World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
37
Citations
7829
World Ranking
9085
National Ranking
912

Mick Cooper publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mick Cooper sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 234 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Mick Cooper D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mick Cooper sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom

Overview

Mick Cooper is affiliated with the University of Roehampton in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the field of Psychology, with a strong focus on Clinical Psychology and Social Psychology, among other subfields including Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology, and Sociology and Political Science.

Their scholarly work addresses a range of topics related to psychotherapy, child and adolescent psychosocial development, counseling techniques, relationship dynamics, supervision practices, personality disorders, and mental health research. Key topics of their research include:

  • Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Counseling Practices and Supervision
  • Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Mental Health Research Topics

Among recent publications authored or co-authored by Mick Cooper are:

  • "Humanistic counselling plus pastoral care as usual versus pastoral care as usual for the treatment of psychological distress in adolescents in UK state schools (ETHOS): a randomised controlled trial," 2021, The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health
  • "Activity preferences in psychotherapy: what do patients want and how does this relate to outcomes and alliance?," 2021, Counselling Psychology Quarterly

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Cooper include:

  • John C. Norcross
  • Gina Di Malta
  • Charlie Duncan
  • Kate Smith
  • Michael Barkham

Some of the venues where Cooper's work is regularly published are:

  • Counselling and Psychotherapy Research
  • Psychotherapy Research
  • Journal of Clinical Psychology
  • Journal of Humanistic Psychology
  • British Journal of Guidance and Counselling

Cooper's book publications include several editions of Psychology at the Heart of Social Change published by Policy Press in 2023 and work published by the American Psychological Association in 2021 entitled Personalizing psychotherapy: Assessing and accommodating patient preferences.

Recognition of Cooper's contributions includes being named a Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences in the United Kingdom.

Best Publications

  • Essential Research Findings in Counselling and Psychotherapy: The Facts are Friendly

    Mick Cooper

  • Working at Relational Depth in Counselling and Psychotherapy

    Dave Mearns;Michael Cooper

  • Pluralistic Counselling and Psychotherapy

    Mick Cooper;John McLeod

  • Effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural, person-centred and psychodynamic therapies as practised in UK National Health Service settings.

    William B Stiles;Michael Barkham;Elspeth Twigg;John Mellor-Clark

  • Existential therapies: a meta-analysis of their effects on psychological outcomes.

    Joël Vos;Meghan Craig;Mick Cooper

  • The impact of accommodating client preference in psychotherapy: A meta‐analysis

    Joshua K. Swift;Jennifer L. Callahan;Mick Cooper;Susannah R. Parkin

  • A pluralistic framework for counselling and psychotherapy: Implications for research

    Mick Cooper;John McLeod

  • The plural self : multiplicity in everyday life

    John Rowan;Mick Cooper

  • Interagency collaboration in children and young people's mental health: a systematic review of outcomes, facilitating factors and inhibiting factors

    M. Cooper;Y. Evans;J. Pybis

  • The Young Person's CORE: Development of a brief outcome measure for young people

    Elspeth Twigg;Michael Barkham;Bridgette M. Bewick;Brendan Mulhern

  • The Handbook of Person-Centred Psychotherapy and Counselling

    Mick Cooper;Maureen O'Hara;Peter Schmid;Art Bohart

  • Therapists' experiences of relational depth: a qualitative interview study

    Mick Cooper

  • Welcoming the other: actualising the humanistic ethic at the core of counselling psychology practice

    Mick Cooper

  • Counselling in UK secondary schools: A comprehensive review of audit and evaluation data

    Mick Cooper

  • Post-traumatic growth following bereavement: A systematic review of the literature.

    Christina Michael;Mick Cooper

  • School-based counselling in UK secondary schools : a review and critical evaluation

    Mick Cooper

  • Research Paper Post-traumatic growth following bereavement: A systematic review of the literature

    Unknown

  • Person-Centered and Experiential Therapies Work: A review of the research on counseling, psychotherapy and related practices

    Mick Cooper;Jeanne C. Watson;Dagmar Hölldampf

  • Person-centered therapy: A pluralistic perspective

    Mick Cooper;John McLeod

  • Randomised controlled trial of school-based humanistic counselling for emotional distress in young people: feasibility study and preliminary indications of efficacy.

    Mick Cooper;Nancy Rowland;Katherine McArthur;Susan Pattison

  • 'I-I' and 'I-me' : Transposing Buber's interpersonal attitudes to the intrapersonal plane

    Mick Cooper

  • Dialogue: Bridging Personal, Community, and Social Transformation

    Mick Cooper;Amy Chak;Flora Cornish;Alex Gillespie

Frequent Co-Authors

John C. Norcross
John C. Norcross University of Scranton
Robert Elliott
Robert Elliott University of Strathclyde
Catherine J. Harmer
Catherine J. Harmer University of Oxford
Michael Barkham
Michael Barkham University of Sheffield
Jennifer Beecham
Jennifer Beecham University of Kent
Alex McConnachie
Alex McConnachie University of Glasgow
William B. Stiles
William B. Stiles Miami University
Ray Norbury
Ray Norbury Brunel University London
Janice Connell
Janice Connell University of Sheffield

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in psychology opens up diverse career pathways. Many students choose online options for flexibility and accessibility, especially when aiming to combine studies with work or family obligations. Online psychology programs can offer coursework comparable to on-campus alternatives, with credibility strengthened by strong program rankings and faculty expertise.

The landscape of psychology degrees across the USA is vast, with state-by-state differences in specializations and admissions criteria. For example, the best psychology degree rankings in Florida highlight programs that blend research skills and applied training. In the Southeast, students often compare the top psychology programs in Georgia for their unique concentrations and online offerings.

If you’re searching in the Midwest or Plains regions, the top psychology programs in Grand Forks feature accessible online courses and supportive faculty, while the best psychology program rankings in Grand Rapids showcase accredited degrees with strong local career connections.

With so many choices, researching accredited online programs and regional strengths can help you find a pathway tailored to your ambitions—whether you plan to work in clinical practice, counseling, research, or organizational psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Mick Cooper

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles