World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 109 5746 5394 561 534 611 46838

Peter Bower publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter Bower between 1992 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter Bower published across 35 years, from 1992 to 2026, averaging 21.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 80 publications in 2014. 39 of the 751 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 80. Peak 80 publications in 2014. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 13 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 14 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 20 publications 2008: 18 publications 2009: 18 publications 2010: 20 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 23 publications 2013: 62 publications 2014: 80 publications 2015: 57 publications 2016: 36 publications 2017: 33 publications 2018: 33 publications 2019: 30 publications 2020: 40 publications 2021: 31 publications 2022: 32 publications 2023: 44 publications 2024: 32 publications 2025: 38 publications 2026: 1 publication
1992 2026

751 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter Bower: publications per year, 1992 to 2026
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 0
1994 1
1995 1
1996 0
1997 4
1998 6
1999 4
2000 13
2001 3
2002 14
2003 13
2004 3
2005 11
2006 14
2007 20
2008 18
2009 18
2010 20
2011 15
2012 23
2013 62
2014 80
2015 57
2016 36
2017 33
2018 33
2019 30
2020 40
2021 31
2022 32
2023 44
2024 32
2025 38
2026 1
Total 751
Download as CSV

Peter Bower publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Bower sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 601–620 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 611 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396 611
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter Bower D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Bower sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 108–109 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 109 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445 109
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Peter Bower is affiliated with the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on health professions and medicine, with extensive work in the subfields of general health professions, public health, environmental and occupational health, economics and econometrics, endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism, and epidemiology.

Their main topics of research include health systems, economic evaluations, quality of life; health policy implementation science; primary care and health outcomes; chronic disease management strategies; mental health and patient involvement; ethics in clinical research; and diabetes management and education.

Peter Bower has published numerous papers in various journals. Some recent publications include:

  • Factors Associated With Burnout and Stress in Trainee Physicians, 2020, JAMA Network Open
  • Preventable medication harm across health care settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis, 2020, BMC Medicine
  • Why do patients take part in research? An overview of systematic reviews of psychosocial barriers and facilitators, 2020, Trials
  • Are there interactional differences between telephone and face-to-face psychological therapy? A systematic review of comparative studies, 2020, Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Routine provision of feedback from patient-reported outcome measurements to healthcare providers and patients in clinical practice, 2021, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Frequent co-authors in their research include Evangelos Kontopantelis, Shaun Treweek, Penny Bee, Matt Sutton, and Katie Gillies.

Peter Bower's work is often published in the following venues:

  • Trials
  • BMJ Open
  • BMC Medicine
  • British Journal of General Practice
  • Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Best Publications

  • Patient-centredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature.

    Nicola Mead;Peter Bower

  • Collaborative care for depression: a cumulative meta-analysis and review of longer-term outcomes.

    Simon Gilbody;Peter Bower;Janine Fletcher;David Richards

  • Controlled Interventions to Reduce Burnout in Physicians A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Maria Panagioti;Efharis Panagopoulou;Peter Bower;George Lewith

  • Collaborative care for depression and anxiety problems

    Janine Archer;Peter Bower;Simon Gilbody;Karina Lovell

  • Stepped care in psychological therapies: Access, effectiveness and efficiency. Narrative literature review.

    Peter Bower;Simon Gilbody

  • Patient-centred consultations and outcomes in primary care: a review of the literature.

    Nicola Mead;Peter Bower

  • Prevalence, severity, and nature of preventable patient harm across medical care settings: systematic review and meta-analysis

    Maria Panagioti;Kanza Khan;Richard N Keers;Aseel Abuzour

  • Instruments for exploring organizational culture: A review of the literature

    Tobias Jung;Tim Scott;Huw T. O. Davies;Peter Bower

  • What makes self-help interventions effective in the management of depressive symptoms? Meta-analysis and meta-regression.

    Judith Gellatly;Peter Bower;Sue Hennessy;David Richards

  • Exploring barriers to participation and adoption of telehealth and telecare within the Whole System Demonstrator trial: A qualitative study

    Caroline Sanders;Anne Rogers;Robert Bowen;Peter Bower

  • Collaborative care for depression in primary care. Making sense of a complex intervention: systematic review and meta-regression

    Peter Bower;Simon Gilbody;David Richards;Janine Fletcher

  • The effectiveness and cost effectiveness of a national lay-led self care support programme for patients with long-term conditions: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial

    Anne Kennedy;David Reeves;Peter Bower;Victoria Lee

  • Computerised cognitive behaviour therapy (cCBT) as treatment for depression in primary care (REEACT trial): large scale pragmatic randomised controlled trial

    Simon Gilbody;Elizabeth Littlewood;Catherine Hewitt;Gwen Brierley

  • Cost effectiveness of telehealth for patients with long term conditions (Whole Systems Demonstrator telehealth questionnaire study): nested economic evaluation in a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial

    Catherine Henderson;Martin Knapp;Martin Knapp;José Luis Fernández;Jennifer Beecham

  • Interventions for common perinatal mental disorders in women in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Atif Rahman;Jane Rosamond Woodward Fisher;Peter Bower;Stanley Luchters

  • Randomised controlled trial of non-directive counselling, cognitive-behaviour therapy, and usual general practitioner care for patients with depression. II: cost effectiveness.

    Peter Bower;Sarah Byford;Bonnie Sibbald;Elaine Ward

  • Randomised controlled trial of non-directive counselling, cognitive-behaviour therapy and usual general practitioner care in the management of depression as well as mixed anxiety and depression in primary care

    M King;B Sibbald;E Ward;P Bower

  • Support for self care for patients with chronic disease

    Anne Kennedy;Anne Rogers;Peter Bower

  • Collaborative care for depression : A cumulative meta-analysis and review of longer-term outcomes. Commentary

    Wayne Katon;Jürgen Unützer;Simon Gilbody;Peter Bower

  • Patient Health Questionnaire

    C Dowrick;C Chew-Graham;K Lovell;J Lamb

Frequent Co-Authors

Linda Gask
Linda Gask University of Manchester
Simon Gilbody
Simon Gilbody University of York
Anne Rogers
Anne Rogers University of Southampton
Michael Barkham
Michael Barkham University of Sheffield
Anne Kennedy
Anne Kennedy University of Southampton
Peter A. Coventry
Peter A. Coventry University of York
David Richards
David Richards University of Bristol
Maria Panagioti
Maria Panagioti University of Manchester
Martin Roland
Martin Roland University of Cambridge
Ricardo Araya
Ricardo Araya King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative or supplementary career paths in healthcare can open up numerous opportunities beyond traditional medical school. For those interested in healthcare leadership, there are affordable online mha programs that offer flexibility and cost-effective options to develop essential administrative skills.

If advanced clinical roles are your goal, you might consider the cheapest online dnp programs, which train nurse practitioners and clinical leaders at a high level while accommodating working professionals.

Pharmacy is another respected field in medicine. Comparing online pharmacy school cost can help you find a program that matches your budget while still meeting strict accreditation standards.

For those seeking a path at the intersection of healthcare and technology, accredited healthcare informatics degree programs provide specialized skills for managing health data and driving innovation in patient care.

Each of these online degrees can serve as a launching pad for meaningful careers in healthcare, whether you’re transitioning fields or looking to advance your education alongside work commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Bower

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles