World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
45
Citations
15220
World Ranking
6232
National Ranking
2246

John L. Stoddard publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John L. Stoddard sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 85 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

John L. Stoddard D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John L. Stoddard sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

John L. Stoddard is affiliated with the Environmental Protection Agency in the United States. Their research chiefly spans the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a focus on subfields such as Environmental Chemistry, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Oceanography, and Geochemistry and Petrology.

The scientist's work addresses several main topics related to aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. These include Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics, Marine and Coastal Ecosystems, Freshwater Macroinvertebrate Diversity and Ecology, Fish Ecology and Management Studies, Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior, Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry, and Diatoms and Algae Research.

John L. Stoddard has contributed to scientific literature through several recent papers, including:

  • Cleaner air reveals growing influence of climate on dissolved organic carbon trends in northern headwaters (2021), Environmental Research Letters
  • Long-term rise in riverine dissolved organic carbon concentration is predicted by electrolyte solubility theory (2023), Science Advances
  • Context is Everything: Interacting Inputs and Landscape Characteristics Control Stream Nitrogen (2021), Environmental Science & Technology
  • Genus-level, trait-based multimetric diatom indices for assessing the ecological condition of rivers and streams across the conterminous United States (2022), Ecological Indicators
  • Comparing Drivers of Spatial Variability in U.S. Lake and Stream Phosphorus Concentrations (2023), Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences

The frequent venues for publication include:

  • Environmental Research Letters
  • Science Advances
  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • Ecological Indicators
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences

Collaboration is evident through frequent coauthors, including:

  • Alan T. Herlihy (7 collaborations)
  • Ryan A. Hill (6 collaborations)
  • Robert D. Sabo (5 collaborations)
  • Jana E. Compton (4 collaborations)
  • Jakub Hruška (3 collaborations)

Best Publications

  • Dissolved organic carbon trends resulting from changes in atmospheric deposition chemistry.

    Donald T. Monteith;John L. Stoddard;Christopher D. Evans;Heleen A. de Wit

  • Acidic Deposition in the Northeastern United States: Sources and Inputs, Ecosystem Effects, and Management Strategies

    Charles T. Driscoll;Gregory B. Lawrence;Arthur J. Bulger;Thomas J. Butler

  • Setting expectations for the ecological condition of streams: the concept of reference condition

    John L. Stoddard;David P. Larsen;Charles P. Hawkins;Richard K. Johnson

  • Regional trends in aquatic recovery from acidification in North America and Europe

    J. L. Stoddard;D. S. Jeffries;A. Lükewille;T. A. Clair

  • Is Nitrogen Deposition Altering the Nitrogen Status of Northeastern Forests

    John D. Aber;Christine L. Goodale;Scott V. Ollinger;Marie-Louise Smith

  • Long-term changes in watershed retention of nitrogen, its causes and aquatic consequences

    J. L. Stoddard

  • Effects of nitrogen deposition and empirical nitrogen critical loads for ecoregions of the United States

    Linda H. Pardo;Mike E. Fenn;Christine L. Goodale;Linda. H. Geiser

  • A process for creating multimetric indices for large-scale aquatic surveys

    John L. Stoddard;Alan T. Herlihy;David V. Peck;Robert M. Hughes

  • Regional scale evidence for improvements in surface water chemistry 1990–2001

    B.L. Skjelkvåle;J.L. Stoddard;D.S. Jeffries;K. Tørseth

  • Project risk management: lessons learned from software development environment

    Y.H. Kwak;J. Stoddard

  • The Relationship between Stream Chemistry and Watershed Land Cover Data in the Mid-Atlantic Region, U.S.

    Alan T. Herlihy;John L. Stoddard;Colleen Burch Johnson

  • Development and evaluation of a Macroinvertebrate Biotic Integrity Index (MBII) for regionally assessing Mid-Atlantic Highlands Streams.

    Donald J. Klemm;Karen A. Blocksom;Florence A. Fulk;Alan T. Herlihy

  • The Role of Nitrate in the Acidification of Streams in the Catskill Mountains of New York

    Peter S. Murdoch;John L. Stoddard

  • Development of an Index of Biotic Integrity for the Mid-Atlantic Highlands Region

    Frank H. McCormick;Robert M. Hughes;Philip R. Kaufmann;David V. Peck

  • Trends in Surface Water Chemistry in Acidified Areas in Europe and North America from 1990 to 2008

    Øyvind Aaberg Garmo;Brit Lisa Skjelkvåle;Heleen de Wit;Luca Colombo

  • Continental-Scale Increase in Lake and Stream Phosphorus: Are Oligotrophic Systems Disappearing in the United States?

    John L. Stoddard;John Van Sickle;Alan T. Herlihy;Janice Brahney

  • Striving for consistency in a national assessment: the challenges of applying a reference-condition approach at a continental scale

    Alan T. Herlihy;Steven G. Paulsen;John Van Sickle;John L. Stoddard

  • Condition of stream ecosystems in the US: an overview of the first national assessment

    Steven G. Paulsen;Alice Mayio;David V. Peck;John L. Stoddard

  • A Structured Approach for Developing Indices of Biotic Integrity: Three Examples from Streams and Rivers in the Western USA

    Thomas R. Whittier;Robert M. Hughes;John L. Stoddard;Gregg A. Lomnicky

  • Long-term changes in watershed retention of nitrogen

    Unknown

  • Is Nitrogen Deposition Altering the Nitrogen Status of Northeastern Forests

    J. D. Aber;C. L. Goodale;S. V. Ollinger;M. Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles T. Driscoll
Charles T. Driscoll Syracuse University
Alan T. Herlihy
Alan T. Herlihy Oregon State University
Don Monteith
Don Monteith Lancaster University
Kathleen C. Weathers
Kathleen C. Weathers Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies
Heleen A. de Wit
Heleen A. de Wit Norwegian Institute for Water Research
Jill S. Baron
Jill S. Baron United States Geological Survey
Christine L. Goodale
Christine L. Goodale Cornell University
Jeffrey S. Kahl
Jeffrey S. Kahl Thomas College
Robert M. Hughes
Robert M. Hughes Oregon State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens diverse career pathways that often intersect with other disciplines. For those interested in data analysis and spatial technologies, a geographic information systems degree offers essential skills in mapping and environmental data management, supporting careers in conservation and urban planning.

Leadership roles within environmental policy and public sector organizations may benefit from advanced training. A best online masters in public administration can equip students with management expertise to drive sustainable initiatives and influence policy development.

Understanding social dynamics is crucial in environmental work, particularly in community engagement and behavioral studies. Pursuing an accredited online bachelors in sociology complements environmental knowledge by providing insight into societal impacts and human-environment interactions.

For professionals aiming to further research or academic careers without the extensive commitment of a dissertation, doctoral programs online no dissertation offer flexible pathways to advance expertise in environmental education and policy implementation.

Best Scientists Citing John L. Stoddard

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles