World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
43
Citations
6983
World Ranking
19403
National Ranking
7920

Paul F. Goetinck publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul F. Goetinck sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 131 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Paul F. Goetinck D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul F. Goetinck sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul F. Goetinck is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their recent scholarly contributions are published primarily in the journal Developmental Dynamics.

The most notable recent papers authored by or involving Paul F. Goetinck include:

  • Issue Information, 2020, Developmental Dynamics
  • Issue Information, 2021, Developmental Dynamics

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Paul A. Trainor
  • Connie Colbert
  • David M. Ornitz
  • Maria Ros
  • Koji Tamura

The primary publication venue for their work is:

  • Developmental Dynamics

Best Publications

  • Delayed wound repair and impaired angiogenesis in mice lacking syndecan-4

    Frank Echtermeyer;Michael Streit;Sarah Wilcox-Adelman;Stefania Saoncella

  • Syndecan-4 signals cooperatively with integrins in a Rho-dependent manner in the assembly of focal adhesions and actin stress fibers.

    Stefania Saoncella;Frank Echtermeyer;Fabienne Denhez;Julie K. Nowlen

  • Essential and separable roles for Syndecan-3 and Syndecan-4 in skeletal muscle development and regeneration.

    D.D.W. Cornelison;Sarah A. Wilcox-Adelman;Paul F. Goetinck;Heikki Rauvala

  • Phosphoinositide 3-kinase signaling to Akt promotes keratinocyte differentiation versus death.

    Enzo Calautti;Jian Li;Stefania Saoncella;Janice L. Brissette

  • The tandemly repeated sequences of cartilage link protein contain the sites for interaction with hyaluronic acid.

    P F Goetinck;N S Stirpe;P A Tsonis;D Carlone

  • Matrix Contraction by Dermal Fibroblasts Requires Transforming Growth Factor-β/Activin-Linked Kinase 5, Heparan Sulfate-Containing Proteoglycans, and MEK/ERK: Insights into Pathological Scarring in Chronic Fibrotic Disease

    Yunliang Chen;Xu Shi-wen;Jonathan van Beek;Laura Kennedy

  • Syndecan-4 modulates focal adhesion kinase phosphorylation

    Sarah A. Wilcox-Adelman;Fabienne Denhez;Paul F. Goetinck

  • Protein kinase C regulates the recruitment of syndecan-4 into focal contacts.

    P C Baciu;P F Goetinck

  • Inhibition of pulmonary fibrosis in mice by CXCL10 requires glycosaminoglycan binding and syndecan-4

    Dianhua Jiang;Jiurong Liang;Gabriele S. Campanella;Rishu Guo

  • Structure of the gene for cartilage matrix protein, a modular protein of the extracellular matrix. Exon/intron organization, unusual splice sites, and relation to alpha chains of beta 2 integrins, von Willebrand factor, complement factors B and C2, and epidermal growth factor.

    I Kiss;F Deák;R G Holloway;H Delius

  • Cartilage matrix protein is a component of the collagen fibril of cartilage.

    Neil Winterbottom;M. Mehrdad Tondravi;Terrill L. Harrington;F. George Klier

  • Syndecan-4 core protein is sufficient for the assembly of focal adhesions and actin stress fibers

    Frank Echtermeyer;Peter C. Baciu;Stefania Saoncella;Yimin Ge

  • Progression and Recapitulation of the Chondrocyte Differentiation Program: Cartilage Matrix Protein Is a Marker for Cartilage Maturation

    Qian Chen;David M. Johnson;Dominik R. Haudenschild;Paul F. Goetinck

  • Link protein is ubiquitously expressed in non-cartilaginous tissues where it enhances and stabilizes the interaction of proteoglycans with hyaluronic acid.

    François Binette;Janet Cravens;Behnam Kahoussi;Dominik R Haudenschild

  • Synthesis of proteochondroitin sulfate by normal, nanomelic, and 5-bromodeoxyuridine-treated chondrocytes in cell culture.

    M. J. Palmoski;P. F. Goetinck

  • Proteochondroitin sulfate synthesis and chondrogenic expression.

    P.F. Goetinck;J.P. Pennypacker;Patricia D. Royal

  • Structural features of cartilage matrix protein deduced from cDNA

    W S Argraves;F Deák;K J Sparks;I Kiss

  • Fibroblast growth factor 2 can replace ectodermal signaling for feather development.

    Heekyung Song;Yuying Wang;Paul F. Goetinck

  • Complete amino acid sequence of chicken cartilage link protein deduced from cDNA clones

    F Deák;I Kiss;K J Sparks;W S Argraves

  • Assembly of a Novel Cartilage Matrix Protein Filamentous Network: Molecular Basis of Differential Requirement of von Willebrand Factor A Domains

    Qian Chen;Yue Zhang;David M. Johnson;Paul F. Goetinck

Frequent Co-Authors

David Abraham
David Abraham University College London
W S Argraves
W S Argraves Medical University of South Carolina
Panagiotis A. Tsonis
Panagiotis A. Tsonis University of Dayton
Andrew Leask
Andrew Leask University of Saskatchewan
Carol M. Black
Carol M. Black University College London
Srdjan Djurovic
Srdjan Djurovic Oslo University Hospital
Jerry B. Dodgson
Jerry B. Dodgson Michigan State University
Sally L. Dunwoodie
Sally L. Dunwoodie Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute
Nicholas D. Hastie
Nicholas D. Hastie University of Edinburgh
Susan J. Lamont
Susan J. Lamont Iowa State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re studying Biology or Biochemistry in the USA, it’s important to be aware of alternative and complementary career options, especially through online degree programs and certifications. Online programs can be a flexible route, allowing you to continue your education while gaining practical skills relevant to today’s healthcare job market.

For example, an online healthcare mba programs can open doors to management and leadership roles within hospitals, biotech companies, or healthcare organizations. This pathway enables science graduates to move into administration or policy-making positions.

If you’re interested in the technical aspects of healthcare, medical coding and billing is a fast-growing field. Curious about which credential is best? Read this breakdown of ccs vs cpc to compare the main certifications, their differences, and their impact on salary prospects.

Wondering about earning potential? Find out how much do medical coders make based on experience and geography. To weigh the pros and cons of this career, see is medical billing and coding worth it for honest insights and advice on this potential career pathway.

Best Scientists Citing Paul F. Goetinck