World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 43 6211 5992 1721 1594 225 6894

Blair E. Carlson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Blair E. Carlson between 1986 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Blair E. Carlson published across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025, averaging 5.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2025. 33 of the 230 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2025. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 20 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 24 publications
1986 2025

230 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Blair E. Carlson: publications per year, 1986 to 2025
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 1
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 1
1996 0
1997 1
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 0
2007 3
2008 0
2009 0
2010 2
2011 11
2012 10
2013 6
2014 17
2015 18
2016 8
2017 16
2018 21
2019 18
2020 20
2021 16
2022 15
2023 12
2024 9
2025 24
Total 230
Download as CSV

Blair E. Carlson publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Blair E. Carlson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 218–227 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 225 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346 225
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Blair E. Carlson D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Blair E. Carlson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380 43
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Blair E. Carlson is affiliated with General Motors in the United States and has a research focus primarily in the field of Engineering, with a specialization in Mechanical Engineering. Their work prominently covers subfields including Aerospace Engineering, Computational Mechanics, Mechanics of Materials, and Materials Chemistry.

Carlson's scholarly output includes significant contributions to topics such as Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis, Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses, Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties, and Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties. Additional research interests focus on Non-Destructive Testing Techniques, Laser Material Processing Techniques, and Metal Forming Simulation Techniques.

Their publication record spans several prominent venues, reflecting a pattern of repeated contributions. These venues include the Journal of Manufacturing Processes, where they have authored 14 papers, the SSRN Electronic Journal with 7 publications, and the Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering and Materials Science and Engineering A, each with 5 papers. They have also published 4 times in Optics & Laser Technology.

Their frequent collaborators include Amberlee S. Haselhuhn with 17 coauthored works, Hui-Ping Wang with 16, Yongbing Li and Hassan Ghassemi-Armaki each with 15, and Jingjing Li with 14 joint publications.

Recent papers by Carlson cover a variety of topics related to their main fields of study. Noteworthy works include:

  • "Application of laser ablation in adhesive bonding of metallic materials: A review," 2020, Optics & Laser Technology
  • "A non-quadratic pressure-sensitive constitutive model under non-associated flow rule with anisotropic hardening: Modeling and validation," 2020, International Journal of Plasticity
  • "Effect of laser spot overlap ratio on surface characteristics and adhesive bonding strength of an Al alloy processed by nanosecond pulsed laser," 2021, Journal of Manufacturing Processes
  • "Understanding formation mechanisms of intermetallic compounds in dissimilar Al/steel joint processed by resistance spot welding," 2022, Journal of Manufacturing Processes
  • "Spindle-Shaped Surface Microstructure Inspired by Directional Water Collection Biosystems to Enhance Interfacial Wetting and Bonding Strength," 2021, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

Best Publications

  • Joining of dissimilar materials

    Kristian Martinsen;Kristian Martinsen;SJ Hu;B.E. Carlson

  • Numerical study of keyhole dynamics and keyhole-induced porosity formation in remote laser welding of Al alloys

    Runqi Lin;Hui-ping Wang;Fenggui Lu;Joshua Solomon

  • Effect of Tool Design and Process Parameters on Properties of Al Alloy 6016 Friction Stir Spot Welds

    W. Yuan;R.S. Mishra;S. Webb;Y.L. Chen

  • Effect of texture on the mechanical behavior of ultrafine grained magnesium alloy

    W. Yuan;R.S. Mishra;B. Carlson;R.K. Mishra

  • Analysis of Al-steel resistance spot welding process by developing a fully coupled multi-physics simulation model

    Jin Wang;Hui-Ping Wang;Fenggui Lu;Blair E. Carlson

  • Application of laser ablation in adhesive bonding of metallic materials: A review

    Junying Min;Hailang Wan;Blair E. Carlson;Jianping Lin

  • Effect of laser ablation surface treatment on performance of adhesive-bonded aluminum alloys

    Yongrong Wu;Jianping Lin;Blair E. Carlson;Peng Lu

  • Numerical simulation of resistance spot welding of Al to zinc-coated steel with improved representation of contact interactions

    Zixuan Wan;Hui-Ping Wang;Min Wang;Blair E. Carlson

  • Microstructural and mechanical evolution of Al/steel interface with Fe2Al5 growth in resistance spot welding of aluminum to steel

    Nannan Chen;Min Wang;Hui-Ping Wang;Zixuan Wan

  • Characterization of intermetallic compound at the interfaces of Al-steel resistance spot welds

    Zixuan Wan;Hui-Ping Wang;Nannan Chen;Min Wang

  • Dissimilar joining of galvanized high-strength steel to aluminum alloy in a zero-gap lap joint configuration by two-pass laser welding

    Junjie Ma;Masoud Harooni;Blair Carlson;Radovan Kovacevic

  • A non-quadratic pressure-sensitive constitutive model under non-associated flow rule with anisotropic hardening: Modeling and validation

    Yong Hou;Junying Min;Thomas B. Stoughton;Jianping Lin

  • Material flow and microstructural evolution during friction stir spot welding of AZ31 magnesium alloy

    W. Yuan;R.S. Mishra;R.S. Mishra;B. Carlson;R. Verma

  • Fracture mechanisms of Al/steel resistance spot welds in lap shear test

    Nannan Chen;Hui-Ping Wang;Blair E. Carlson;David R. Sigler

  • Evaluation of intermetallic compound layer at aluminum/steel interface joined by friction stir scribe technology

    Tianhao Wang;Tianhao Wang;Harpreet Sidhar;Rajiv S. Mishra;Yuri Hovanski

  • Real-time monitoring of laser welding of galvanized high strength steel in lap joint configuration

    Fanrong Kong;Junjie Ma;Blair Carlson;Radovan Kovacevic

  • Study of friction stir joining of thin aluminium sheets in lap joint configuration

    M. K. Yadava;R. S. Mishra;Y. L. Chen;B. Carlson

  • Friction stir blind riveting of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composite and aluminum alloy sheets

    Junying Min;Yongqiang Li;Jingjing Li;Blair E. Carlson

  • Mode I fracture along adhesively bonded sinusoidal interfaces

    Fernando A. Cordisco;Pablo D. Zavattieri;Louis G. Hector;Blair E. Carlson

  • Two-pass laser welding of galvanized high-strength dual-phase steel for a zero-gap lap joint configuration

    Junjie Ma;Fanrong Kong;Blair Carlson;Radovan Kovacevic

  • Effect of dual laser beam on dissimilar welding-brazing of aluminum to galvanized steel

    Masoud Mohammadpour;Nima Yazdian;Guang Yang;Hui-Ping Wang

  • Accurate characterization of biaxial stress-strain response of sheet metal from bulge testing

    Junying Min;Thomas B. Stoughton;John E. Carsley;Blair E. Carlson

  • Detection of defects in laser welding of AZ31B magnesium alloy in zero-gap lap joint configuration by a real-time spectroscopic analysis

    Masoud Harooni;Blair Carlson;Radovan Kovacevic

Frequent Co-Authors

Radovan Kovacevic
Radovan Kovacevic Southern Methodist University
Jianping Lin
Jianping Lin Tongji University
Junying Min
Junying Min Tongji University
Rajiv S. Mishra
Rajiv S. Mishra University of North Texas
Anil K. Sachdev
Anil K. Sachdev General Motors (United States)
Fenggui Lu
Fenggui Lu Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Zhongqin Lin
Zhongqin Lin Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Zhili Feng
Zhili Feng Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Thomas B. Stoughton
Thomas B. Stoughton General Motors (United States)
Guang-Ling Song
Guang-Ling Song Xiamen University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Engineering and Technology opens up a wide range of opportunities and flexible career options. For students wanting a quick entry into high-paying roles, there are numerous certificate programs that pay well, helping you gain practical skills in less time.

Flexibility is crucial for many learners. Parents, especially, can benefit from specialized degrees for stay at home moms that allow them to balance family responsibilities while advancing their education.

If you’re looking to upskill quickly, 4-6 week certification programs provide foundational knowledge in a short timeframe. These accelerated options are ideal for those eager to gain credentials rapidly.

For those interested in the business side of technology, the fastest finance degree pathways merge financial expertise with tech-driven industries, offering a streamlined route into competitive finance careers.

Whether you’re looking for flexibility, speed, or high-earning potential, these online pathways support a variety of life circumstances and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Blair E. Carlson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles