World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
54
Citations
8285
World Ranking
3288
National Ranking
965

Clifton M. Schor publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clifton M. Schor sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 207 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Clifton M. Schor D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clifton M. Schor sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Clifton M. Schor is affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of medicine and neuroscience, with notable contributions to cognitive neuroscience, epidemiology, ophthalmology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, and media technology.

The main areas of study in their work focus on ophthalmology and visual impairment studies, visual perception and processing mechanisms, glaucoma and retinal disorders, intraocular surgery and lenses, corneal surgery and disorders, advanced optical imaging technologies, as well as virtual reality applications and their impacts.

Frequent publication venues for Schor include:

  • Journal of Vision
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Scientific Reports
  • Vision Research

Their recent scholarly papers include:

  • "A computational analysis of retinal image quality in eyes with keratoconus" (2020), Scientific Reports
  • "Seeing the future: Predictive control in neural models of ocular accommodation" (2022), Journal of Vision
  • "Success rates, near-response patterns, and learning trends with free-fusion stereograms" (2023), Vision Research
  • "Seeing the future: predictive control in neural models of ocular accommodation" (2021), bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • "Understanding accommodative control in the clinic: modeling latency and amplitude for uncorrected refractive error, presbyopia and cycloplegia" (2023), bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Schor has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Jenny C. A. Read
  • Shrikant R. Bharadwaj
  • Christos Kaspiris-Rousellis
  • Toby S. Wood
  • Bing Wu

Their research covers multiple interconnected topics within vision science and ophthalmology, emphasizing both fundamental and applied aspects of visual function and disorders. This includes work on retinal image quality, neural models of ocular accommodation, stereogram perception, and clinical modeling related to refractive errors and presbyopia.

Best Publications

  • Vergence eye movements : basic and clinical aspects

    Clifton M. Schor;Kenneth J. Ciuffreda

  • Disparity range for local stereopsis as a function of luminance spatial frequency

    Clifton M. Schor;Ivan Wood

  • Binocular sensory fusion is limited by spatial resolution

    Clifton Schor;Ivan Wood;Jane Ogawa

  • The relationship between fusional vergence eye movements and fixation disparity.

    Clifton M. Schor

  • A dynamic model of cross-coupling between accommodation and convergence: simulations of step and frequency responses.

    Clifton M. Schor

  • Dynamic interactions between accommodation and convergence are velocity sensitive.

    Clifton M. Schor;John C. Kotulak

  • The influence of rapid prism adaptation upon fixation disparity.

    Clifton M. Schor

  • Ocular dominance and the interocular suppression of blur in monovision.

    Clifton Schor;Lori Landsman;Paul Erickson

  • Interocular correlation, luminance contrast and cyclopean processing

    Lawrence K. Cormack;Scott B. Stevenson;Clifton M. Schor

  • Spatio-temporal properties of Panum's fusional area.

    Clifton M. Schor;Clifton M. Schor;Christopher W. Tyler;Christopher W. Tyler

  • Failure of rivalry at low contrast: Evidence of a suprathreshold binocular summation process

    Lei Liu;Christopher W. Tyler;Clifton M. Schor

  • Spatial tuning of static and dynamic local stereopsis

    Clifton M. Schor;Ivan C. Wood;Jane Ogawa

  • Depth-increment detection function for individual spatial channels.

    David R. Badcock;Clifton M. Schor

  • Interocular differences in contrast and spatial frequency: effects on stereopsis and fusion.

    Clifton Schor;Thomas Heckmann

  • The influence of field size upon the spatial frequency response of optokinetic nystagmus.

    Clifton Schor;Venki Narayan

  • The influence of interactions between accommodation and convergence on the lag of accommodation.

    Clifton Schor

  • Negative feedback control model of proximal convergence and accommodation.

    Clifton M. Schor;Jack Alexander;Lawrence Cormack;Scott Stevenson

  • Fixation of disparity: a steady state error of disparity-induced vergence.

    Clifton Schor

  • Changing size (looming) as a stimulus to accommodation and vergence.

    Leon N. McLin;Clifton M. Schor;Philip B. Kruger

  • Temporal variations in accommodation during steady-state conditions

    John C. Kotulak;Clifton M. Schor

  • Asymmetries of optokinetic nystagmus in amblyopia: the effect of selected retinal stimulation

    Carol A. Westall;Clifton M. Schor

Frequent Co-Authors

Lawrence K. Cormack
Lawrence K. Cormack The University of Texas at Austin
Christopher W. Tyler
Christopher W. Tyler Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute
Dennis M. Levi
Dennis M. Levi University of California, Berkeley
Suzanne P. McKee
Suzanne P. McKee Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute
Bruce Bridgeman
Bruce Bridgeman University of California, Santa Cruz
Raymond van Ee
Raymond van Ee Radboud University
J. Anthony Movshon
J. Anthony Movshon New York University
Anthony M. Norcia
Anthony M. Norcia Stanford University
Kenneth J. Ciuffreda
Kenneth J. Ciuffreda State University of New York
Jitendra Malik
Jitendra Malik University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Engineering and Technology in the USA opens doors to a variety of career pathways that increasingly value interdisciplinary skills. Today, online learning makes it easier than ever to boost your resume with additional qualifications — often at a lower cost and greater flexibility.

Engineers interested in team leadership or workforce management may benefit from a 1 year online master's in human resources. This fast-track degree can help technical professionals move quickly into management roles.

Effective communication is crucial for modern engineers. Consider enhancing your skill set with the cheapest online communications degree. This option helps develop the ability to explain complex technical concepts and collaborate across teams.

If your interests include innovation or starting your own business, explore online mba entrepreneurship programs. These programs focus on the business acumen and creative thinking needed to launch technical startups or lead change within established companies.

For engineers or technologists seeking broader business knowledge, the cheapest online mba no gmat options make it easier to gain a reputable business degree without the extra hurdle of standardized testing.

Best Scientists Citing Clifton M. Schor

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles