorology, geology and land cover

    Katie H. Costigan;Katie H. Costigan;Kristin L. Jaeger;Charles W. Goss;Ken M. Fritz

  • The relationship of floods, drying, flow and light to primary production and producer biomass in a prairie stream

    Walter K. Dodds;Ruth E. Hutson;Angela C. Eichem;Michelle A. Evans

  • Urbanization affects the extent and hydrologic permanence of headwater streams in a midwestern US metropolitan area

    Allison H. Roy;Angel L. Dybas;Ken M. Fritz;Hannah R. Lubbers

  • Spider-mediated flux of PCBs from contaminated sediments to terrestrial ecosystems and potential risks to arachnivorous birds.

    David M Walters;Marc A Mills;Ken M Fritz;David F Raikow

  • Structural and functional characteristics of natural and constructed channels draining a reclaimed mountaintop removal and valley fill coal mine

    Ken M. Fritz;Stephanie Fulton;Brent R. Johnson;Chris D. Barton

  • Zero or not? Causes and consequences of zero-flow stream gage readings.

    Margaret A. Zimmer;Kendra E. Kaiser;Joanna R. Blaszczak;Samuel C. Zipper

  • A comparison of the trophic ecology of the crayfishes (Orconectes nais (Faxon) and Orconectes neglectus (Faxon)) and the central stoneroller minnow (Campostoma anomalum (Rafinesque)): omnivory in a tallgrass prairie stream

    Michelle Evans-White;Walter K. Dodds;Lawrence J. Gray;Ken M. Fritz

  • Challenges, developments and perspectives in intermittent river ecology

    Thibault Datry;Ken Fritz;Catherine Leigh

  • Physical indicators of hydrologic permanence in forested headwater streams

    Ken M. Fritz;Brent R. Johnson;David M. Walters

  • Comparing trophic position of stream fishes using stable isotope and gut contents analyses

    S. M. Rybczynski;D. M. Walters;K. M. Fritz;B. R. Johnson

  • River ecosystem conceptual models and non‐perennial rivers: A critical review

    Daniel C. Allen;Thibault Datry;Kate S. Boersma;Michael T. Bogan

  • Harshness: characterisation of intermittent stream habitat over space and time

    Ken M. Fritz;Ken M. Fritz;Walter K. Dodds

  • PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL CONNECTIVITY OF STREAMS AND RIPARIAN WETLANDS TO DOWNSTREAM WATERS: A SYNTHESIS

    Ken M. Fritz;Kate A. Schofield;Laurie C. Alexander;Michael G. McManus

  • BIOTA CONNECT AQUATIC HABITATS THROUGHOUT FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEM MOSAICS.

    Kate A. Schofield;Laurie C. Alexander;Caroline E. Ridley;Melanie K. Vanderhoof

  • Influence of Trophic Position and Spatial Location on Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) Bioaccumulation in a Stream Food Web

    David M. Walters;Ken M. Fritz;Ken M. Fritz;Brent R. Johnson;Brent R. Johnson;James M. Lazorchak;James M. Lazorchak

  • The distance that contaminated aquatic subsidies extend into lake riparian zones.

    David F. Raikow;David M. Walters;Ken M. Fritz;Marc A. Mills

Frequent Co-Authors

Walter K. Dodds
Walter K. Dodds Kansas State University
Thibault Datry
Thibault Datry Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Stephanie K. Kampf
Stephanie K. Kampf Colorado State University
Julian D. Olden
Julian D. Olden University of Washington
Scott G. Leibowitz
Scott G. Leibowitz Environmental Protection Agency
Adam S. Ward
Adam S. Ward Oregon State University
Paul M. Mayer
Paul M. Mayer Environmental Protection Agency
Charles R. Lane
Charles R. Lane Environmental Protection Agency
Heather E. Golden
Heather E. Golden Environmental Protection Agency
Sujay S. Kaushal
Sujay S. Kaushal University of Maryland, College Park

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution often leads students to consider related fields and interdisciplinary career paths. Online education options have made it easier than ever to branch out or accelerate your journey, particularly within healthcare and nursing professions.

For those interested in a biology-related healthcare role, there are accelerated nursing programs for non nurses online which allow you to efficiently transition into nursing, building on your science background. If you already hold a nursing license, fast-track options exist, such as the 6 month rn to bsn program, letting you earn your BSN swiftly and open doors to advanced practice careers.

Advancing further, you might wonder how many years to become a nurse practitioner. Shortened pathways are available that allow qualified individuals to attain their goals in less time. As career prospects grow within specialty fields, reviewing role-specific data is essential. For example, understanding regional demand and earning potential, like the pmhnp salary by state, helps you make informed decisions about your future.

Best Scientists Citing Ken M. Fritz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles