World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
74
Citations
23032
World Ranking
5523
National Ranking
204

Andrew Leask publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew Leask sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 302 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Andrew Leask D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew Leask sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andrew Leask is affiliated with the University of Saskatchewan in Canada and has contributed significantly to research in the areas of biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine. Their work primarily focuses on molecular biology, pathology, forensic medicine, genetics, immunology, and cell biology.

Leask's research covers various topics within biomedical sciences, including:

  • Connective Tissue Growth Factor Research
  • Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases
  • Hippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ
  • Biomarkers in Disease Mechanisms
  • Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer
  • Dermatologic Treatments and Research
  • Cell Adhesion Molecules Research

The scientist has published extensively in several journals, with frequent appearances in:

  • Journal of Cell Communication and Signaling
  • Matrix Biology
  • Lara D. Veeken
  • Cancer Research
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Among the recent papers by Andrew Leask are:

  • "The Matrix Revolution: Matricellular Proteins and Restructuring of the Cancer Microenvironment" (2020) published in Cancer Research
  • "A CTGF-YAP Regulatory Pathway Is Essential for Angiogenesis and Barriergenesis in the Retina" (2020) published in iScience
  • "Conjunction junction, what's the function? CCN proteins as targets in fibrosis and cancers" (2020) published in American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology
  • "Verteporfin inhibits the persistent fibrotic phenotype of lesional scleroderma dermal fibroblasts" (2021) published in Journal of Cell Communication and Signaling
  • "Epithelial Vasopressin Type-2 Receptors Regulate Myofibroblasts by a YAP-CCN2-Dependent Mechanism in Polycystic Kidney Disease" (2020) published in Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

Leask collaborates regularly with several frequent co-authors, including:

  • Richard Stratton
  • Pratyusha Chitturi
  • Angha Naik
  • A. A. Fadl
  • Shiwen Xu

Best Publications

  • TGF-beta signaling and the fibrotic response.

    Andrew Leask;David J. Abraham

  • All in the CCN family: essential matricellular signaling modulators emerge from the bunker.

    Andrew Leask;David J. Abraham

  • Potential Therapeutic Targets for Cardiac Fibrosis TGFβ, Angiotensin, Endothelin, CCN2, and PDGF, Partners in Fibroblast Activation

    Andrew Leask

  • CTGF and SMADs, Maintenance of Scleroderma Phenotype Is Independent of SMAD Signaling

    Alan Holmes;David J. Abraham;Susan Sa;Xu Shiwen

  • Gene regulation of connective tissue growth factor: new targets for antifibrotic therapy?

    Ingrid E Blom;Roel Goldschmeding;Andrew Leask

  • Regulation and function of connective tissue growth factor/CCN2 in tissue repair, scarring and fibrosis

    Xu Shi-Wen;Andrew Leask;David Abraham

  • Endothelin-1 promotes myofibroblast induction through the ETA receptor via a rac/phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt-dependent pathway and is essential for the enhanced contractile phenotype of fibrotic fibroblasts.

    Xu Shi-Wen;Yunliang Chen;Christopher P. Denton;Mark Eastwood

  • Connective tissue growth factor gene regulation. Requirements for its induction by transforming growth factor-beta 2 in fibroblasts.

    Andrew Leask;Alan Holmes;Carol M. Black;David J. Abraham

  • Getting to the Heart of the Matter: New Insights Into Cardiac Fibrosis

    Andrew Leask

  • Alopecia Universalis Associated with a Mutation in the Human hairless Gene

    Wasim Ahmad;Muhammad Faiyaz ul Haque;Valeria Brancolini;Hui C. Tsou

  • The role of connective tissue growth factor, a multifunctional matricellular protein, in fibroblast biology

    Andrew Leask;David J Abraham

  • Tumor Necrosis Factor α Suppresses the Induction of Connective Tissue Growth Factor by Transforming Growth Factor-β in Normal and Scleroderma Fibroblasts

    David J. Abraham;Xu Shiwen;Carol M. Black;Susan Sa

  • TGFβ, cardiac fibroblasts, and the fibrotic response

    Andrew Leask

  • Wnt1/βcatenin injury response activates the epicardium and cardiac fibroblasts to promote cardiac repair

    Jinzhu Duan;Costin Gherghe;Dianxin Liu;Eric Hamlett

  • CTGF expression in mesangial cells: Involvement of SMADs, MAP kinase, and PKC

    Youjun Chen;Ingrid E. Blom;Ingrid E. Blom;Susan Sa;Susan Sa;Roel Goldschmeding;Roel Goldschmeding

  • Pivotal role of connective tissue growth factor in lung fibrosis: MAPK-dependent transcriptional activation of type I collagen.

    Markella Ponticos;Alan M. Holmes;Xu Shi-Wen;Patricia Leoni

  • Connective tissue growth factor: A new and important player in the pathogenesis of fibrosis

    Andrew Leask;Alan Holmes;David J. Abraham

  • Iloprost suppresses connective tissue growth factor production in fibroblasts and in the skin of scleroderma patients

    Richard Stratton;Xu Shiwen;Giorgia Martini;Alan Holmes

  • Autocrine Overexpression of CTGF Maintains Fibrosis: RDA Analysis of Fibrosis Genes in Systemic Sclerosis

    X. Shi-wen;D. Pennington;A. Holmes;A. Leask

  • Selective expression of connective tissue growth factor in fibroblasts in vivo promotes systemic tissue fibrosis.

    Sonali Sonnylal;Xu Shi-Wen;Patricia Leoni;Katherine Naff

Frequent Co-Authors

David Abraham
David Abraham University College London
Christopher P. Denton
Christopher P. Denton University College London
Carol M. Black
Carol M. Black University College London
George Bou-Gharios
George Bou-Gharios University of Liverpool
Karen M. Lyons
Karen M. Lyons University of California, Los Angeles
Frank Beier
Frank Beier University of Western Ontario
Roland M. du Bois
Roland M. du Bois Imperial College London
Jeremy D. Pearson
Jeremy D. Pearson King's College London
Roel Goldschmeding
Roel Goldschmeding Utrecht University
Paul F. Goetinck
Paul F. Goetinck Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens up a range of career pathways, especially as technology transforms the healthcare sector. Many students are now turning to flexible, online programs that complement their science backgrounds and prepare them for in-demand roles.

For those interested in healthcare data and administration, a health information management degree online teaches how to manage medical data, patient records, and support hospital operations.

If nutrition science fascinates you, an online masters degree in nutrition can help you pursue advanced roles in wellness, dietetics, and community health.

Hands-on, technical careers are also accessible online. You can train for diagnostic imaging jobs through ultrasound tech programs online, or specialize in medical imaging through rad tech online programs.

These online degrees offer a cost-effective, accessible route to professional growth for Biology and Biochemistry graduates, making it easier to upskill or transition into new healthcare fields.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew Leask

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles