World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
47
Citations
7716
World Ranking
3437
National Ranking
581

Miranda Wolpert publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Miranda Wolpert sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 189 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Miranda Wolpert D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Miranda Wolpert sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Miranda Wolpert is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom and has a research focus primarily in the field of psychology. Their work spans several subfields including clinical psychology, general health professions, applied psychology, social psychology, and sociology and political science.

The scientist's main research topics include child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, mental health research topics, digital mental health interventions, mental health treatment and access, health policy implementation science, adolescent and pediatric healthcare, and Q methodology applications.

Recent scientific contributions by Miranda Wolpert include the following publications:

  • The Lancet and Financial Times Commission on governing health futures 2030: growing up in a digital world, 2021, The Lancet
  • Treatment outcomes for depression: challenges and opportunities, 2020, The Lancet Psychiatry
  • Managing uncertainty in the covid-19 era, 2020, BMJ
  • Generalized linear mixed-model (GLMM) trees: A flexible decision-tree method for multilevel and longitudinal data, 2020, Psychotherapy Research
  • Identifying and integrating active ingredients for mental health, 2021, The Lancet Psychiatry

They have frequently published in venues such as European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, The Lancet Psychiatry, PsycTESTS Dataset, The Lancet, and Psychotherapy Research.

Collaborative work has involved coauthors including Julian Edbrooke-Childs, Holly Alice Bear, Karolin Rose Krause, Catherine L. Sebastian, and Inês Pote.

Best Publications

  • Measures of Social and Emotional Skills for Children and Young People: A Systematic Review

    Neil Humphrey;Afroditi Kalambouka;Michael Wigelsworth;Ann Lendrum

  • Systematic review of approaches to using patient experience data for quality improvement in healthcare settings

    Helen Gleeson;Ana Calderon;Viren Swami;Jessica Deighton

  • Measuring mental health and wellbeing outcomes for children and adolescents to inform practice and policy: a review of child self-report measures

    Jessica Deighton;Tim J. Croudace;Peter Fonagy;Jeb Brown

  • Mental health and well-being trends among children and young people in the UK, 1995-2014: analysis of repeated cross-sectional national health surveys.

    Jacqueline Pitchforth;Katie Fahy;Tamsin Ford;Miranda Wolpert

  • A general psychopathology factor in early adolescence.

    Praveetha Patalay;Peter Fonagy;Jessica Deighton;Jay Belsky

  • Treatment outcomes for depression: challenges and opportunities

    Pim Cuijpers;Argyris Stringaris;Miranda Wolpert;Miranda Wolpert

  • Prevalence of mental health problems in schools: poverty and other risk factors among 28 000 adolescents in England.

    Jessica Deighton;Suzet Tanya Lereya;Polly Casey;Praveetha Patalay

  • Feedback from Outcome Measures and Treatment Effectiveness, Treatment Efficiency, and Collaborative Practice: A Systematic Review

    Dawid Gondek;Julian Edbrooke-Childs;Elian Fink;Jessica Deighton

  • Mental Health Difficulties in Early Adolescence: A Comparison of Two Cross-Sectional Studies in England From 2009 to 2014

    Elian Fink;Praveetha Patalay;Helen Sharpe;Simone Holley

  • How do schools promote emotional well-being among their pupils? Findings from a national scoping survey of mental health provision in English schools

    Panos Vostanis;Neil Humphrey;Natasha Fitzgerald;Jessica Deighton

  • The Development of a School-Based Measure of Child Mental Health

    Jessica Deighton;Peter Tymms;Panos Vostanis;Jay Belsky

  • International consensus on a standard set of outcome measures for child and youth anxiety, depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder

    Karolin R Krause;Sophie Chung;Abiodun O Adewuya;Anne Marie Albano

  • Making Sense of ADHD: A Battle for Understanding? Parents' Views of Their Children Being Diagnosed with ADHD:

    Alexandra Harborne;Miranda Wolpert;Linda Clare

  • Satisfaction in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services: Translating Users' Feedback into Measurement

    Anna Brown;Tamsin Ford;Jessica Deighton;Miranda Wolpert

  • Managing uncertainty in the covid-19 era.

    Harry Rutter;Miranda Wolpert;Trisha Greenhalgh

  • Patient-reported outcomes in child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS): Use of idiographic and standardized measures

    Miranda Wolpert;Tamsin Ford;Emma Trustam;Duncan Law

  • Uses and Abuses of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs): Potential Iatrogenic Impact of PROMs Implementation and How It Can Be Mitigated

    Miranda Wolpert

  • Facilitators and Barriers to Person-centred Care in Child and Young People Mental Health Services: A Systematic Review.

    Dawid Gondek;Julian Edbrooke-Childs;Tjasa Velikonja;Louise Chapman

  • Achieving Precision Mental Health through Effective Assessment, Monitoring, and Feedback Processes

    Leonard Bickman;Aaron R. Lyon;Miranda Wolpert

  • Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Outcomes of Routine Specialist Mental Health Care for Young People With Depression and/or Anxiety

    Holly Alice Bear;Julian Edbrooke-Childs;Sam Norton;Karolin Rose Krause

  • Measurement Issues: Review of four patient reported outcome measures: SDQ, RCADS, C/ORS and GBO - their strengths and limitations for clinical use and service evaluation.

    Miranda Wolpert;Helen Cheng;Jessica Deighton

Frequent Co-Authors

Jessica Deighton
Jessica Deighton University College London
Julian Edbrooke-Childs
Julian Edbrooke-Childs University College London
Peter Fonagy
Peter Fonagy University College London
Neil Humphrey
Neil Humphrey University of Manchester
Panos Vostanis
Panos Vostanis University of Leicester
Tamsin Ford
Tamsin Ford University of Cambridge
Jay Belsky
Jay Belsky University of California, Davis
Nick Midgley
Nick Midgley University College London
Jonathan Green
Jonathan Green University of Manchester
Rachel Calam
Rachel Calam University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The field of Social Sciences and Humanities offers a wide range of accelerated degree programs designed to help students start their careers faster. These programs allow you to earn a bachelor’s degree in less time than traditional routes, opening doors to positions in education, social services, and public policy.

Many students interested in human behavior and mental health opt for an online masters in psychology. Such programs provide specialized knowledge and practical skills, and with affordable tuition options, they make advanced education more accessible than ever.

For those seeking leadership roles in education, pursuing the fastest edd program online can be a strategic choice. These fast-track doctorates are ideal for professionals eager to advance quickly into administrative or academic leadership positions.

If you’re looking for efficient ways to upskill or pivot your career, consider the online masters programs that can be completed in a single year. This fast completion time helps you stay competitive in dynamic job markets while reducing time away from work or other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Miranda Wolpert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles