World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
89
Citations
27103
World Ranking
12764
National Ranking
1199

Stanton Newman publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stanton Newman sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 498 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Stanton Newman D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stanton Newman sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stanton Newman is affiliated with City, University of London in the United Kingdom and has made significant contributions to the field of medicine, particularly in areas intersecting with healthcare management and patient care.

Their research spans several specialized subfields including general health professions, psychiatry and mental health, epidemiology, hematology, and public health, environmental and occupational health.

The main topics addressed in their work include:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
  • Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
  • Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research
  • Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
  • Chronic Disease Management Strategies

Stanton Newman's frequent collaborators consist of:

  • Shashivadan P. Hirani (14 publications)
  • Konstadina Griva (8 publications)
  • Stefano Brini (6 publications)
  • Kathleen Mulligan (6 publications)
  • Lucy R. Wedderburn (6 publications)

Their research has been published in various venues, with multiple works appearing in the following journals and outlets:

  • British Journal of Health Psychology (2 publications)
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (2 publications)
  • Lara D. Veeken (2 publications)
  • Age and Ageing (1 publication)
  • Health Technology Assessment (1 publication)

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Stanton Newman include:

  • The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of assistive technology and telecare for independent living in dementia: a randomised controlled trial, 2020, Age and Ageing
  • Assistive technology and telecare to maintain independent living at home for people with dementia: the ATTILA RCT, 2021, Health Technology Assessment
  • Randomised open-label trial comparing intravenous iron and an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent versus oral iron to treat preoperative anaemia in cardiac surgery (INITIATE trial), 2022, British Journal of Anaesthesia
  • Associations between health literacy and health care utilization and mortality in patients with coexisting diabetes and end-stage renal disease: A prospective cohort study, 2020, British Journal of Health Psychology
  • Placing assistive technology and telecare in everyday practices of people with dementia and their caregivers: findings from an embedded ethnography of a national dementia trial, 2021, BMC Geriatrics

Their body of work primarily addresses clinical challenges such as dementia support through assistive technologies, anemia management in surgical settings, and health literacy impacts on complex chronic disease populations. The integration of technology and patient-centered care features prominently, reflecting interdisciplinary approaches within clinical and public health contexts.

Best Publications

  • Self-management interventions for chronic illness

    Stanton Newman;Liz Steed;Kathleen Mulligan

  • THE IMPACT OF MICROEMBOLI DURING CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS ON NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL FUNCTIONING

    W Pugsley;L Klinger;C Paschalis;T Treasure

  • Postoperative cognitive dysfunction after noncardiac surgery: a systematic review.

    Stanton Newman;Jan Stygall;Shashivadan Hirani;Shahzad Shaefi

  • Statement of consensus on assessment of neurobehavioral outcomes after cardiac surgery

    John M. Murkin;Stanton P. Newman;David A. Stump;James A. Blumenthal

  • Effect of telehealth on use of secondary care and mortality: findings from the Whole System Demonstrator cluster randomised trial

    Adam Steventon;Martin Bardsley;John Billings;Jennifer Dixon

  • Exploring barriers to participation and adoption of telehealth and telecare within the Whole System Demonstrator trial: A qualitative study

    Caroline Sanders;Anne Rogers;Robert Bowen;Peter Bower

  • The cerebral effects of ascent to high altitudes

    Mark H Wilson;Stanton Newman;Chris H Imray

  • Do religious/spiritual coping strategies affect illness adjustment in patients with cancer? A systematic review of the literature.

    Ingela C. Thuné-Boyle;Jan A. Stygall;Jan A. Stygall;Mohammed R. Keshtgar;Stanton P. Newman

  • Cost effectiveness of telehealth for patients with long term conditions (Whole Systems Demonstrator telehealth questionnaire study): nested economic evaluation in a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial

    Catherine Henderson;Martin Knapp;Martin Knapp;José Luis Fernández;Jennifer Beecham

  • A systematic review of psychosocial outcomes following education, self-management and psychological interventions in diabetes mellitus.

    Liz Steed;Debbey Cooke;Stanton Newman

  • Patient expectations: what do primary care patients want from the GP and how far does meeting expectations affect patient satisfaction?

    Susan Williams;John Weinman;Jeremy Dale;Stanton Newman

  • Improving patients' communication with doctors: a systematic review of intervention studies.

    Jane Harrington;Lorraine M Noble;Stanton P Newman

  • Illness perceptions and self efficacy beliefs in adolescents and young adults with insulin dependent diabetes mellitus

    Konstadina Griva;Lynn B. Myers;Stanton Newman

  • Psychosocial interventions for caregivers of people with dementia: a systematic review.

    D. D. Cooke;L. McNally;K. T. Mulligan;M. J. G. Harrison

  • Cerebral consequences of cardiopulmonary bypass.

    PeterL.C. Smith;StantonP. Newman;PeterJ. Ell;Tom Treasure

  • Cambridge handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine

    Susan Ayers;Andrew Baum;Chris McManus;Stanton Newman

  • Self-management support interventions to reduce health care utilisation without compromising outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Maria Panagioti;Gerry Richardson;Nicola Small;Elizabeth Murray

  • Cognitive impairment and 7-year mortality in dialysis patients

    Konstadina Griva;Jan Stygall;Matthew Hankins;Andrew Davenport

  • Cerebral emboli and cognitive outcome after cardiac surgery

    David A. Stump;Anne T. Rogers;Anne T. Rogers;John W. Hammon;John W. Hammon;Stanton P. Newman;Stanton P. Newman

  • Effect of telehealth on quality of life and psychological outcomes over 12 months (Whole Systems Demonstrator telehealth questionnaire study): nested study of patient reported outcomes in a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial

    Martin Cartwright;Shashivadan P Hirani;Lorna Rixon;Michelle Beynon

Frequent Co-Authors

Konstadina Griva
Konstadina Griva Nanyang Technological University
Martin Knapp
Martin Knapp London School of Economics and Political Science
John Weinman
John Weinman King's College London
Susan Ayers
Susan Ayers City, University of London
Kenneth A. Wallston
Kenneth A. Wallston Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Tom Treasure
Tom Treasure University College London
Andrew Baum
Andrew Baum University of Pittsburgh
Ray Fitzpatrick
Ray Fitzpatrick University of Oxford
Peter Bower
Peter Bower University of Manchester
Anne Rogers
Anne Rogers University of Southampton

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a future in healthcare, there are now flexible online degree pathways that can help you advance your career without disrupting your life. For registered nurses looking to move up, exploring the best online rn to bsn programs without clinical requirements provides an efficient route to gain advanced credentials while maintaining work-life balance.

For those aspiring to top leadership or clinical roles, there are also innovative options for doctoral programs. Many students seek the shortest dnp programs available online to fast-track their progress. Meanwhile, individuals who want a streamlined academic experience should consider online dnp programs without dissertation requirements, allowing them to focus more on real-world application of their knowledge.

If you’re at the start of your nursing career, understanding what is the fastest way to become an lpn can be a crucial first step. Fast-track LPN programs online offer a direct path to employment, giving you the opportunity to gain experience and pursue further education at your own pace.

Best Scientists Citing Stanton Newman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles