World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Psychology
UK
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 101 596 520 80 72 544 39619
Medicine 104 6995 6581 681 649 635 45202

Theresa M. Marteau publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Theresa M. Marteau between 1984 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Theresa M. Marteau published across 42 years, from 1984 to 2025, averaging 16.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 41 publications in 2018. 10 of the 695 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 41. Peak 41 publications in 2018. 1984: 3 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 7 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 10 publications 1990: 9 publications 1991: 8 publications 1992: 13 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 13 publications 1995: 13 publications 1996: 16 publications 1997: 12 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 15 publications 2000: 14 publications 2001: 21 publications 2002: 22 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 17 publications 2005: 20 publications 2006: 22 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 30 publications 2009: 20 publications 2010: 22 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 25 publications 2013: 35 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 22 publications 2017: 23 publications 2018: 41 publications 2019: 31 publications 2020: 38 publications 2021: 32 publications 2022: 24 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 6 publications
1984 2025

695 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Theresa M. Marteau: publications per year, 1984 to 2025
Year Publications
1984 3
1985 3
1986 2
1987 7
1988 3
1989 10
1990 9
1991 8
1992 13
1993 7
1994 13
1995 13
1996 16
1997 12
1998 7
1999 15
2000 14
2001 21
2002 22
2003 11
2004 17
2005 20
2006 22
2007 15
2008 30
2009 20
2010 22
2011 20
2012 25
2013 35
2014 13
2015 18
2016 22
2017 23
2018 41
2019 31
2020 38
2021 32
2022 24
2023 8
2024 4
2025 6
Total 695
Download as CSV

Theresa M. Marteau publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Theresa M. Marteau sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 541–550 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 544 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14 544
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Theresa M. Marteau D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Theresa M. Marteau sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 100–101 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 101 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57 101
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in United Kingdom Leader Award

Overview

Theresa M. Marteau is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Psychology, with a focus on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, and Physiology.

The main topics covered in their work include Behavioral Health and Interventions, Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet, Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling, Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact, Smoking Behavior and Cessation, Nutritional Studies and Diet, and Eating Disorders and Behaviors.

Marteau has contributed to numerous publications, frequently publishing in venues such as Apollo (University of Cambridge), Addiction, BMC Public Health, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), and BMJ.

Some of their recent papers are:

  • "Biodiversity conservation as a promising frontier for behavioural science" (2021) published in Nature Human Behaviour
  • "Five rules for evidence communication" (2020) published in Nature
  • "Effect of Information about COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness and Side Effects on Behavioural Intentions: Two Online Experiments" (2021) published in Vaccines
  • "Is risk compensation threatening public health in the covid-19 pandemic?" (2020) published in BMJ
  • "Making more effective use of human behavioural science in conservation interventions" (2021) published in Biological Conservation

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Marteau include Gareth J. Hollands, Mark Pilling, Katie De-loyde, Emily Pechey, and Anna Blackwell.

Best Publications

  • The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)

    Theresa M. Marteau;Hilary Bekker

  • Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development.

    M K Murphy;N A Black;D L Lamping;C M McKee

  • The place of inter-rater reliability in qualitative research: an empirical study.

    David Armstrong;Ann Gosling;John Weinman;Theresa Marteau

  • A measure of informed choice.

    Theresa M. Marteau;Elizabeth Dormandy;Susan Michie

  • Changing human behavior to prevent disease: The importance of targeting automatic processes.

    Theresa M. Marteau;Gareth J. Hollands;Paul C. Fletcher

  • Judging nudging: can nudging improve population health?

    Theresa M Marteau;David Ogilvie;Martin Roland;Marc Suhrcke

  • Public acceptability of government intervention to change health-related behaviours: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.

    Stephanie Diepeveen;Tom Ling;Marc Suhrcke;Marc Suhrcke;Martin Roland

  • An implementation research agenda

    Martin P Eccles;David Armstrong;Richard Baker;Kevin Cleary

  • Will genetics revolutionize medicine

    Neil A. Holtzman;Theresa M. Marteau

  • The impact of communicating genetic risks of disease on risk-reducing health behaviour: systematic review with meta-analysis

    Gareth J Hollands;David P French;Simon J Griffin;A Toby Prevost

  • Consensus development methods: a review of best practice in creating clinical guidelines

    Nick Black;Maggie Murphy;Donna Lamping;Martin McKee

  • Randomised controlled trial evaluating cardiovascular screening and intervention in general practice: principal results of British family heart study

    D A Wood;A L Kinmonth;G A Davies;J Yarwood

  • THE TROUBLED HELIX: SOCIAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE NEW HUMAN GENETICS

    Theresa Marteau;Martin Richards

  • Psychological consequences of predictive genetic testing: a systematic review

    Marita Broadstock;Susan Michie;Theresa Marteau

  • Genetic risk and behavioural change

    Theresa M Marteau;Caryn Lerman

  • Altering micro-environments to change population health behaviour: towards an evidence base for choice architecture interventions

    Gareth J Hollands;Ian Shemilt;Theresa M Marteau;Susan A Jebb;Susan A Jebb

  • Portion, package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco.

    Gareth J Hollands;Ian Shemilt;Theresa M Marteau;Susan A Jebb

  • Self-regulation and the behavioural response to DNA risk information: a theoretical analysis and framework for future research.

    Theresa M. Marteau;John Weinman

  • General practitioners' and family physicians' negative beliefs and attitudes towards discussing smoking cessation with patients: a systematic review.

    Florian Vogt;Sue Hall;Theresa M. Marteau

  • Lay Understanding of Familial Risk of Common Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review and Synthesis of Qualitative Research

    Fiona M. Walter;Jon Emery;Dejana Braithwaite;Theresa M. Marteau

  • Public Acceptability of Government Intervention to Change Health-Related Behaviours

    Stephanie Diepeveen;Tom Ling;Marc Suhrcke;Martin Roland

Frequent Co-Authors

Susan Michie
Susan Michie University College London
Susan A. Jebb
Susan A. Jebb University of Oxford
Stephen Sutton
Stephen Sutton University of Cambridge
Marcus R. Munafò
Marcus R. Munafò University of Bath
David P. French
David P. French University of Manchester
Marie Johnston
Marie Johnston University of Aberdeen
John Weinman
John Weinman King's College London
Richard W Morris
Richard W Morris University of Bristol
Marc Suhrcke
Marc Suhrcke University of York
Paul C. Fletcher
Paul C. Fletcher University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to a range of online degrees and rewarding career paths, especially in counseling and mental health services. Many students pursue advanced degrees in clinical psychology, counseling, or social work as a step toward licensure and professional practice.

Becoming a Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC) is a popular choice. However, lpc license requirements in New Mexico, for instance, differ in coursework, supervised experience, and exam standards. Similarly, understanding lpc licensure requirements in New York is crucial for those planning to practice in that state, as each jurisdiction sets its own rules.

If you’re interested in working in other states, it’s vital to be aware of distinct regulations. For example, North Carolina licensed professional counselor requirements prioritize specific practicum hours and require passage of national examinations. Meanwhile, North Dakota lpc licensure requirements have their own standards for supervised practice and continuing education.

As online programs become more prevalent, it is essential for aspiring counselors to research licensure requirements in their desired state, select accredited degrees, and stay informed about evolving career opportunities in the field.

Best Scientists Citing Theresa M. Marteau

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles