World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jochen P. Ziegelmann

Jochen P. Ziegelmann

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 44 6989 6517 333 327 89 7521

Jochen P. Ziegelmann publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jochen P. Ziegelmann between 1999 and 2019, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jochen P. Ziegelmann published across 21 years, from 1999 to 2019, averaging 5.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2011. 2 of the 111 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2019. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2011. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 4 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 2 publications
1999 2019

111 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jochen P. Ziegelmann: publications per year, 1999 to 2019
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 0
2001 0
2002 2
2003 1
2004 4
2005 3
2006 8
2007 6
2008 8
2009 6
2010 10
2011 13
2012 11
2013 5
2014 5
2015 7
2016 6
2017 13
2018 0
2019 2
Total 111
Download as CSV

Jochen P. Ziegelmann publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jochen P. Ziegelmann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 89 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 89
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jochen P. Ziegelmann D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jochen P. Ziegelmann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 44
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jochen P. Ziegelmann is affiliated with Freie Universität Berlin in Germany. Their academic contributions include collaboration with multiple frequent co-authors:

  • Julia Simonson
  • Claudia Vogel
  • Clemens Tesch-Römer

Ziegelmann has contributed to book publications, notably with Empirische Studien zum bürgerschaftlichen Engagement. One such publication is titled Zentrale Ergebnisse des Deutschen Freiwilligensurveys 2019, published in 2021, which has received 58 citations.

Their research interests and scientific output span various fields and subfields, although specific disciplines or primary topics have not been enumerated in the available data. The frequent collaboration with certain co-authors suggests engagement in fields related to social sciences and civic engagement.

No specific recent papers or frequent publication venues are listed, indicating either a focus on collaborative or book-based scholarly contributions. Likewise, no awards have been documented.

Best Publications

  • Adoption and maintenance of four health behaviors: Theory-guided longitudinal studies on dental flossing, seat belt use, dietary behavior, and physical activity

    Ralf Schwarzer;Benjamin Schüz;Jochen P. Ziegelmann;Sonia Lippke

  • Social-cognitive predictors of physical exercise adherence: Three longitudinal studies in rehabilitation.

    Ralf Schwarzer;Aleksandra Luszczynska;Jochen P. Ziegelmann;Urte Scholz

  • Adoption and maintenance of physical activity: Planning interventions in young, middle-aged, and older adults

    Jochen P Ziegelmann;Sonia Lippke;Ralf Schwarzer

  • Theory‐Based Health Behavior Change: Developing, Testing, and Applying Theories for Evidence‐Based Interventions

    Sonia Lippke;Jochen P. Ziegelmann

  • How do negative self-perceptions of aging become a self-fulfilling prophecy?

    Susanne Wurm;Lisa M. Warner;Jochen P. Ziegelmann;Julia K. Wolff

  • Future Time Perspective and Health Behaviors: Temporal Framing of Self-Regulatory Processes in Physical Exercise and Dietary Behaviors

    Paul Gellert;Jochen P. Ziegelmann;Sonia Lippke;Ralf Schwarzer

  • Beyond behavioural intentions: planning mediates between intentions and physical activity.

    Urte Scholz;Benjamin Schüz;Jochen P. Ziegelmann;Sonia Lippke

  • Stage-specific adoption and maintenance of physical activity: testing a three-stage model

    Sonia Lippke;Jochen P. Ziegelmann;Ralf Schwarzer

  • Behavioral Intentions and Action Plans Promote Physical Exercise: A Longitudinal Study with Orthopedic Rehabilitation Patients

    Sonia Lippke;Jochen P. Ziegelmann;Ralf Schwarzer

  • Initiation and Maintenance of Physical Exercise: Stage-Specific Effects of a Planning Intervention

    Sonia Lippke;Jochen P. Ziegelmann;Ralf Schwarzer

  • Self-efficacy moderates the mediation of intentions into behavior via plans.

    Sonia Lippke;Amelie U. Wiedemann;Jochen P. Ziegelmann;Tabea Reuter

  • What do targeting positive views on ageing add to a physical activity intervention in older adults? Results from a randomised controlled trial

    Julia K. Wolff;Lisa M. Warner;Jochen P. Ziegelmann;Susanne Wurm

  • Validity of stage assessment in the adoption and maintenance of physical activity and fruit and vegetable consumption.

    Sonia Lippke;Jochen P. Ziegelmann;Ralf Schwarzer;Wayne F. Velicer

  • Medication beliefs predict medication adherence in older adults with multiple illnesses

    Benjamin Schüz;Christopher Marx;Susanne Wurm;Lisa M. Warner

  • Quality of life and emotional responses in cadaver and living related renal transplant recipients

    Konstadina Griva;Jochen P. Ziegelmann;Derek Thompson;Dakshina Jayasena

  • On the assessment and analysis of variables in the health action process approach conducting an investigation

    Ralf Schwarzer;Falco F. Sniehotta;Sonia Lippke;Aleksandra Luszczynska

  • Physical activity intervention in older adults: does a participating partner make a difference?

    Paul Gellert;Jochen P. Ziegelmann;Lisa M. Warner;Ralf Schwarzer

  • Are goal intentions or implementation intentions better predictors of health behavior? A longitudinal study in orthopedic rehabilitation.

    Jochen P. Ziegelmann;Aleksandra Luszczynska;Sonia Lippke;Ralf Schwarzer

  • The Transplant Effects Questionnaire (TxEQ): The development of a questionnaire for assessing the multidimensional outcome of organ transplantation — example of end stage renal disease (ESRD)

    J. P. Ziegelmann;K. Griva;M. Hankins;M. Harrison

  • Maintaining autonomy despite multimorbidity: self-efficacy and the two faces of social support

    Lisa M. Warner;Jochen P. Ziegelmann;Benjamin Schüz;Susanne Wurm

  • Testing Stage-Specific Effects of a Stage-Matched Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial Targeting Physical Exercise and Its Predictors

    Sonia Lippke;Ralf Schwarzer;Jochen P. Ziegelmann;Urte Scholz

  • Beyond behavioural intentions: Planning mediates between intentions and physical activity

    U Scholz;Bec Schuez;JP Ziegelmann;S Lippke

Frequent Co-Authors

Sonia Lippke
Sonia Lippke Jacobs University
Ralf Schwarzer
Ralf Schwarzer Freie Universität Berlin
Lisa M. Warner
Lisa M. Warner Boston College
Benjamin Schüz
Benjamin Schüz University of Bremen
Urte Scholz
Urte Scholz University of Zurich
Aleksandra Luszczynska
Aleksandra Luszczynska University of Social Sciences and Humanities
Nina Knoll
Nina Knoll Freie Universität Berlin
Konstadina Griva
Konstadina Griva Nanyang Technological University
Stanton Newman
Stanton Newman City, University of London
Andrew Davenport
Andrew Davenport University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology can open doors to a variety of rewarding careers, including counseling, therapy, and social work. For those looking to make a direct impact in communities, pursuing a degree in social work is a practical next step. Many institutions across the country now offer affordable, accredited programs both on-campus and online.

If cost is a concern, you can explore the most affordable social work degree programs in Columbus or consider options in Texas, such as the most affordable social work degree programs in Denton. Students in Florida are also in luck, with several affordable social work degrees in Florida available.

For those interested in studying in Hawaii, you can research the cheapest social work programs in Honolulu. These flexible and budget-friendly programs can help you gain the skills needed for a fulfilling career in social services, mental health, and community outreach.

By choosing the right online or on-campus degree, you can tailor your qualifications to suit your career goals—whether in clinical settings, schools, or nonprofit organizations.

Best Scientists Citing Jochen P. Ziegelmann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles