World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 53 2272 2067 90 85 189 13295

Jeroen Lakerveld publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jeroen Lakerveld between 2008 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jeroen Lakerveld published across 18 years, from 2008 to 2025, averaging 15.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 2022. 52 of the 274 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2008 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 2022. 2008: 4 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 30 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 22 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 31 publications 2023: 22 publications 2024: 22 publications 2025: 30 publications
2008 2025

274 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jeroen Lakerveld: publications per year, 2008 to 2025
Year Publications
2008 4
2009 0
2010 2
2011 3
2012 4
2013 6
2014 10
2015 9
2016 30
2017 22
2018 16
2019 19
2020 22
2021 22
2022 31
2023 22
2024 22
2025 30
Total 274
Download as CSV

Jeroen Lakerveld publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeroen Lakerveld sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 184–193 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 189 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319 189
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Jeroen Lakerveld D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeroen Lakerveld sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141 53
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Jeroen Lakerveld is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily intersects the fields of Medicine and Social Sciences, with a particular focus on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Transportation, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, and Physiology.

The main topics addressed in Lakerveld's research include:

  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Physical Activity and Health
  • Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Noise Effects and Management

Recent notable papers authored or co-authored by Lakerveld include:

  • "Associations between the built environment and obesity: an umbrella review," 2021, International Journal of Health Geographics
  • "The effects of nudging and pricing on healthy food purchasing behavior in a virtual supermarket setting: a randomized experiment," 2020, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
  • "The evidence for the impact of policy on physical activity outcomes within the school setting: A systematic review," 2021, Journal of Sport and Health Science
  • "Recent changes in the Dutch foodscape: socioeconomic and urban-rural differences," 2020, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
  • "Advancing the evidence base for public policies impacting on dietary behaviour, physical activity and sedentary behaviour in Europe: The Policy Evaluation Network promoting a multidisciplinary approach," 2020, Food Policy

Lakerveld frequently collaborates with several researchers, including Joline W. J. Beulens, Nicolette R. den Braver, Joreintje D. Mackenbach, Catherine Woods, and Joanna Żukowska. These collaborations have contributed to a breadth of work spanning public health and behavioral nutrition.

Key publication venues where Lakerveld's work appears repeatedly include:

  • European Journal of Public Health
  • International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
  • Environment International
  • BMC Medicine
  • Health & Place

The body of Lakerveld's work spans 144 publications classified under Medicine and 73 under Social Sciences. Within these broad categories, a significant number focus on public health-related subfields such as occupational and environmental health and transportation aspects related to health outcomes.

Best Publications

  • Sedentary behavior research network (SBRN) - terminology consensus project process and outcome

    Mark S. Tremblay;Salomé Aubert;Joel D. Barnes;Travis J. Saunders

  • Successful behavior change in obesity interventions in adults: a systematic review of self-regulation mediators

    Pedro J Teixeira;Eliana V Carraça;Marta M Marques;Harry Rutter

  • A systematic review of correlates of sedentary behaviour in adults aged 18–65 years: a socio-ecological approach

    Grainne O’Donoghue;Camille Perchoux;Keitly Mensah;Jeroen Lakerveld

  • Obesogenic environments: a systematic review of the association between the physical environment and adult weight status, the SPOTLIGHT project

    Joreintje D Mackenbach;Harry Rutter;Sofie Compernolle;Ketevan Glonti

  • A life course examination of the physical environmental determinants of physical activity behaviour: A “Determinants of Diet and Physical Activity” (DEDIPAC) umbrella systematic literature review

    Angela Carlin;Camille Perchoux;Anna Puggina;Katina Aleksovska

  • Understanding Eating Behavior during the Transition from Adolescence to Young Adulthood : A Literature Review and Perspective on Future Research Directions

    F. Marijn Stok;Britta Renner;Peter Clarys;Nanna Lien

  • Built environmental characteristics and diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    N. R. den Braver;J. Lakerveld;F. Rutters;L. J. Schoonmade

  • Sedentary Time and Physical Activity Surveillance Through Accelerometer Pooling in Four European Countries

    Anne Loyen;Alexandra M. Clarke-Cornwell;Sigmund A. Anderssen;Maria Hagströmer

  • Variation in population levels of sedentary time in European children and adolescents according to cross-European studies: a systematic literature review within DEDIPAC.

    Linde Van Hecke;Linde Van Hecke;Anne Loyen;Maïté Verloigne;Hidde P. van der Ploeg;Hidde P. van der Ploeg

  • Variation in population levels of physical activity in European children and adolescents according to cross-European studies: a systematic literature review within DEDIPAC

    Unknown

  • The SOS-framework (Systems of Sedentary behaviours): An international transdisciplinary consensus framework for the study of determinants, research priorities and policy on sedentary behaviour across the life course: A DEDIPAC-study

    Sebastien F. M. Chastin;Marieke De Craemer;Nanna Lien;Claire Bernaards

  • Determinants of diet and physical activity (DEDIPAC): a summary of findings.

    Johannes Brug;Hidde P. van der Ploeg;Hidde P. van der Ploeg;Anne Loyen;Wolfgang Ahrens

  • The Upstream Determinants of Adult Obesity

    Jeroen Lakerveld;Joreintje Mackenbach

  • European Sitting Championship: Prevalence and Correlates of Self-Reported Sitting Time in the 28 European Union Member States

    Anne Loyen;Hidde P. van der Ploeg;Hidde P. van der Ploeg;Adrian Bauman;Johannes Brug

  • Motives for (not) participating in a lifestyle intervention trial

    Jeroen Lakerveld;Jeroen Lakerveld;Wilhelmina IJzelenberg;Maurits W van Tulder;Irene M Hellemans

  • Exploring the relationship between perceived barriers to healthy eating and dietary behaviours in European adults

    M. G. M. Pinho;J. D. Mackenbach;H. Charreire;J.-M. Oppert;J.-M. Oppert

  • Built environmental correlates of cycling for transport across Europe.

    Lieze Mertens;Sofie Compernolle;Benedicte Deforche;Joreintje D. Mackenbach

  • Associations between the built environment and obesity: an umbrella review

    Thao Minh Lam;Thao Minh Lam;Ilonca Vaartjes;Diederick E. Grobbee;Derek Karssenberg

  • The SPOTLIGHT virtual audit tool: a valid and reliable tool to assess obesogenic characteristics of the built environment

    John R. Bethlehem;Joreintje D. Mackenbach;Maher Ben-Rebah;Sofie Compernolle

  • Variation in population levels of physical activity in European adults according to cross-European studies: a systematic literature review within DEDIPAC

    Anne Loyen;Linde Van Hecke;Linde Van Hecke;Maïté Verloigne;Ingrid J.M. Hendriksen

  • Motivational interviewing and problem solving treatment to reduce type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease risk in real life: a randomized controlled trial

    Jeroen Lakerveld;Sandra D Bot;Mai Jm Chinapaw;Maurits W van Tulder

  • Using remote sensing to define environmental characteristics related to physical activity and dietary behaviours: a systematic review (the SPOTLIGHT project).

    Hélène Charreire;J. D. Mackenbach;M. Ouasti;J. Lakerveld

  • Built environmental characteristics and diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    J Lakerveld;NR den Braver;F Rutters;LJ Schoonmade

Frequent Co-Authors

Johannes Brug
Johannes Brug Utrecht University
Harry Rutter
Harry Rutter University of Bath
Giel Nijpels
Giel Nijpels VU University Medical Center
Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij
Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij Ghent University
Greet Cardon
Greet Cardon Ghent University
Martin McKee
Martin McKee London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Nanna Lien
Nanna Lien University of Oslo
Karien Stronks
Karien Stronks University of Amsterdam
Maurits W. van Tulder
Maurits W. van Tulder Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Ulf Ekelund
Ulf Ekelund Norwegian School of Sport Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens access to a range of online degrees and rewarding career options. Many institutions now offer accredited programs designed to prepare students for professional roles in counseling, therapy, psychology, and social work.

If you are considering a career in mental health services, look into cacrep-accredited counseling programs. These programs are recognized for meeting high educational standards and can lead to licensure in counseling.

Those interested in supporting families and couples can explore online marriage and family therapy graduate programs, which focus on relational dynamics and therapy skills.

For a broader foundation in behavioral science, an accredited online psychology degree can provide versatile knowledge that applies to various pathways—such as research, counseling, or business.

Social work remains essential in community wellbeing; pursuing online msw options can equip you for impactful roles in public health, public policy, and nonprofit sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Jeroen Lakerveld

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles