World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 63 1184 1043 225 201 303 14613

Jean Adams publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jean Adams between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jean Adams published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 16.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 43 publications in 2023. 66 of the 440 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 43. Peak 43 publications in 2023. 2000: 2 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 17 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 11 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 4 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 33 publications 2015: 32 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 31 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 30 publications 2020: 24 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 30 publications 2023: 43 publications 2024: 39 publications 2025: 27 publications
2000 2025

440 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jean Adams: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 2
2001 5
2002 2
2003 5
2004 17
2005 7
2006 6
2007 5
2008 1
2009 11
2010 1
2011 4
2012 13
2013 7
2014 33
2015 32
2016 21
2017 31
2018 21
2019 30
2020 24
2021 23
2022 30
2023 43
2024 39
2025 27
Total 440
Download as CSV

Jean Adams publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean Adams sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 294–303 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 303 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106 303
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Jean Adams D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean Adams sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77 63
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Jean Adams is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom and has a research focus primarily in the field of Medicine, with extensive contributions to Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Their work covers a range of topics related to obesity, diet, and public health policies.

The scientist's major topics of study include:

  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
  • Obesity and Health Practices
  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors

Jean Adams has published extensively across several prominent venues, with frequent publications in:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • SSM Annual Scientific Meeting
  • PLoS Medicine
  • BMJ Open
  • Health & Place

Some recent notable papers authored or co-authored by Jean Adams include:

  • "Impact of the announcement and implementation of the UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy on sugar content, price, product size and number of available soft drinks in the UK, 2015-19: A controlled interrupted time series analysis" (2020, PLoS Medicine)
  • "Use of Online Food Delivery Services to Order Food Prepared Away-From-Home and Associated Sociodemographic Characteristics: A Cross-Sectional, Multi-Country Analysis" (2020, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health)
  • "RETRACTED: Changes in soft drinks purchased by British households associated with the UK soft drinks industry levy: controlled interrupted time series analysis" (2021, BMJ)
  • "Public health response to ultra-processed food and drinks" (2020, BMJ)
  • "Associations between trajectories of obesity prevalence in English primary school children and the UK soft drinks industry levy: An interrupted time series analysis of surveillance data" (2023, PLoS Medicine)

Jean Adams has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Martin White
  • Steven Cummins
  • Thomas Burgoine
  • Oliver Mytton
  • Richard Smith

Best Publications

  • The Lancet Commission on diabetes: using data to transform diabetes care and patient lives

    Juliana C N Chan;Lee-Ling Lim;Nicholas J Wareham;Jonathan E Shaw

  • Why Are Some Population Interventions for Diet and Obesity More Equitable and Effective Than Others? The Role of Individual Agency

    Jean Adams;Oliver Mytton;Martin White;Pablo Monsivais

  • Searching and synthesising ‘grey literature’ and ‘grey information’ in public health: critical reflections on three case studies

    Jean Adams;Jean Adams;Frances C. Hillier-Brown;Frances C. Hillier-Brown;Helen J. Moore;Helen J. Moore;Amelia A. Lake;Amelia A. Lake

  • The effectiveness of financial incentives for health behaviour change: systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Emma L. Giles;Shannon Robalino;Elaine McColl;Falko F. Sniehotta

  • Why don't stage-based activity promotion interventions work?

    JM Adams;M White

  • Time perspective, personality and smoking, body mass, and physical activity: An empirical study

    Jean Adams;Daniel Nettle

  • Are school-based physical activity interventions effective and equitable? A meta-analysis of cluster randomized controlled trials with accelerometer-assessed activity

    Rebecca Love;Jean Adams;Esther M. F. van Sluijs

  • Are activity promotion interventions based on the transtheoretical model effective? A critical review

    JM Adams;M White

  • How and why do interventions that increase health overall widen inequalities within populations

    Martin White;Jean Adams;Peter Heywood

  • Health and social determinants and outcomes of home cooking: A systematic review of observational studies.

    Susanna Mills;Martin White;Martin White;Heather Brown;Wendy Wrieden

  • Frequency of eating home cooked meals and potential benefits for diet and health: cross-sectional analysis of a population-based cohort study

    Susanna Mills;Heather Brown;Wendy Wrieden;Martin White;Martin White

  • Characterisation of UK diets according to degree of food processing and associations with socio-demographics and obesity: cross-sectional analysis of UK National Diet and Nutrition Survey (2008–12)

    Jean Margaret Adams;Martin James White

  • Impact of the announcement and implementation of the UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy on sugar content, price, product size and number of available soft drinks in the UK, 2015-19: A controlled interrupted time series analysis.

    Peter Scarborough;Vyas Adhikari;Richard A. Harrington;Ahmed Elhussein

  • Frequency and socio-demographic correlates of eating meals out and take-away meals at home: cross-sectional analysis of the UK national diet and nutrition survey, waves 1–4 (2008–12)

    Jean Adams;Jean Adams;Louis Goffe;Tamara Brown;Amelia A Lake

  • Global benchmarking of children's exposure to television advertising of unhealthy foods and beverages across 22 countries

    Bridget Kelly;Stefanie Vandevijvere;See Hoe Ng;Jean Adams

  • Socioeconomic Inequalities in Lung Cancer Treatment: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Lynne F. Forrest;Jean Adams;Helen Wareham;Greg Rubin

  • Effect of Restrictions on Television Food Advertising to Children on Exposure to Advertisements for 'Less Healthy' Foods: Repeat Cross-sectional Study

    Jean Adams;Rachel Tyrrell;Ashley J. Adamson;Martin White

  • Use of Online Food Delivery Services to Order Food Prepared Away-From-Home and Associated Sociodemographic Characteristics: A Cross-Sectional, Multi-Country Analysis

    Matthew Keeble;Jean Adams;Gary Sacks;Lana Vanderlee

  • Biological ageing A fundamental, biological link between socio-economic status and health?

    Jean M Adams;Martin White

  • Carrots, sticks and health behaviours: a framework for documenting the complexity of financial incentive interventions to change health behaviours

    Jean Adams;Emma L Giles;Elaine McColl;Falko F Sniehotta

Frequent Co-Authors

Susan Michie
Susan Michie University College London
Falko F. Sniehotta
Falko F. Sniehotta Newcastle University
Carolyn Summerbell
Carolyn Summerbell Durham University
Steven Cummins
Steven Cummins London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Martine Stead
Martine Stead University of Stirling
Christopher Patterson
Christopher Patterson Queen's University Belfast
Nigel Unwin
Nigel Unwin University of Cambridge
Mark A. Tully
Mark A. Tully University of Ulster
David P. French
David P. French University of Manchester
Frank Kee
Frank Kee Queen's University Belfast

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens a variety of career opportunities, especially through flexible online learning. Many students pursue advanced degrees like msw programs (Master of Social Work) to work in clinical or community settings. These online degrees are designed to be more affordable and accessible, all while maintaining rigorous academic standards.

For those interested in behavior analysis, the demand for professionals is rising. Options such as online bcba masters programs offer specialized credentials needed to become Board Certified Behavior Analysts, a pathway leading to careers in education, healthcare, and therapy.

Time-saving alternatives are also available. Aspiring social workers can enroll in accelerated masters in social work programs, allowing them to fast-track their education and enter the workforce sooner.

If psychology is your focus, pursuing an accelerated psychology bachelor's degree online can lead to entry-level positions in mental health, social services, or pave the way for further graduate studies. Online degrees in these areas provide the flexibility and affordability needed for aspiring professionals to reach their goals.

Best Scientists Citing Jean Adams

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles