World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
64
Citations
11829
World Ranking
3324
National Ranking
1538

Kenneth J. Ciuffreda publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth J. Ciuffreda sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 364 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Kenneth J. Ciuffreda D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth J. Ciuffreda sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kenneth J. Ciuffreda is affiliated with the State University of New York in the United States. Their research focus spans multiple disciplines within medicine and neuroscience, particularly concentrating on ophthalmology, neurology, and epidemiology. Ciuffreda's work addresses visual impairment studies and traumatic brain injury research, incorporating aspects of cognitive neuroscience and radiology as well.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Medicine
  • Neuroscience

Within these fields, their subfields of research involve:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Neurology
  • Epidemiology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

Main topics covered in Ciuffreda's research consist of:

  • Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Traumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Corneal Surgery and Disorders
  • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Visual Perception and Processing Mechanisms

Recent notable publications include:

  • Utility of Pupillary Light Reflex Metrics as a Physiologic Biomarker for Adolescent Sport-Related Concussion, 2020, JAMA Ophthalmology
  • The Association Between Nearwork-Induced Transient Myopia and Progression of Refractive Error: A 3-Year Cohort Report From Beijing Myopia Progression Study, 2020, Journal of Optometry
  • Historical, Diagnostic, and Chromatic Treatment in Visual Snow Syndrome: A Retrospective Analysis, 2023, Optometry and Vision Science
  • The Effect of Eye Exercises of Acupoints on Myopia Progression: A 3-Year Cohort Report From the Beijing Myopia Progression Study, 2020, Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
  • Visual Snow Syndrome: Evolving Neuro-Optometric Considerations in Concussion/Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, 2021, Concussion

Frequently publishing venues for Ciuffreda include:

  • Concussion
  • Optometry and Vision Science
  • Journal of Optometry
  • Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
  • JAMA Ophthalmology

Collaborations with other researchers form an important aspect of Ciuffreda's work. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Nabin Joshi
  • Christina L. Master
  • Kristy B. Arbogast
  • Barry Tannen
  • Daniella Rutner

Best Publications

  • Occurrence of oculomotor dysfunctions in acquired brain injury: a retrospective analysis.

    Kenneth J. Ciuffreda;Neera Kapoor;Daniella Rutner;Irwin B. Suchoff

  • Amblyopia: Basic and Clinical Aspects

    Kenneth J. Ciuffreda;Dennis M. Levi;Arkady Selenow

  • Vergence eye movements : basic and clinical aspects

    Clifton M. Schor;Kenneth J. Ciuffreda

  • Depth-of-focus of the human eye: theory and clinical implications.

    Bin Wang;Kenneth J. Ciuffreda

  • Vision Disturbances Following Traumatic Brain Injury.

    Neera Kapoor;Kenneth J. Ciuffreda

  • Dynamic aspects of accommodation: age and presbyopia.

    John A Mordi;Kenneth J Ciuffreda

  • Eye Movement Basics For The Clinician

    Kenneth J. Ciuffreda;Barry Tannen

  • Vision therapy for oculomotor dysfunctions in acquired brain injury: a retrospective analysis.

    Kenneth J. Ciuffreda;Daniella Rutner;Neera Kapoor;Irwin B. Suchoff

  • A Dual-Mode Dynamic Model of the Vergence Eye Movement System

    George K. Hung;John L. Semmlow;Kenneth J. Ciufferda

  • The scientific basis for and efficacy of optometric vision therapy in nonstrabismic accommodative and vergence disorders.

    Kenneth J. Ciuffreda

  • Quantitative assessment of disparity vergence components.

    J L Semmlow;G K Hung;K J Ciuffreda

  • Near work, outdoor activity, and their association with refractive error.

    Zhong Lin;Balamurali Vasudevan;Vishal Jhanji;Guang Yun Mao

  • Accommodation and apparent distance.

    S Kay Fisher;Kenneth J Ciuffreda

  • Proximal contribution to a linear static model of accommodation and vergence

    George K. Hung;Kenneth J. Ciuffreda;Mark Rosenfield

  • Vergence dysfunction in mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI): a review

    Preethi Thiagarajan;Kenneth J Ciuffreda;Diana P Ludlam

  • Nearwork-induced transient myopia: a critical review.

    Editha Ong;Kenneth J. Ciuffreda

  • Myopes show increased susceptibility to nearwork aftereffects

    K J Ciuffreda;D M Wallis

  • Oculomotor neurorehabilitation for reading in mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI): an integrative approach.

    Preethi Thiagarajan;Kenneth J. Ciuffreda;Jose E. Capo-Aponte;Diana P. Ludlam

  • Convergence and Divergence Exhibit Different Response Characteristics to Symmetric Stimuli

    George K. Hung;Huimin Zhu;Kenneth J. Ciuffreda

  • Depth-of-focus of the human eye in the near retinal periphery.

    Bin Wang;Kenneth J Ciuffreda

  • The frequency of occurrence, types, and characteristics of visual field defects in acquired brain injury: a retrospective analysis.

    Irwin B. Suchoff;Neera Kapoor;Kenneth J. Ciuffreda;Daniella Rutner

  • Accommodative stimulus/response function in human amblyopia

    K. J. Ciuffreda;S. C. Hokoda;G. K. Hung;J. L. Semmlow

  • Tonic accommodation: a review. I. Basic aspects.

    Mark Rosenfield;Kenneth J. Ciuffreda;George K. Hung;Bernard Gilmartin

Frequent Co-Authors

John L. Semmlow
John L. Semmlow Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Lawrence Stark
Lawrence Stark University of California, Berkeley
Robert V. Kenyon
Robert V. Kenyon University of Illinois at Chicago
Kristy B. Arbogast
Kristy B. Arbogast Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Jie Jin Wang
Jie Jin Wang University of Sydney
Dennis M. Levi
Dennis M. Levi University of California, Berkeley
A. Terry Bahill
A. Terry Bahill University of Arizona
Clifton M. Schor
Clifton M. Schor University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Neuroscience in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degrees and career pathways in related fields. Many students consider flexible options such as cheap online msw programs to prepare for roles in social work and behavioral health. These affordable choices can make earning a graduate degree more accessible.

Another pathway in behavioral sciences is the bcba degree for those interested in board-certified behavior analysis, a field that works closely with neuroscience principles. Some students seek accelerated msw programs to fast-track their entry into the workforce, benefiting those eager to apply their neuroscience background in social or therapeutic settings.

For those who are considering an undergraduate route, an accelerated psychology bachelor's degree online can lay a strong foundation for advanced study in neuroscience or related professions. Exploring these flexible, affordable, and accelerated online degree pathways can help you match your education with your desired career trajectory in the behavioral or mental health fields.

Best Scientists Citing Kenneth J. Ciuffreda

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles