World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
41
Citations
6075
World Ranking
7762
National Ranking
2764

Scott G. Leibowitz publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott G. Leibowitz sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 95 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Scott G. Leibowitz D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott G. Leibowitz sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Scott G. Leibowitz is affiliated with the Environmental Protection Agency in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of environmental science, with a focus on watershed and water quality research. Their work spans several key areas including hydrology, ecosystem fire effects, nutrient dynamics, and environmental chemistry.

The scientist's research addresses critical topics such as hydrology and watershed management studies, fire effects on ecosystems, flood risk assessment and management, soil and water nutrient dynamics, landslides and related hazards, fish ecology and management studies, and hydrology and sediment transport processes.

Frequent coauthors in their publications include Ryan A. Hill, Marc H. Weber, Jana E. Compton, Mussie T. Beyene, and Michael J. Pennino. These collaborations reflect a broad engagement with colleagues working in environmental and water resource research.

Leibowitz has published notably in venues such as The Science of The Total Environment, JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, Water Resources Research, Ecosystems, and Nature Water. The Science of The Total Environment accounts for the highest number of their publications.

  • National hydrologic connectivity classification links wetlands with stream water quality, 2023, Nature Water
  • Wildfire Induces Changes in Receiving Waters: A Review With Considerations for Water Quality Management, 2022, Water Resources Research
  • Vulnerable Waters are Essential to Watershed Resilience, 2022, Ecosystems
  • Wildfires can increase regulated nitrate, arsenic, and disinfection byproduct violations and concentrations in public drinking water supplies, 2021, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Patterns and predictions of drinking water nitrate violations across the conterminous United States, 2020, The Science of The Total Environment

Their primary field of study is environmental science, with a significant focus on global and planetary change, water science and technology, ecology, environmental chemistry, and management, monitoring, policy, and law within the discipline.

Best Publications

  • Do geographically isolated wetlands influence landscape functions

    Matthew J. Cohen;Irena F. Creed;Laurie C. Alexander;Nandita Basu

  • ISOLATED WETLANDS AND THEIR FUNCTIONS: AN ECOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE

    Scott G. Leibowitz

  • The Stream‐Catchment (StreamCat) Dataset: A Database of Watershed Metrics for the Conterminous United States

    Ryan A. Hill;Marc H. Weber;Scott G. Leibowitz;Anthony R. Olsen

  • Assessing the accuracy and stability of variable selection methods for random forest modeling in ecology

    Eric W Fox;Ryan A Hill;Scott G Leibowitz;Anthony R Olsen

  • TEMPORAL CONNECTIVITY IN A PRAIRIE POTHOLE COMPLEX

    Scott G. Leibowitz;Kevin C. Vining

  • Trends in Drinking Water Nitrate Violations Across the United States

    Michael J. Pennino;Jana E. Compton;Scott G. Leibowitz

  • Connectivity of Streams and Wetlands to Downstream Waters: An Integrated Systems Framework

    Scott G. Leibowitz;Parker J. Wigington;Kate A. Schofield;Laurie C. Alexander

  • Enhancing protection for vulnerable waters

    Irena F. Creed;Irena F. Creed;Charles R. Lane;Jacqueline N. Serran;Laurie C. Alexander

  • Wildfire Induces Changes in Receiving Waters: A Review With Considerations for Water Quality Management

    Unknown

  • Juvenile Coho Salmon Growth and Survival across Stream Network Seasonal Habitats

    Joseph L. Ebersole;Parker J. Wigington;Joan P. Baker;Michael A. Cairns

  • Geographically isolated wetlands are part of the hydrological landscape

    Mark Rains;S. G. Leibowitz;M. J. Cohen;I. F. Creed

  • Integrated coastal reserve planning: making the land–sea connection

    David M. Stoms;Frank W. Davis;Sandy J. Andelman;Mark H. Carr

  • Rethinking the longitudinal stream temperature paradigm: region‐wide comparison of thermal infrared imagery reveals unexpected complexity of river temperatures

    Aimee H. Fullerton;Aimee H. Fullerton;Christian E. Torgersen;Joshua J. Lawler;Russell N. Faux

  • Hydrological, Physical, and Chemical Functions and Connectivity of Non‐Floodplain Wetlands to Downstream Waters: A Review

    Charles R. Lane;Scott G. Leibowitz;Bradley C. Autrey;Stephen D. LeDuc

  • Non-navigable streams and adjacent wetlands: addressing science needs following the Supreme Court's Rapanos decision

    Scott G. Leibowitz;Parker J. Wigington Jr.;Mark Cable Rains;Donna M. Downing

  • Coho salmon dependence on intermittent streams

    PJ Wigington;JL Ebersole;ME Colvin;SG Leibowitz

  • A Watershed Integrity Definition and Assessment Approach to Support Strategic Management of Watersheds

    J E Flotemersch;S G Leibowitz;R A Hill;J L Stoddard

  • Comparing the Extent and Permanence of Headwater Streams From Two Field Surveys to Values From Hydrographic Databases and Maps

    Ken M. Fritz;Elisabeth Hagenbuch;Ellen D'Amico;Molly Reif

  • Intermittent Surface Water Connectivity: Fill and Spill Vs. Fill and Merge Dynamics

    Scott G. Leibowitz;David M. Mushet;Wesley E. Newton

  • A synoptic assessment for prioritizing wetland restoration efforts to optimize flood attenuation.

    Lynne S. McAllister;Barbara E. Peniston;Scott G. Leibowitz;Brooke Abbruzzese

  • ENVIRONMENTAL AUDITING: A Synoptic Approach for Assessing Cumulative Impacts to Wetlands

    Brooke Abbruzzese;Scott G. Leibowitz

Frequent Co-Authors

Jana E. Compton
Jana E. Compton Environmental Protection Agency
Charles R. Lane
Charles R. Lane Environmental Protection Agency
Heather E. Golden
Heather E. Golden Environmental Protection Agency
Irena F. Creed
Irena F. Creed University of Toronto
Ken M. Fritz
Ken M. Fritz Environmental Protection Agency
Matthew J. Cohen
Matthew J. Cohen University of Florida
John L. Stoddard
John L. Stoddard Environmental Protection Agency
James W. Jawitz
James W. Jawitz University of Florida
James S. Famiglietti
James S. Famiglietti University of Saskatchewan
Joshua J. Lawler
Joshua J. Lawler University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to various related online degrees that can further enhance your expertise and career prospects. For professionals interested in leadership roles within government or nonprofit sectors, exploring a 1 year mpa online program offers a fast-tracked path to public administration skills. This complements the scientific knowledge gained in environmental studies by focusing on policy and management.

If you're drawn to the social aspects of environmental issues, pursuing the best online sociology bachelor degree can provide insights into human behaviors and societal structures that impact environmental outcomes. This interdisciplinary approach prepares graduates for roles in community outreach, advocacy, and sustainability initiatives.

For educators aiming to influence environmental science teaching or policy, online doctoral options such as online ed d programs without dissertation offer flexibility and reduced barriers to advanced research skills. Complementing this, eds to edd bridge programs online provide a streamlined pathway from a master's level to a doctoral degree, enabling career advancement in academic or administrative roles.

These online degree options demonstrate the diverse routes Environmental Sciences students can take, blending science, policy, sociology, and education to address global environmental challenges effectively.

Best Scientists Citing Scott G. Leibowitz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles