World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
63
Citations
12566
World Ranking
3419
National Ranking
1583

Anthony M. Norcia publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony M. Norcia sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 390 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Anthony M. Norcia D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony M. Norcia sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anthony M. Norcia is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States and has an extensive publication record primarily in the field of Neuroscience, with a focus on Cognitive Neuroscience. Their research spans multiple subfields, including Developmental and Educational Psychology, Biomedical Engineering, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The scientist's work covers a range of key topics in neuroscience and psychology. These include:

  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Face Recognition and Perception
  • Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills

Anthony M. Norcia has contributed to several frequent publication venues, reflecting the focus and impact of their research. These venues include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Vision
  • Scientific Reports
  • NeuroImage
  • OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)

The scientist has collaborated extensively with various researchers. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Blair Kaneshiro
  • Bruce D. McCandliss
  • Fang Wang
  • Quynh Trang H. Nguyen
  • Milena Kaestner

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Anthony M. Norcia demonstrate their research focus and interests. These include:

  • "Memory failure predicted by attention lapsing and media multitasking," 2020, Nature
  • "Discovery and clinical translation of novel glaucoma biomarkers," 2020, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research
  • "Natural music evokes correlated EEG responses reflecting temporal structure and beat," 2020, NeuroImage
  • "Dynamics of Contrast Decrement and Increment Responses in Human Visual Cortex," 2020, Translational Vision Science & Technology
  • "Mouse visual cortex as a limited resource system that self-learns an ecologically-general representation," 2023, PLoS Computational Biology

Best Publications

  • The steady-state visual evoked potential in vision research: A review.

    Anthony Norcia;L. Gregory Appelbaum;Justin Michael Ales;Benoit Cottereau;Benoit Cottereau

  • Collinear stimuli regulate visual responses depending on cell's contrast threshold

    Uri Polat;Keiko Mizobe;Mark W. Pettet;Takuji Kasamatsu

  • Spatial frequency sweep VEP: visual acuity during the first year of life.

    Anthony M. Norcia;Christopher W. Tyler

  • Event-related brain potentials to human faces in infants.

    Eric Courchesne;Leo Ganz;Anthony M. Norcia

  • Development of contrast sensitivity in the human infant.

    Anthony M. Norcia;Christopher W. Tyler;Russell D. Hamer

  • An objective index of individual face discrimination in the right occipito-temporal cortex by means of fast periodic oddball stimulation

    Joan Liu-Shuang;Anthony M. Norcia;Bruno Rossion

  • A Representational Similarity Analysis of the Dynamics of Object Processing Using Single-Trial EEG Classification.

    Blair Kaneshiro;Marcos Perreau Guimaraes;Hyung-Suk Kim;Anthony M. Norcia

  • A method for investigating binocular rivalry in real-time with the steady-state VEP

    Rick J. Brown;Anthony M. Norcia

  • Neurophysiological Evidence for Contrast Dependent Long-range Facilitation and Suppression in the Human Visual Cortex

    Uri Polat;Anthony M Norcia

  • Measurement of spatial contrast sensitivity with the swept contrast VEP

    Anthony M. Norcia;Christopher W. Tyler;Russell D. Hamer;Wolfgang Wesemann

  • Abnormal long-range spatial interactions in amblyopia.

    Uri Polat;Dov Sagi;Anthony M Norcia

  • Cue-Invariant Networks for Figure and Background Processing in Human Visual Cortex

    L. G. Appelbaum;A. R. Wade;V. Y. Vildavski;M. W. Pettet

  • A new test of contour integration deficits in patients with a history of disrupted binocular experience during visual development

    Ilona Kovács;Uri Polat;Philippa M Pennefather;Arvind Chandna

  • An adaptive filter for steady-state evoked responses

    Yu Tang;Anthony M. Norcia

  • Anomalous motion VEPs in infants and in infantile esotropia.

    A M Norcia;H Garcia;R Humphry;A Holmes

  • Memory failure predicted by attention lapsing and media multitasking.

    Kevin P. Madore;Anna M. Khazenzon;Cameron W. Backes;Jiefeng Jiang

  • Development of sensitivity to information for impending collision

    Albert Yonas;A. Gordon Bechtold;Daniel Frankel;F. Robert Gordon

  • Late Maturation of Visual Hyperacuity

    Ann M. Skoczenski;Anthony M. Norcia

  • V1 is not uniquely identified by polarity reversals of responses to upper and lower visual field stimuli.

    Justin M. Ales;Jacob L. Yates;Anthony M. Norcia

  • The 6 Hz fundamental stimulation frequency rate for individual face discrimination in the right occipito-temporal cortex.

    Esther Alonso-Prieto;Goedele Van Belle;Joan Liu-Shuang;Anthony M. Norcia

  • Digital Filtering and Robust Regression Techniques for Estimating Sensory Thresholds from the Evoked Potential

    Anthony M. Norcia;Maureen Clarke;Christopher W. Tyler

  • Development of VEP Vernier Acuity and Grating Acuity in Human Infants

    Ann M. Skoczenski;Anthony M. Norcia

Frequent Co-Authors

Suzanne P. McKee
Suzanne P. McKee Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute
Bruno Rossion
Bruno Rossion University of Lorraine
Christopher W. Tyler
Christopher W. Tyler Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute
Gaia Scerif
Gaia Scerif University of Oxford
Yanxi Liu
Yanxi Liu Pennsylvania State University
Jeffrey L. Goldberg
Jeffrey L. Goldberg Stanford University
Marom Bikson
Marom Bikson City College of New York
Louis Maillard
Louis Maillard University of Lorraine
Bruce D. McCandliss
Bruce D. McCandliss Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in broadening your career options after studying neuroscience? Many students consider pursuing most lucrative college majors to boost potential salary and job security. Neuroscience prepares you for high-demand fields like healthcare, research, and biomedical technology, all of which pay well for specialized skills.

Online education can be a flexible and affordable way to gain further credentials. If cost is a concern, look into online colleges that take financial aid to offset tuition and make advanced learning accessible. Some online programs offer streamlined curricula, qualifying as easy university paths that suit different learning needs or allow faster completion.

For those seeking rapid skill development, enrolling in certificates online is a smart move. Specialized certificates in neuroscience, data science, or healthcare can help you stand out in the job market and advance your career quickly.

Best Scientists Citing Anthony M. Norcia

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles