World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 49 6060 5579 171 160 183 6853
Social Sciences and Humanities 45 3953 3649 163 155 164 6255

Raymond van Ee publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Raymond van Ee between 1996 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Raymond van Ee published across 29 years, from 1996 to 2024, averaging 6.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2010. 3 of the 190 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2010. 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 27 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 1 publication
1996 2024

190 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Raymond van Ee: publications per year, 1996 to 2024
Year Publications
1996 2
1997 2
1998 3
1999 3
2000 2
2001 3
2002 6
2003 6
2004 2
2005 10
2006 11
2007 13
2008 10
2009 4
2010 27
2011 2
2012 5
2013 10
2014 5
2015 10
2016 19
2017 9
2018 6
2019 7
2020 4
2021 4
2022 2
2023 2
2024 1
Total 190
Download as CSV

Raymond van Ee publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raymond van Ee sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 164–173 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 164 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391 164
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Raymond van Ee D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raymond van Ee sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260 45
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Raymond van Ee is a researcher affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands. Their work predominantly falls within the field of Neuroscience, with a specific focus on subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Human-Computer Interaction, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Sensory Systems, and Neurology.

The main topics covered in their research encompass Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts, Neural Dynamics and Brain Function, Visual Perception and Processing Mechanisms, Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction, Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies, Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery, and Musculoskeletal Pain and Rehabilitation.

Among recent publications authored or coauthored by van Ee are:

  • The Use of the Term Virtual Reality in Post-Stroke Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review and Commentary, 2021, Psychologica Belgica
  • Immersive Virtual Reality for Older Adults, 2021, ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing
  • An immersive virtual reality game to train spatial attention orientation after stroke: A feasibility study, 2020, Applied Neuropsychology Adult
  • Intracranial Recordings Reveal Unique Shape and Timing of Responses in Human Visual Cortex during Illusory Visual Events, 2020, Current Biology
  • Deriving a Cortisol-Related Stress Indicator From Wearable Skin Conductance Measurements: Quantitative Model & Experimental Validation, 2020, Frontiers in Computer Science

Van Ee frequently collaborates with several coauthors, including Hanne Huygelier, Céline R. Gillebert, Vero Vanden Abeele, Brenda Schraepen, and Fabienne Schillebeeckx. These coauthorships indicate ongoing collaborative research efforts in related areas.

Their research output is published across various scientific venues, notably Psychologica Belgica, ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing, Applied Neuropsychology Adult, Current Biology, and Frontiers in Computer Science.

Best Publications

  • Acute alerting effects of light: A systematic literature review.

    Jan L Souman;Angelica M Tinga;Susan F Te Pas;Raymond van Ee

  • Horizontal and vertical disparity, eye position, and stereoscopic slant perception

    Benjamin T. Backus;Martin S. Banks;Raymond van Ee;James A. Crowell

  • Acceptance of immersive head-mounted virtual reality in older adults.

    Hanne Huygelier;Brenda Schraepen;Raymond van Ee;Raymond van Ee;Raymond van Ee;Vero Vanden Abeele

  • The time course of binocular rivalry reveals a fundamental role of noise

    Jan W. Brascamp;Raymond van Ee;André J. Noest;Richard H. A. H. Jacobs

  • Percept-choice sequences driven by interrupted ambiguous stimuli: a low-level neural model.

    Unknown

  • Voluntary control and the dynamics of perceptual bi-stability

    Unknown

  • Multisensory congruency as a mechanism for attentional control over perceptual selection.

    Raymond van Ee;Jeroen Johan Adrien van Boxtel;Amanda L Parker;David Alais

  • Distributions of alternation rates in various forms of bistable perception.

    Jan W. Brascamp;Raymond van Ee;Wiebe R. Pestman;Albert V. van den Berg

  • Flash suppression and flash facilitation in binocular rivalry

    Jan W. Brascamp;Tomas H. J. Knapen;Ryota Kanai;Raymond van Ee

  • Stochastic variations in sensory awareness are driven by noisy neuronal adaptation: evidence from serial correlations in perceptual bistability

    Raymond van Ee

  • Dynamics of perceptual bi-stability for stereoscopic slant rivalry and a comparison with grating, house-face, and Necker cube rivalry

    Raymond van Ee

  • Continuous Flash Suppression: Stimulus Fractionation rather than Integration

    Pieter Moors;Guido Hesselmann;Johan Wagemans;Raymond van Ee;Raymond van Ee;Raymond van Ee

  • Multi-Timescale Perceptual History Resolves Visual Ambiguity

    Jan W. Brascamp;Tomas H. J. Knapen;Ryota Kanai;André J. Noest

  • The role of saccades in exerting voluntary control in perceptual and binocular rivalry

    Loes C.J. van Dam;Raymond van Ee

  • Retinal image shifts, but not eye movements per se, cause alternations in awareness during binocular rivalry

    Loes C J van Dam;Raymond van Ee

  • Adaptation to three-dimensional distortions in human vision.

    Wendy J. Adams;Martin S. Banks;Raymond van Ee

  • Early interactions between neuronal adaptation and voluntary control determine perceptual choices in bistable vision.

    Unknown

  • Retinotopic and non-retinotopic stimulus encoding in binocular rivalry and the involvement of feedback

    Jeroen Johan Adrien van Boxtel;David Alais;Raymond van Ee

  • Bayesian modeling of cue interaction: bistability in stereoscopic slant perception

    Raymond Van Ee;Wendy J. J. Adams;Pascal Mamassian

  • "Smooth operator": Music modulates the perceived creaminess, sweetness, and bitterness of chocolate.

    Felipe Reinoso Carvalho;Felipe Reinoso Carvalho;Qian Janice Wang;Raymond van Ee;Dominique Persoone

  • Visual Cortex Allows Prediction of Perceptual States during Ambiguous Structure-From-Motion

    Gijs Joost Brouwer;Raymond van Ee

  • Activation in Visual Cortex Correlates with the Awareness of Stereoscopic Depth

    Gijs Joost Brouwer;Raymond van Ee;Jens Schwarzbach

  • Attending to auditory signals slows visual alternations in binocular rivalry.

    David Alais;Jeroen Johan Adrien van Boxtel;Amanda L Parker;Raymond van Ee

  • The influence of soundscapes on the perception and evaluation of beers

    Felipe Reinoso Carvalho;Felipe Reinoso Carvalho;Qian (Janice) Wang;Raymond Van Ee;Raymond Van Ee;Raymond Van Ee;Charles Spence

Frequent Co-Authors

Ryota Kanai
Ryota Kanai University of Sussex
Charles Spence
Charles Spence University of Oxford
Randolph Blake
Randolph Blake Vanderbilt University
David Alais
David Alais University of Sydney
Denise T. D. de Ridder
Denise T. D. de Ridder Utrecht University
Frans A. J. Verstraten
Frans A. J. Verstraten University of Sydney
Carlos Velasco
Carlos Velasco BI Norwegian Business School
Mariska J. Vansteensel
Mariska J. Vansteensel Utrecht University
Timo Stein
Timo Stein University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The social sciences and humanities offer a broad range of online degrees tailored to those interested in helping professions, research, or community engagement. One popular route is pursuing cacrep-accredited programs online, which are essential for future counselors seeking licensure and professional credibility.

For individuals passionate about supporting couples and families, online marriage and family therapy graduate programs provide flexible pathways into a rapidly growing field. Many also choose to enroll in the cheapest online psychology degree programs, which deliver foundational skills valued across a variety of careers, from human resources to social services.

Finally, aspiring social workers can explore msw programs that offer easier acceptance requirements while still ensuring high-quality training in advocacy, case management, and therapy. These online degree options create accessible and affordable pathways to impactful careers throughout the social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Raymond van Ee

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles