World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Denise T. D. de Ridder

Denise T. D. de Ridder

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 84 1231 1085 69 64 313 25484

Denise T. D. de Ridder publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Denise T. D. de Ridder between 1994 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Denise T. D. de Ridder published across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025, averaging 11.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 37 publications in 2014. 5 of the 357 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 37. Peak 37 publications in 2014. 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 2 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 13 publications 2007: 21 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 24 publications 2013: 27 publications 2014: 37 publications 2015: 35 publications 2016: 32 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 2 publications
1994 2025

357 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Denise T. D. de Ridder: publications per year, 1994 to 2025
Year Publications
1994 1
1995 1
1996 2
1997 3
1998 7
1999 3
2000 2
2001 3
2002 4
2003 6
2004 4
2005 10
2006 13
2007 21
2008 13
2009 11
2010 9
2011 20
2012 24
2013 27
2014 37
2015 35
2016 32
2017 13
2018 12
2019 10
2020 16
2021 11
2022 2
2023 0
2024 3
2025 2
Total 357
Download as CSV

Denise T. D. de Ridder publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Denise T. D. de Ridder sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 311–320 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 313 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100 313
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Denise T. D. de Ridder D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Denise T. D. de Ridder sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 84–85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86 84
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Denise T. D. de Ridder is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands. Their research primarily centers on psychology, with a focus on applied psychology, public health, environmental and occupational health, social psychology, economics and econometrics, and general decision sciences.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics, including behavioral health and interventions, decision-making and behavioral economics, psychological well-being and life satisfaction, mental health research topics, environmental education and sustainability, as well as the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health.

Denise de Ridder has contributed to multiple research publications. Recent notable papers include:

  • Eating behavior and food purchases during the COVID-19 lockdown: A cross-sectional study among adults in the Netherlands (2020) published in Appetite
  • Nudgeability: Mapping Conditions of Susceptibility to Nudge Influence (2021) published in Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • The influence of nudge transparency on the experience of autonomy (2020) published in Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology
  • Practice makes perfect: Repeatedly dealing with response conflict facilitates its identification and speed of resolution (2020) published in Journal of Research in Personality
  • How to Form Good Habits? A Longitudinal Field Study on the Role of Self-Control in Habit Formation (2020) published in Frontiers in Psychology

The publication venues most frequently associated with their work include:

  • Appetite
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • TSG - Tijdschrift voor gezondheidswetenschappen
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • Journal of Research in Personality

Denise de Ridder frequently collaborates with a number of co-authors, including:

  • Marleen Gillebaart
  • Jeroen S. Benjamins
  • Maartje P. Poelman
  • Caroline Schlinkert
  • Floor M. Kroese

Their academic contributions span a significant range of behavioral and social science fields, emphasizing the understanding of behavior change, autonomy, and habit formation within the context of health and environmental challenges. Their work on nudge theory explores conditions that affect susceptibility to behavioral influence as well as transparency effects on autonomy experience. Other studies address behavioral responses to the lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic, examining eating behavior and food purchasing patterns.

Best Publications

  • Taking Stock of Self-Control A Meta-Analysis of How Trait Self-Control Relates to a Wide Range of Behaviors

    Denise T. D. de Ridder;Gerty Lensvelt-Mulders;Catrin Finkenauer;F. Marijn Stok

  • Psychological adjustment to chronic disease.

    Denise de Ridder;Rinie Geenen;Roeline Kuijer;Henriët van Middendorp

  • Patient adherence to medical treatment: a review of reviews.

    Sandra van Dulmen;Emmy M Sluijs;Liset van Dijk;Denise Dt De Ridder

  • The first taste is always with the eyes: A meta-analysis on the neural correlates of processing visual food cues

    L.N. van der Laan;D.T.D. de Ridder;M.A. Viergever;P.A.M. Smeets;P.A.M. Smeets

  • Feeding Your Feelings: Emotion Regulation Strategies and Emotional Eating

    Catharine Evers;F Marijn Stok;Denise T D de Ridder

  • Self-regulation of health behavior: social psychological approaches to goal setting and goal striving.

    Traci L Mann;Denise De Ridder;Kentaro Fujita

  • Coping with chronic diseases.

    Stan Maes;Howard Leventhal;Denise T. D. de Ridder

  • Do implementation intentions help to eat a healthy diet? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the empirical evidence

    Marieke A. Adriaanse;Charlotte D.W. Vinkers;Denise T.D. De Ridder;Joop J. Hox

  • A review of successful aging models: proposing proactive coping as an important additional strategy.

    Carolijn Ouwehand;Denise T.D. de Ridder;Jozien M. Bensing

  • Bedtime Procrastination: Introducing a New Area of Procrastination

    Floor M. Kroese;Denise T. D. De Ridder;Catharine Evers;Marieke A. Adriaanse

  • Healthy diet: Health impact, prevalence, correlates, and interventions

    Denise de Ridder;Floor Kroese;Catharine Evers;Marieke Adriaanse

  • Environmental correlates of physical activity and dietary behaviours among young people: a systematic review of reviews.

    E. de Vet;D. T. D. de Ridder;J. B. F. de Wit;J. B. F. de Wit

  • Don't tell me what I should do, but what others do: The influence of descriptive and injunctive peer norms on fruit consumption in adolescents

    F. Marijn Stok;Denise T. D. de Ridder;Emely de Vet;John B. F. de Wit

  • Nudging healthy food choices: a field experiment at the train station

    Floor M. Kroese;David R. Marchiori;Denise T. D. de Ridder

  • Developing Interventions for Chronically Ill Patients: Is Coping a Helpful Concept?

    Denise de Ridder;Karlein Schreurs

  • When planning is not enough: Fighting unhealthy snacking habits by mental contrasting with implementation intentions (MCII)

    Marieke A. Adriaanse;Gabriele Oettingen;Gabriele Oettingen;Peter M. Gollwitzer;Peter M. Gollwitzer;Erin P. Hennes

  • Not doing bad things is not equivalent to doing the right thing: distinguishing between inhibitory and initiatory self-control

    Denise T.D. de Ridder;Benjamin J. de Boer;Peter Lugtig;Arnold B. Bakker

  • Finding the Critical Cue: Implementation Intentions to Change One's Diet Work Best When Tailored to Personally Relevant Reasons for Unhealthy Eating

    Marieke A. Adriaanse;Denise T. D. de Ridder;John B. F. de Wit

  • Eating behavior and food purchases during the COVID-19 lockdown: A cross-sectional study among adults in the Netherlands.

    Maartje P. Poelman;Marleen Gillebaart;Caroline Schlinkert;S. Coosje Dijkstra

  • Good mood food. Positive emotion as a neglected trigger for food intake

    Catharine Evers;Marieke Adriaanse;Denise T.D. de Ridder;Jessie C. de Witt Huberts

  • Effortless Self-Control: A Novel Perspective on Response Conflict Strategies in Trait Self-Control

    Marleen Gillebaart;Denise T. D. de Ridder

Frequent Co-Authors

Marieke A. Adriaanse
Marieke A. Adriaanse Utrecht University
Catharine Evers
Catharine Evers Utrecht University
Emely de Vet
Emely de Vet Wageningen University & Research
John de Wit
John de Wit Utrecht University
Jozien M. Bensing
Jozien M. Bensing Utrecht University
Bob M. Fennis
Bob M. Fennis University of Groningen
Paul A.M. Smeets
Paul A.M. Smeets Wageningen University & Research
Max A. Viergever
Max A. Viergever Utrecht University
Raymond van Ee
Raymond van Ee Radboud University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA offers a flexible foundation for various rewarding career pathways. Many students now choose online programs for their affordability and convenience, making quality education accessible regardless of location.

If you’re interested in cost-effective options, explore the affordable online psychology programs in Pennsylvania, known for their strong academic standards. Texas also stands out, offering most affordable online psychology degree programs in Texas that cater to a variety of student needs and career ambitions.

Students in specific regions can benefit from targeted research into affordability. For example, check out the most affordable psychology degree programs in Bethlehem or consider the affordable psychology degrees in Boca Raton for additional opportunities.

Whether your goal is clinical practice, counseling, research, or organizational psychology, flexible online programs can open doors. Consider comparing programs and regions to find a degree path that matches both your career aspirations and your financial plan.

Best Scientists Citing Denise T. D. de Ridder

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles