World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
37
Citations
6359
World Ranking
1966
National Ranking
64

Uwe Cantner publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Uwe Cantner sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 281 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

Uwe Cantner D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Uwe Cantner sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Overview

Uwe Cantner is affiliated with Friedrich Schiller University Jena in Germany and specializes in research spanning economics, econometrics, finance, business, management, and accounting. Their work frequently engages with multiple subfields including economics and econometrics, management of technology and innovation, strategy and management, accounting, as well as sociology and political science.

The research topics addressed by Uwe Cantner notably include entrepreneurship studies and influences, firm innovation and growth, private equity and venture capital, innovation policy and R&D, innovation and knowledge management, sustainability and climate change governance, and global trade and economics.

Selected recent publications illustrate the diversity and scope of their research interests. These include:

  • "The dynamics of entrepreneurial ecosystems: an empirical investigation" (2022) published in R and D Management
  • "Innovation for the German energy transition - Insights from an expert survey" (2020) published in Energy Policy
  • "Entrepreneurial ecosystems: a dynamic lifecycle model" (2020) published in Small Business Economics
  • "Economic diversification and human development in Europe" (2020) published in Eurasian Economic Review
  • "Outcomes of science-industry collaboration: factors and interdependencies" (2023) published in The Journal of Technology Transfer

Their publication record also includes a book titled Sozialpolitik im vereinten Deutschland II., published by Duncker & Humblot in 2022.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Uwe Cantner are:

  • Martin Kalthaus (5 joint publications)
  • Matthias Menter (4 joint publications)
  • Friederike Welter (4 joint publications)
  • Wolfgang Gerstlberger (4 joint publications)
  • Irene Bertschek (3 joint publications)

Their work has appeared predominantly in venues such as:

  • Journal of Evolutionary Economics (4 publications)
  • Industrial and Corporate Change (3 publications)
  • Wirtschaftsdienst (3 publications)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (3 publications)
  • Small Business Economics (2 publications)

Best Publications

  • The network of innovators in Jena: An application of social network analysis

    Uwe Cantner;Holger Graf

  • Scientists' transition to academic entrepreneurship: Economic and psychological determinants

    Maximilian Goethner;Martin Obschonka;Rainer K. Silbereisen;Uwe Cantner;Uwe Cantner

  • Regional characteristics, opportunity perception and entrepreneurial activities

    Michael Stuetzer;Martin Obschonka;Udo Brixy;Rolf Sternberg

  • Social identity and the transition to entrepreneurship: The role of group identification with workplace peers

    Martin Obschonka;Maximilian Goethner;Rainer K. Silbereisen;Uwe Cantner;Uwe Cantner

  • CLASSIFYING TECHNOLOGY POLICY FROM AN EVOLUTIONARY PERSPECTIVE

    Uwe Cantner;Andreas Pyka

  • Entrepreneurial ecosystems: a dynamic lifecycle model

    Uwe Cantner;James A. Cunningham;Erik E. Lehmann;Matthias Menter

  • Entrepreneurial Self-Identity: Predictors and Effects Within the Theory of Planned Behavior Framework

    Martin Obschonka;Martin Obschonka;Rainer K. Silbereisen;Uwe Cantner;Uwe Cantner;Maximilian Goethner

  • Innovator networks and regional knowledge base

    Uwe Cantner;Andreas Meder;Anne L.J. ter Wal

  • Technological proximity and the choice of cooperation partner

    Uwe Cantner;Andreas Meder

  • Picking the winner? Empirical evidence on the targeting of R&D subsidies to start-ups

    Uwe Cantner;Uwe Cantner;Sarah Kösters

  • Inventor Networks in Renewable Energies: The Influence of the Policy Mix in Germany

    Uwe Cantner;Holger Graf;Johannes Herrmann;Martin Kalthaus

  • Produktivitäts- und Effizienzanalyse : der nichtparametrische Ansatz

    Uwe Cantner;Jens Krüger;Horst Hanusch

  • The effects of knowledge management on innovative success – An empirical analysis of German firms

    Uwe Cantner;Uwe Cantner;Kristin Joel;Tobias Schmidt

  • The use of knowledge management by German innovators

    Uwe Cantner;Kristin Joel;Tobias Schmidt

  • Absorbing Technological Spillovers: Simulations in an Evolutionary Framework

    Uwe Cantner;Andreas Pyka

  • Networks and innovation: the role of social assets in explaining firms' innovative capacity

    Uwe Cantner;Elisa Conti;Andreas Meder

  • Total factor productivity, the east Asian miracle, and the world production frontier

    Jens J. Kaüger;Uwe Cantner;Horst Hanusch

  • Firm survival in the German automobile industry

    Uwe Cantner;Kristina Dreßler;Jens J. Krüger

  • EFI – Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation: Gutachten zu Forschung, Innovation und technologischer Leistungsfähigkeit Deutschlands 2018

    Uschi Backes-Gellner;Christoph Böhringer;Uwe Cantner;Dietmar Harhoff

  • Soft skills, hard skills, and individual innovativeness

    Achmad Fajar Hendarman;Achmad Fajar Hendarman;Uwe Cantner;Uwe Cantner

  • Change, Transformation and Development

    Stanley J. Metcalfe;Uwe Cantner

  • Classifying Technology Policy from an Evolutionary Perspective

    Andreas Pyka;Uwe Cantner

Frequent Co-Authors

Andreas Pyka
Andreas Pyka University of Hohenheim
Martin Obschonka
Martin Obschonka Queensland University of Technology
Rainer K. Silbereisen
Rainer K. Silbereisen Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Christoph Böhringer
Christoph Böhringer Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg
Dietmar Harhoff
Dietmar Harhoff Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition
Ipsita Roy
Ipsita Roy University of Sheffield
Werner Güth
Werner Güth Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
Rolf Sternberg
Rolf Sternberg University of Hannover
Steven Klepper
Steven Klepper Carnegie Mellon University
Dennis C. Mueller
Dennis C. Mueller University of Vienna

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The landscape of business and management education in the USA is rapidly evolving, with flexible options catering to a variety of career ambitions. Many students now turn to online degrees for convenience, affordability, and access to top programs nationwide. Exploring the best online universities can be a great starting point to ensure your chosen program meets high academic standards and is recognized by employers.

For those aspiring to leadership positions, pursuing a PhD in organizational leadership can unlock opportunities in consulting, higher education, and executive roles. Specialized management degrees are also gaining popularity. For example, an construction management degree can prepare graduates for fast-paced roles in project oversight and development.

The healthcare sector offers significant leadership opportunities as well. Enrolling in online programs for healthcare administration provides the skills needed to manage healthcare facilities, services, and staff. Overall, online programs offer diverse and accessible ways to accelerate your career in business and management.

Best Scientists Citing Uwe Cantner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles