World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Bridgette M. Bewick

Bridgette M. Bewick

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 32 10781 10094 1048 1001 88 6101

Bridgette M. Bewick publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Bridgette M. Bewick between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Bridgette M. Bewick published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 4.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2019. 3 of the 104 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2019. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 2 publications
2002 2025

104 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Bridgette M. Bewick: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 1
2004 0
2005 3
2006 4
2007 0
2008 4
2009 4
2010 3
2011 2
2012 5
2013 8
2014 7
2015 6
2016 5
2017 5
2018 10
2019 12
2020 9
2021 10
2022 0
2023 2
2024 1
2025 2
Total 104
Download as CSV

Bridgette M. Bewick publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bridgette M. Bewick sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 88 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 88
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Bridgette M. Bewick D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bridgette M. Bewick sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 32
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Bridgette M. Bewick is affiliated with the University of Leeds in the United Kingdom and has contributed to research primarily within the fields of Psychology, Medicine, and Health Professions. Their work spans a range of topics related to mental health and digital interventions, with a focus on clinical and experimental psychology, as well as general and applied psychology.

Their research topics cover several areas including:

  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Schizophrenia Research and Treatment
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Pain Management and Opioid Use

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Frontiers in Public Health
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin Open
  • European Addiction Research

Bridgette M. Bewick has coauthored with several researchers multiple times, notably:

  • Alaa Abd-Alrazaq
  • Mowafa Househ
  • Mohannad Alajlani
  • Ciara Masterson
  • Sarah Kent

Several recent papers include:

  • "Effectiveness and Safety of Using Chatbots to Improve Mental Health: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," 2020, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • "Perceptions and Opinions of Patients About Mental Health Chatbots: Scoping Review," 2020, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • "Meta-analysis and Meta-regression of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Psychosis (CBTp) Across Time: The Effectiveness of CBTp has Improved for Delusions," 2020, Schizophrenia Bulletin Open
  • "Digital Intervention for Problematic Smartphone Use," 2021, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • "Negative Consequences of Substance Use in European University Students: Results from Project SNIPE," 2020, European Addiction Research

Best Publications

  • Changes in undergraduate students’ psychological well‐being as they progress through university

    Bridgette Bewick;Gina Koutsopoulou;Jeremy Miles;Esther Slaa

  • An overview of the features of chatbots in mental health: A scoping review

    Alaa A. Abd-alrazaq;Mohannad Alajlani;Ali Abdallah Alalwan;Bridgette M. Bewick

  • Measuring, monitoring and managing the psychological well-being of first year university students

    Richard Cooke;Bridgette M. Bewick;Michael Barkham;Margaret Bradley

  • The CORE-10: A short measure of psychological distress for routine use in the psychological therapies

    Michael Barkham;Bridgette Bewick;Tracy Mullin;Simon Gilbody

  • Effectiveness and Safety of Using Chatbots to Improve Mental Health: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Alaa Ali Abd-Alrazaq;Asma Rababeh;Mohannad Alajlani;Bridgette M Bewick

  • The effectiveness of web-based interventions designed to decrease alcohol consumption--a systematic review.

    Bridgette M. Bewick;Karen Trusler;Michael Barkham;Andrew J. Hill

  • Perceptions and Opinions of Patients About Mental Health Chatbots: Scoping Review

    Alaa A Abd-Alrazaq;Mohannad Alajlani;Nashva Ali;Kerstin Denecke

  • A Critical Appraisal of the Social Norms Approach as an Interventional Strategy for Health-Related Behavior and Attitude Change

    Robert C. Dempsey;John McAlaney;Bridgette M. Bewick

  • The feasibility and effectiveness of a web-based personalised feedback and social norms alcohol intervention in UK university students: a randomised control trial.

    Bridgette M. Bewick;Karen Trusler;Brendan Mulhern;Michael Barkham

  • Changes in undergraduate student alcohol consumption as they progress through university.

    Bridgette M Bewick;Brendan Mulhern;Michael Barkham;Karen Trusler

  • Children's Residential Weight-Loss Programs Can Work: A Prospective Cohort Study of Short-Term Outcomes for Overweight and Obese Children

    Paul J. Gately;Carlton B. Cooke;Julian H. Barth;Bridgette M. Bewick

  • The Young Person's CORE: Development of a brief outcome measure for young people

    Elspeth Twigg;Michael Barkham;Bridgette M. Bewick;Brendan Mulhern

  • Children's weight-loss camps: psychological benefit or jeopardy?

    L L M Walker;P J Gately;B M Bewick;A J Hill

  • The international development of the ‘Social Norms’ approach to drug education and prevention

    John McAlaney;Bridgette Bewick;Clarissa Hughes

  • Providing web-based feedback and social norms information to reduce student alcohol intake: a multisite investigation.

    Bridgette M Bewick;Robert West;Jan S Gill;Fiona O'May

  • Using electronic surveying to assess psychological distress within the UK student population: a multi-site pilot investigation

    Bridgette Maree Bewick;Jan Gill;Brendan Mulhern;Michael Barkham

  • Factors that affect the use of electronic personal health records among patients: A systematic review.

    Alaa A. Abd-alrazaq;Alaa A. Abd-alrazaq;Bridgette M. Bewick;Tracey Farragher;Peter Gardner

  • The Effectiveness of a Web-Based Personalized Feedback and Social Norms Alcohol Intervention on United Kingdom University Students: Randomized Controlled Trial

    Bridgette M Bewick;Robert M West;Michael Barkham;Brendan Mulhern

  • Illicit substance use among university students from seven European countries : a comparison of personal and perceived peer use and attitudes towards illicit substance use

    S. M. Helmer;R. T. Mikolajczyk;John McAlaney;B. Vriesacker

  • Personal and perceived peer use of and attitudes toward alcohol among university and college students in seven EU countries: Project SNIPE

    John McAlaney;Stefanie M. Helmer;Christiane Stock;Bart Vriesacker

  • A feasibility trial to examine the social norms approach for the prevention and reduction of licit and illicit drug use in European University and college students

    Claudia R Pischke;Hajo Zeeb;Guido van Hal;Bart Vriesacker

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Barkham
Michael Barkham University of Sheffield
Andrew J. Hill
Andrew J. Hill University of Leeds
Brendan Mulhern
Brendan Mulhern University of Technology Sydney
Hajo Zeeb
Hajo Zeeb Leibniz Association
Anne H. Berman
Anne H. Berman Uppsala University
Anne W. Taylor
Anne W. Taylor University of Adelaide
Frances Kay-Lambkin
Frances Kay-Lambkin University of Newcastle Australia
Daryl B. O'Connor
Daryl B. O'Connor University of Leeds
Mark Conner
Mark Conner University of Leeds
Janice Connell
Janice Connell University of Sheffield

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to a range of related online degrees and diverse career pathways. Many students with an interest in human behavior also pursue fields like counseling, education, or social work. Social work, in particular, is a popular path offering direct community impact and excellent job demand.

If you’re considering an affordable path, it’s worth exploring most affordable social work degree programs in Portland or the affordable social work degrees in San Antonio. These programs offer a cost-effective way to gain valuable skills and credentials.

Cost is a key consideration for students. For those on the West Coast, you can find cheapest social work degrees in Seattle, while those in Florida may consider affordable social work programs in Tallahassee. These affordable options support students in reaching their career goals without excessive debt.

Overall, combining psychology studies with related online degrees can greatly expand your career opportunities in the growing field of mental health and community support.

Best Scientists Citing Bridgette M. Bewick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles