World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Psychology
Poland
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
70
Citations
21610
World Ranking
2250
National Ranking
3

Aleksandra Luszczynska publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aleksandra Luszczynska sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 247 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Aleksandra Luszczynska D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aleksandra Luszczynska sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in Poland Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Psychology in Poland Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Psychology in Poland Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Psychology in Poland Leader Award

Overview

Aleksandra Luszczynska is affiliated with the University of Social Sciences and Humanities in Poland. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine, Psychology, and Health Professions, contributing substantially to these scientific areas.

The subfields in which they conduct research include General Health Professions, Applied Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology, and Sociology and Political Science. This diverse expertise reflects a multidisciplinary approach to health sciences.

The main topics covered in their work consist of Behavioral Health and Interventions, Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet, Health Policy Implementation Science, Physical Activity and Health, Community Health and Development, Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology, and Digital Mental Health Interventions.

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Aleksandra Luszczynska are:

  • Advancing the evidence base for public policies impacting on dietary behaviour, physical activity and sedentary behaviour in Europe: The Policy Evaluation Network promoting a multidisciplinary approach (2020, Food Policy)
  • Policy implementation and priorities to create healthy food environments using the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI): A pooled level analysis across eleven European countries (2022, The Lancet Regional Health - Europe)
  • Associations between self-efficacy and sedentary behaviour: a meta-analysis (2020, Psychology and Health)
  • Meta-review of implementation determinants for policies promoting healthy diet and physically active lifestyle: application of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (2022, Implementation Science)
  • The trajectory of COVID-19 pandemic and handwashing adherence: findings from 14 countries (2021, BMC Public Health)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Aleksandra Luszczynska include:

  • Anna Banik
  • Zofia Szczuka
  • Ewa Kuliś
  • Nina Knoll
  • Nanna Lien

The venues where Luszczynska most frequently publishes are:

  • Obesity Reviews
  • European Journal of Public Health
  • Psychology and Health
  • BMC Public Health
  • Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Best Publications

  • The general self-efficacy scale: multicultural validation studies.

    Aleksandra Luszczynska;Urte Scholz;Ralf Schwarzer

  • General self‐efficacy in various domains of human functioning: Evidence from five countries

    Aleksandra Luszczynska;Benicio Gutiérrez‐Doña;Ralf Schwarzer

  • Mechanisms of health behavior change in persons with chronic illness or disability: the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA).

    Ralf Schwarzer;Sonia Lippke;Aleksandra Luszczynska

  • Social cognitive theory

    Aleksandra Luszczynska;Ralf Karl Schwarzer

  • Implementation intention and action planning interventions in health contexts: state of the research and proposals for the way forward.

    Martin S. Hagger;Aleksandra Luszczynska;Aleksandra Luszczynska

  • A meta-analysis of the relationship between job burnout and secondary traumatic stress among workers with indirect exposure to trauma.

    Roman Cieslak;Kotaro Shoji;Allison Douglas;Erin Melville

  • Planning and Self-Efficacy in the Adoption and Maintenance of Breast Self-Examination: A Longitudinal Study on Self-Regulatory Cognitions

    Aleksandra Luszczynska;Ralf Schwarzer

  • How to overcome health-compromising behaviors: The health action process approach

    Ralf Schwarzer;Aleksandra Luszczynska

  • Adoption and maintenance of four health behaviors: Theory-guided longitudinal studies on dental flossing, seat belt use, dietary behavior, and physical activity

    Ralf Schwarzer;Benjamin Schüz;Jochen P. Ziegelmann;Sonia Lippke

  • Associations between job burnout and self-efficacy: a meta-analysis.

    Kotaro Shoji;Roman Cieslak;Ewelina Smoktunowicz;Anna Rogala

  • Self-Efficacy and Health-Related Outcomes of Collective Trauma A Systematic Review

    Aleksandra Luszczynska;Charles C. Benight;Roman Cieslak

  • Social-cognitive predictors of physical exercise adherence: Three longitudinal studies in rehabilitation.

    Ralf Schwarzer;Aleksandra Luszczynska;Jochen P. Ziegelmann;Urte Scholz

  • Improving fruit and vegetable consumption: a self-efficacy intervention compared with a combined self-efficacy and planning intervention

    Aleksandra Luszczynska;Maciej Tryburcy;Ralf Schwarzer

  • Meaning in life and physical health: systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Katarzyna Czekierda;Anna Banik;Crystal L. Park;Aleksandra Luszczynska

  • Planning to break unwanted habits: habit strength moderates implementation intention effects on behaviour change.

    Thomas L. Webb;Paschal Sheeran;Aleksandra Luszczynska

  • Multidimensional health locus of control: comments on the construct and its measurement.

    Aleksandra Luszczynska;Ralf Schwarzer

  • Planning to lose weight: randomized controlled trial of an implementation intention prompt to enhance weight reduction among overweight and obese women.

    Aleksandra Luszczynska;Anna Sobczyk;Charles Abraham

  • Stressful Life Events

    Ralf Schwarzer;Aleksandra Luszczynska

  • Self-efficacy as a moderator of the planning–behaviour relationship in interventions designed to promote physical activity

    Aleksandra Luszczynska;Ralf Schwarzer;Sonia Lippke;Magda Mazurkiewicz

  • Measuring one component of dispositional self-regulation: attention control in goal pursuit

    Aleksandra Luszczynska;Manfred Diehl;Benicio Gutiérrez-Doña;Patrik Kuusinen

Frequent Co-Authors

Urte Scholz
Urte Scholz University of Zurich
Nina Knoll
Nina Knoll Freie Universität Berlin
Ralf Schwarzer
Ralf Schwarzer Freie Universität Berlin
Charles C. Benight
Charles C. Benight University of Colorado Colorado Springs
Sonia Lippke
Sonia Lippke Jacobs University
John de Wit
John de Wit Utrecht University
Konstadina Griva
Konstadina Griva Nanyang Technological University
Tracey A. Revenson
Tracey A. Revenson City University of New York
Mariët Hagedoorn
Mariët Hagedoorn University Medical Center Groningen
Martin S. Hagger
Martin S. Hagger University of California, Merced

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens up a variety of online degree options and career pathways. Many students are interested in programs that offer flexibility, speed, or specific career-focused training. Online social work programs, for example, are a popular choice for those looking to complement their psychology backgrounds with skills geared toward community support and advocacy.

For individuals seeking advanced credentials, the easiest online social work doctorate degrees in the US provide an accessible route to leadership or academic roles. Alternatively, those aiming for clinical or practitioner positions may consider the easiest online social work master's programs in America.

If you are looking for broader options, you can explore the easiest online social work programs in the US at different degree levels. Time-conscious learners may also want to check out the fastest online social work programs in Arizona for accelerated learning.

These online programs can streamline the pathway to a career in social work, counseling, or related mental health fields, making them a valuable consideration for those passionate about helping others.

Best Scientists Citing Aleksandra Luszczynska

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles