World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Female Scientists
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Best Female Scientists

D-Index
124
Citations
53088
World Ranking
460
National Ranking
46

Medicine

D-Index
125
Citations
52931
World Ranking
3118
National Ranking
313

Carol M. Black publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carol M. Black sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 502 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Carol M. Black D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carol M. Black sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 125 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Female Scientists Award

Overview

Carol M. Black is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans various domains within medicine, with a concentration on immunology, rheumatology, hepatology, genetics, and oncology.

Their work addresses a range of topics including:

  • Immunodeficiency and autoimmune disorders
  • Systemic lupus erythematosus research
  • Hepatitis C virus research
  • Inflammatory bowel disease
  • COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • COVID-19 clinical research studies

Carol M. Black has published in venues such as:

  • Gastroenterology
  • The American Journal of Gastroenterology

Selected recent papers include:

  • Su1780 IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE MEDICATIONS AND ELEVATED CHARLSON COMORBIDITY INDEX ARE ASSOCIATED WITH DECREASED ODDS OF SEROCONVERSION FOLLOWING TWO-DOSE HEPATITIS B VACCINATION (HEPLISAV-B) IN PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE, 2023, Gastroenterology
  • S1181 Gender-Specific Outcomes and Complications in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Hospitalized for COVID-19: A National Analysis, 2023, The American Journal of Gastroenterology

Frequent coauthors include:

  • Christian Karime
  • Jana G. Hashash
  • Francis A. Farraye
  • Pedro Cortés
  • Joshua Kwon

Best Publications

  • Scleroderma (systemic sclerosis): classification, subsets and pathogenesis.

    LeRoy Ec;Black C;Fleischmajer R;Jablonska S

  • Bosentan therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension.

    Lewis J. Rubin;David B. Badesch;Robyn J. Barst;Nazzareno Galiè

  • Interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis: a simple staging system.

    Nicole S. L. Goh;Sujal R. Desai;Srihari Veeraraghavan;David M. Hansell

  • Prevalence and outcome in systemic sclerosis associated pulmonary arterial hypertension: application of a registry approach

    D Mukerjee;D St George;B Coleiro;C Knight

  • Histopathologic subsets of fibrosing alveolitis in patients with systemic sclerosis and their relationship to outcome.

    Demosthenes Bouros;Athol U Wells;Andrew G Nicholson;Andrew G Nicholson;Thomas V Colby

  • A multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of corticosteroids and intravenous cyclophosphamide followed by oral azathioprine for the treatment of pulmonary fibrosis in scleroderma.

    Rachel K Hoyles;Ross W Ellis;Jessica Wellsbury;Belinda Lees

  • Digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis: prevention by treatment with bosentan, an oral endothelin receptor antagonist.

    J. H. Korn;Maureen D Mayes;M. Matucci Cerinic;M. Rainisio

  • Survival with first-line bosentan in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension

    Vv Mclaughlin;O Sitbon;Db Badesch;Rj Barst

  • Family study of the major histocompatibility complex in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: importance of null alleles of C4A and C4B in determining disease susceptibility.

    A H Fielder;M J Walport;J R Batchelor;R I Rynes

  • CTGF and SMADs, Maintenance of Scleroderma Phenotype Is Independent of SMAD Signaling

    Alan Holmes;David J. Abraham;Susan Sa;Xu Shiwen

  • Bosentan treatment of digital ulcers related to systemic sclerosis: results from the RAPIDS-2 randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

    Marco Matucci-Cerinic;Christopher P Denton;Daniel E Furst;Maureen D Mayes

  • Echocardiography and pulmonary function as screening tests for pulmonary arterial hypertension in systemic sclerosis

    D Mukerjee;D St George;C Knight;J Davar

  • A disease severity scale for systemic sclerosis: development and testing.

    T A Medsger;A J Silman;V D Steen;C M Black

  • Recombinant human anti-transforming growth factor β1 antibody therapy in systemic sclerosis: A multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled phase I/II trial of CAT-192

    Christopher P. Denton;Peter A. Merkel;Daniel E. Furst;Dinesh Khanna

  • Scleroderma renal crisis: patient characteristics and long-term outcomes.

    H. Penn;A.J. Howie;E.J. Kingdon;C.C. Bunn

  • Endothelin-1 promotes myofibroblast induction through the ETA receptor via a rac/phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt-dependent pathway and is essential for the enhanced contractile phenotype of fibrotic fibroblasts.

    Xu Shi-Wen;Yunliang Chen;Christopher P. Denton;Mark Eastwood

  • Comparison of Doppler echocardiography and right heart catheterization to assess pulmonary hypertension in systemic sclerosis.

    C P Denton;J B Cailes;G D Phillips;A U Wells

  • Connective tissue growth factor gene regulation. Requirements for its induction by transforming growth factor-beta 2 in fibroblasts.

    Andrew Leask;Alan Holmes;Carol M. Black;David J. Abraham

  • Identification of PLOD2 as Telopeptide Lysyl Hydroxylase, an Important Enzyme in Fibrosis

    Annemarie J. van der Slot;Anne-Marie Zuurmond;Alfons F.J. Bardoel;Cisca Wijmenga

  • Bosentan therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension

    L.J. Rubin;D.B. Badesch;R.J. Barst

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher P. Denton
Christopher P. Denton University College London
David Abraham
David Abraham University College London
George Bou-Gharios
George Bou-Gharios University of Liverpool
Alan J. Silman
Alan J. Silman University of Oxford
Kenneth I. Welsh
Kenneth I. Welsh Imperial College London
Jeremy D. Pearson
Jeremy D. Pearson King's College London
Roland M. du Bois
Roland M. du Bois Imperial College London
Andrew Leask
Andrew Leask University of Saskatchewan
Athol U. Wells
Athol U. Wells Imperial College London
David M. Hansell
David M. Hansell National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Medicine is a rigorous field, but there are alternative and related pathways that can offer greater flexibility. Many students looking for a quicker, cost-effective route to healthcare careers are turning to online degrees and training programs. For example, the cheapest direct entry msn programs let non-nurses transition into advanced nursing roles with less time and financial commitment than traditional medical degrees.

Those looking for a less competitive entry process may be interested in what is the easiest nursing program to get into. Some nursing schools prioritize accessibility, helping more students start a healthcare career with fewer barriers.

For individuals interested in the administrative side of healthcare, medical coding and billing classes online with financial aid offer flexible options and support to skill up for these in-demand roles.

Finally, if you’re seeking accelerated nursing degrees but want to avoid additional entrance exams, you can explore absn programs that don't require teas, which eliminate common standardized testing requirements and help you get started sooner.

Best Scientists Citing Carol M. Black

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles