World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Psychology
UK
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
95
Citations
31083
World Ranking
777
National Ranking
96

Michael Barkham publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Barkham sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 370 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Michael Barkham D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Barkham sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in United Kingdom Leader Award

Overview

Michael Barkham is affiliated with the University of Sheffield in the United Kingdom. Their research is focused within the field of psychology, with a significant concentration in clinical psychology.

Their work spans several subfields of study including:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • General Health Professions
  • Applied Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

The main topics explored in their research include:

  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Schizophrenia Research and Treatment
  • Mental Health and Patient Involvement

Barkham has contributed frequently to several publication venues, notably:

  • Psychotherapy Research
  • Counselling and Psychotherapy Research
  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
  • Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research

Among their recent papers are:

  • Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM) and Feedback: Research Review and Recommendations, 2023, Psychotherapy Research
  • Prevalence and risk factors for mental health problems in university undergraduate students: A systematic review with meta-analysis, 2021, Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Stratified Care vs Stepped Care for Depression, 2021, JAMA Psychiatry
  • Mental Health During COVID-19 Lockdown in the United Kingdom, 2020, Psychosomatic Medicine
  • Are there interactional differences between telephone and face-to-face psychological therapy? A systematic review of comparative studies, 2020, Journal of Affective Disorders

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Jaime Delgadillo
  • D. H. Saxon
  • Wolfgang Lutz
  • Emma Broglia
  • Peter Bower

Best Publications

  • Towards a standardised brief outcome measure: psychometric properties and utility of the CORE-OM.

    Chris Evans;Janice Connell;Michael Barkham;Frank Margison

  • CORE: Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation

    Chris Evans;John Mellor-Clark;Frank Margison;Michael Barkham

  • Changes in undergraduate students’ psychological well‐being as they progress through university

    Bridgette Bewick;Gina Koutsopoulou;Jeremy Miles;Esther Slaa

  • Effects of treatment duration and severity of depression on the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral and psychodynamic-interpersonal psychotherapy.

    David A. Shapiro;Michael Barkham;Anne Rees;Gillian E. Hardy

  • Service profiling and outcomes benchmarking using the CORE-OM: Toward practice-based evidence in the psychological therapies.

    Michael Barkham;Frank Margison;Chris Leach;Mike Lucock

  • The IIP-32 : A short version of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems

    Michael Barkham;Gillian E. Hardy;Michael Startup

  • The contribution of reliable and clinically significant change methods to evidence-based mental health

    Chris Evans;Frank Margison;Michael Barkham

  • Prevalence and risk factors for mental health problems in university undergraduate students: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

    Elena Sheldon;Melanie Simmonds-Buckley;Claire Bone;Thomas Mascarenhas

  • Measurement and psychotherapy: Evidence-based practice and practice-based evidence.

    Frank R. Margison;Michael Barkham;Chris Evans;Graeme McGRATH

  • Computerised cognitive behaviour therapy (cCBT) as treatment for depression in primary care (REEACT trial): large scale pragmatic randomised controlled trial

    Simon Gilbody;Elizabeth Littlewood;Catherine Hewitt;Gwen Brierley

  • Measuring, monitoring and managing the psychological well-being of first year university students

    Richard Cooke;Bridgette M. Bewick;Michael Barkham;Margaret Bradley

  • Dose-effect relations and responsive regulation of treatment duration: the good enough level.

    Michael Barkham;Janice Connell;William B Stiles;Jeremy N V Miles

  • Effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural, person-centred, and psychodynamic therapies in UK primary-care routine practice: replication in a larger sample.

    William B. Stiles;Michael Barkham;John Mellor-Clark;Janice Connell

  • The CORE-10: A short measure of psychological distress for routine use in the psychological therapies

    Michael Barkham;Bridgette Bewick;Tracy Mullin;Simon Gilbody

  • Patterns of alliance development and the rupture-repair hypothesis: Are productive relationships U-shaped or V-shaped?

    William B. Stiles;Meredith J. Glick;Katerine Osatuke;Gillian E. Hardy

  • Influence of initial severity of depression on effectiveness of low intensity interventions: meta-analysis of individual patient data

    Peter Bower;Evangelos Kontopantelis;Alex Sutton;Tony Kendrick

  • Bridging evidence‐based practice and practice‐based evidence: developing a rigorous and relevant knowledge for the psychological therapies

    Michael Barkham;John Mellor-Clark

  • Methods to identify postnatal depression in primary care: an integrated evidence synthesis and value of information analysis.

    CE Hewitt;SM Gilbody;S Brealey;M Paulden

  • A systematic review, psychometric analysis and qualitative assessment of generic preference-based measures of health in mental health populations and the estimation of mapping functions from widely used specific measures.

    John Brazier;Janice Connell;Diana Papaioannou;Clara Mukuria

  • Dose-Effect Relations in Time-Limited Psychotherapy for Depression

    Michael Barkham;Anne Rees;William B. Stiles;David A. Shapiro

  • The effectiveness of web-based interventions designed to decrease alcohol consumption--a systematic review.

    Bridgette M. Bewick;Karen Trusler;Michael Barkham;Andrew J. Hill

Frequent Co-Authors

Gillian E. Hardy
Gillian E. Hardy University of Sheffield
William B. Stiles
William B. Stiles Miami University
Janice Connell
Janice Connell University of Sheffield
Peter Bower
Peter Bower University of Manchester
John Brazier
John Brazier University of Sheffield
Glenys Parry
Glenys Parry University of Sheffield
Simon Gilbody
Simon Gilbody University of York
Ricardo Araya
Ricardo Araya King's College London
Linda Gask
Linda Gask University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology opens up a wide range of career pathways, including counseling, mental health services, and social work. Many students pursue further education by enrolling in online social work programs, which often allow for flexible scheduling and more affordable tuition compared to traditional degrees.

As you consider advancing your qualifications, it’s important to explore programs that fit your budget and career goals. For example, you might look into affordable social work degrees in Minneapolis or affordable social work degrees in Mississippi for cost-effective options.

In major cities, there are also options like the cheapest social work degrees in New York City or affordable social work programs in New Jersey. Exploring these alternatives can make higher education more accessible and set you on the path to a rewarding career in mental health or social services.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Barkham

Trending Scientists