World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
49
Citations
6853
World Ranking
6060
National Ranking
171

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
45
Citations
6255
World Ranking
3953
National Ranking
163

Raymond van Ee publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raymond van Ee sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 164 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Raymond van Ee D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raymond van Ee sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Raymond van Ee is a researcher affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands. Their work predominantly falls within the field of Neuroscience, with a specific focus on subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Human-Computer Interaction, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Sensory Systems, and Neurology.

The main topics covered in their research encompass Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts, Neural Dynamics and Brain Function, Visual Perception and Processing Mechanisms, Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction, Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies, Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery, and Musculoskeletal Pain and Rehabilitation.

Among recent publications authored or coauthored by van Ee are:

  • The Use of the Term Virtual Reality in Post-Stroke Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review and Commentary, 2021, Psychologica Belgica
  • Immersive Virtual Reality for Older Adults, 2021, ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing
  • An immersive virtual reality game to train spatial attention orientation after stroke: A feasibility study, 2020, Applied Neuropsychology Adult
  • Intracranial Recordings Reveal Unique Shape and Timing of Responses in Human Visual Cortex during Illusory Visual Events, 2020, Current Biology
  • Deriving a Cortisol-Related Stress Indicator From Wearable Skin Conductance Measurements: Quantitative Model & Experimental Validation, 2020, Frontiers in Computer Science

Van Ee frequently collaborates with several coauthors, including Hanne Huygelier, Céline R. Gillebert, Vero Vanden Abeele, Brenda Schraepen, and Fabienne Schillebeeckx. These coauthorships indicate ongoing collaborative research efforts in related areas.

Their research output is published across various scientific venues, notably Psychologica Belgica, ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing, Applied Neuropsychology Adult, Current Biology, and Frontiers in Computer Science.

Best Publications

  • Acute alerting effects of light: A systematic literature review.

    Jan L Souman;Angelica M Tinga;Susan F Te Pas;Raymond van Ee

  • Horizontal and vertical disparity, eye position, and stereoscopic slant perception

    Benjamin T. Backus;Martin S. Banks;Raymond van Ee;James A. Crowell

  • Acceptance of immersive head-mounted virtual reality in older adults.

    Hanne Huygelier;Brenda Schraepen;Raymond van Ee;Raymond van Ee;Raymond van Ee;Vero Vanden Abeele

  • The time course of binocular rivalry reveals a fundamental role of noise

    Jan W. Brascamp;Raymond van Ee;André J. Noest;Richard H. A. H. Jacobs

  • Percept-choice sequences driven by interrupted ambiguous stimuli: a low-level neural model.

    Unknown

  • Voluntary control and the dynamics of perceptual bi-stability

    Unknown

  • Multisensory congruency as a mechanism for attentional control over perceptual selection.

    Raymond van Ee;Jeroen Johan Adrien van Boxtel;Amanda L Parker;David Alais

  • Distributions of alternation rates in various forms of bistable perception.

    Jan W. Brascamp;Raymond van Ee;Wiebe R. Pestman;Albert V. van den Berg

  • Flash suppression and flash facilitation in binocular rivalry

    Jan W. Brascamp;Tomas H. J. Knapen;Ryota Kanai;Raymond van Ee

  • Stochastic variations in sensory awareness are driven by noisy neuronal adaptation: evidence from serial correlations in perceptual bistability

    Raymond van Ee

  • Dynamics of perceptual bi-stability for stereoscopic slant rivalry and a comparison with grating, house-face, and Necker cube rivalry

    Raymond van Ee

  • Continuous Flash Suppression: Stimulus Fractionation rather than Integration

    Pieter Moors;Guido Hesselmann;Johan Wagemans;Raymond van Ee;Raymond van Ee;Raymond van Ee

  • Multi-Timescale Perceptual History Resolves Visual Ambiguity

    Jan W. Brascamp;Tomas H. J. Knapen;Ryota Kanai;André J. Noest

  • The role of saccades in exerting voluntary control in perceptual and binocular rivalry

    Loes C.J. van Dam;Raymond van Ee

  • Retinal image shifts, but not eye movements per se, cause alternations in awareness during binocular rivalry

    Loes C J van Dam;Raymond van Ee

  • Adaptation to three-dimensional distortions in human vision.

    Wendy J. Adams;Martin S. Banks;Raymond van Ee

  • Early interactions between neuronal adaptation and voluntary control determine perceptual choices in bistable vision.

    Unknown

  • Retinotopic and non-retinotopic stimulus encoding in binocular rivalry and the involvement of feedback

    Jeroen Johan Adrien van Boxtel;David Alais;Raymond van Ee

  • Bayesian modeling of cue interaction: bistability in stereoscopic slant perception

    Raymond Van Ee;Wendy J. J. Adams;Pascal Mamassian

  • "Smooth operator": Music modulates the perceived creaminess, sweetness, and bitterness of chocolate.

    Felipe Reinoso Carvalho;Felipe Reinoso Carvalho;Qian Janice Wang;Raymond van Ee;Dominique Persoone

  • Visual Cortex Allows Prediction of Perceptual States during Ambiguous Structure-From-Motion

    Gijs Joost Brouwer;Raymond van Ee

  • Activation in Visual Cortex Correlates with the Awareness of Stereoscopic Depth

    Gijs Joost Brouwer;Raymond van Ee;Jens Schwarzbach

  • Attending to auditory signals slows visual alternations in binocular rivalry.

    David Alais;Jeroen Johan Adrien van Boxtel;Amanda L Parker;Raymond van Ee

  • The influence of soundscapes on the perception and evaluation of beers

    Felipe Reinoso Carvalho;Felipe Reinoso Carvalho;Qian (Janice) Wang;Raymond Van Ee;Raymond Van Ee;Raymond Van Ee;Charles Spence

Frequent Co-Authors

Ryota Kanai
Ryota Kanai University of Sussex
Charles Spence
Charles Spence University of Oxford
Randolph Blake
Randolph Blake Vanderbilt University
David Alais
David Alais University of Sydney
Denise T. D. de Ridder
Denise T. D. de Ridder Utrecht University
Frans A. J. Verstraten
Frans A. J. Verstraten University of Sydney
Carlos Velasco
Carlos Velasco BI Norwegian Business School
Mariska J. Vansteensel
Mariska J. Vansteensel Utrecht University
Timo Stein
Timo Stein University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The social sciences and humanities offer a broad range of online degrees tailored to those interested in helping professions, research, or community engagement. One popular route is pursuing cacrep-accredited programs online, which are essential for future counselors seeking licensure and professional credibility.

For individuals passionate about supporting couples and families, online marriage and family therapy graduate programs provide flexible pathways into a rapidly growing field. Many also choose to enroll in the cheapest online psychology degree programs, which deliver foundational skills valued across a variety of careers, from human resources to social services.

Finally, aspiring social workers can explore msw programs that offer easier acceptance requirements while still ensuring high-quality training in advocacy, case management, and therapy. These online degree options create accessible and affordable pathways to impactful careers throughout the social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Raymond van Ee

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles