World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 47 6178 5743 292 287 203 8838

Britta Renner publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Britta Renner between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Britta Renner published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 8.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2016. 21 of the 255 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2016. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 21 publications 2016: 22 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 21 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 11 publications
1996 2025

255 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Britta Renner: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 2
1998 2
1999 0
2000 3
2001 2
2002 0
2003 5
2004 1
2005 2
2006 5
2007 6
2008 13
2009 12
2010 6
2011 9
2012 11
2013 9
2014 12
2015 21
2016 22
2017 17
2018 16
2019 13
2020 12
2021 21
2022 7
2023 4
2024 10
2025 11
Total 255
Download as CSV

Britta Renner publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Britta Renner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 201–210 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 203 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328 203
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Britta Renner D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Britta Renner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 47
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Britta Renner is affiliated with the University of Konstanz in Germany. Their scholarly work primarily centers on psychology, with a significant focus on public health, environmental and occupational health, applied psychology, general health professions, clinical psychology, and sociology and political science.

The core research topics associated with Britta Renner include behavioral health and interventions, obesity, physical activity, diet, eating disorders and behaviors, consumer attitudes and food labeling, nutritional studies and diet, mobile health and mHealth applications, as well as COVID-19 and mental health.

Britta Renner has contributed to several recent academic papers. Notable publications include:

  • "Barriers to and Facilitators for Using Nutrition Apps: Systematic Review and Conceptual Framework" (2021) published in JMIR mhealth and uhealth
  • "Similar or different? Comparing food cultures with regard to traditional and modern eating across ten countries" (2022) published in Food Research International
  • "Occurrence of and Reasons for 'Missing Events' in Mobile Dietary Assessments: Results From Three Event-Based Ecological Momentary Assessment Studies" (2020) published in JMIR mhealth and uhealth
  • "Effects of a Collective Family-Based Mobile Health Intervention Called 'SMARTFAMILY' on Promoting Physical Activity and Healthy Eating: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial" (2020) published in JMIR Research Protocols
  • "The Role of Personal Risk Experience-An Investigation of Health and Terrorism Risk Perception in Germany and Israel" (2021) published in Risk Analysis

Frequent collaborators in Britta Renner's research include Harald T. Schupp, Karoline Villinger, Gudrun Sproesser, Nadine C. Lages, and Luka J. Debbeler.

Publications appear regularly in various academic venues, with multiple contributions in:

  • Econstor (6 publications)
  • JMIR mhealth and uhealth (3 publications)
  • Frontiers in Psychology (3 publications)
  • Risk Analysis (2 publications)
  • Advances in Nutrition (2 publications)

Renner's research spans a range of subfields indicating an interdisciplinary approach to psychological and health-related topics. The investigation of behavioral health and mobile health interventions aligns with their focus on practical methods to improve diet and physical activity patterns, as well as responses to current public health challenges such as COVID-19.

Best Publications

  • Social-cognitive predictors of health behavior: action self-efficacy and coping self-efficacy.

    Ralf Schwarzer;Britta Renner

  • Why we eat what we eat. The Eating Motivation Survey (TEMS)

    Britta Renner;Gudrun Sproesser;Stefanie Strohbach;Harald T. Schupp

  • Opportunities and challenges of Web 2.0 for vaccination decisions.

    Cornelia Betsch;Noel T. Brewer;Pauline Brocard;Patrick Davies

  • The effectiveness of app-based mobile interventions on nutrition behaviours and nutrition-related health outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Karoline Villinger;Deborah R. Wahl;Heiner Boeing;Harald T. Schupp

  • Curiosity about people: the development of a social curiosity measure in adults.

    Britta Renner

  • The DONE framework: Creation, evaluation, and updating of an interdisciplinary, dynamic framework 2.0 of determinants of nutrition and eating

    F. Marijn Stok;Stefan Hoffmann;Dorothee Volkert;Heiner Boeing

  • Understanding Eating Behavior during the Transition from Adolescence to Young Adulthood : A Literature Review and Perspective on Future Research Directions

    F. Marijn Stok;Britta Renner;Peter Clarys;Nanna Lien

  • Does age make a difference? Predicting physical activity of South Koreans.

    Britta Renner;Youlia Spivak;Sunkyo Kwon;Ralf Schwarzer

  • Determinants of diet and physical activity (DEDIPAC): a summary of findings.

    Johannes Brug;Hidde P. van der Ploeg;Hidde P. van der Ploeg;Anne Loyen;Wolfgang Ahrens

  • Self‐Efficacy and Planning Predict Dietary Behaviors in Costa Rican and South Korean Women: Two Moderated Mediation Analyses

    Benicio Gutiérrez-Doña;Sonia Lippke;Britta Renner;Sunkyo Kwon

  • Social-cognitive predictors of dietary behaviors in South Korean men and women.

    Britta Renner;Sunkyo Kwon;Byung-Hwan Yang;Ki-Chung Paik

  • Social‐Cognitive Factors in Health Behavior Change

    Britta Renner;Ralf Schwarzer

  • Barriers to and facilitators for using nutrition apps : systematic review and conceptual framework

    Laura Maria König;Christiane Attig;Thomas Franke;Britta Renner

  • Predictors of food decision making: A systematic interdisciplinary mapping (SIM) review.

    Claudia Symmank;Claudia Symmank;Robert Mai;Stefan Hoffmann;F. Marijn Stok

  • Age and Body Make a Difference in Optimistic Health Beliefs and Nutrition Behaviors

    Britta Renner;Nina Knoll;Ralf Schwarzer

  • Gender differences in social cognitive determinants of exercise adoption.

    Nelli Hankonen;Pilvikki Absetz;Paolo Ghisletta;Britta Renner

  • The motivation to eat a healthy diet: How intenders and nonintenders differ in terms of risk perception, outcome expectancies, self-efficacy, and nutrition behavior.

    Britta Renner;Ralf Schwarzer

  • The Bright Side of Stress-Induced Eating Eating More When Stressed but Less When Pleased

    Gudrun Sproesser;Harald T. Schupp;Britta Renner

  • Understanding traditional and modern eating: The TEP10 framework

    Gudrun Sproesser;Matthew B. Ruby;Naomi Arbit;Charity S. Akotia

  • Dietary Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Conceptual Analysis and Taxonomy.

    F. Marijn Stok;Britta Renner;Julia Allan;Heiner Boeing

  • Emotion and the processing of symbolic gestures: an event-related brain potential study

    Tobias Flaisch;Frank Häcker;Britta Renner;Harald T. Schupp

  • Perception of health risks: How smoker status affects defensive optimism

    André Hahn;Britta Renner

  • Prediction of attendance at fitness center: a comparison between the theory of planned behavior, the social cognitive theory, and the physical activity maintenance theory

    Darko Jekauc;Darko Jekauc;Manuel Völkle;Matthias O. Wagner;Filip Mess

Frequent Co-Authors

Harald T. Schupp
Harald T. Schupp University of Konstanz
Ralf Schwarzer
Ralf Schwarzer Freie Universität Berlin
Paul Rozin
Paul Rozin University of Pennsylvania
Nanna Lien
Nanna Lien University of Oslo
Harald Reiterer
Harald Reiterer University of Konstanz
Jeroen Lakerveld
Jeroen Lakerveld University of Amsterdam
Peter M. Gollwitzer
Peter M. Gollwitzer New York University
Johannes Brug
Johannes Brug Utrecht University
Heiner Boeing
Heiner Boeing German Institute of Human Nutrition
Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij
Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij Ghent University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As interest in psychology grows, more students are exploring flexible online degree options across the country. Online psychology programs allow you to learn at your own pace and provide access to specialized concentrations, such as clinical psychology, counseling, or organizational behavior.

When looking for quality programs, it’s important to consider accredited universities with strong support services and experienced faculty. For those seeking local or regional excellence, the top psychology programs in Georgia offer a mix of traditional and online options, preparing graduates for diverse careers. Similarly, the best psychology degree programs ranking in Grand Forks highlights institutions known for innovation and flexibility.

Expanding your search, the top psychology degrees in Grand Rapids provide excellent training with a focus on both undergraduate and graduate pathways. In the Southeast, the top psychology degrees in Greenville are noted for hands-on learning and robust student support.

With so many online options, pursuing a psychology degree can open doors to careers in mental health, business, education, research, and beyond. Be sure to review program rankings, course offerings, and accreditation to make an informed decision.

Best Scientists Citing Britta Renner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles