World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 36 9534 8916 940 900 140 5310

Jessica Deighton publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jessica Deighton between 2011 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jessica Deighton published across 16 years, from 2011 to 2026, averaging 10.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2019. 15 of the 175 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2011 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2019. 2011: 2 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 14 publications 2026: 1 publication
2011 2026

175 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jessica Deighton: publications per year, 2011 to 2026
Year Publications
2011 2
2012 2
2013 8
2014 8
2015 15
2016 17
2017 9
2018 10
2019 18
2020 11
2021 14
2022 16
2023 15
2024 15
2025 14
2026 1
Total 175
Download as CSV

Jessica Deighton publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jessica Deighton sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 140 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 140
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jessica Deighton D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jessica Deighton sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 36
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jessica Deighton is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology, social sciences, and health professions, with a concentration in clinical psychology, education, general health professions, speech and hearing, and social psychology.

Their work focuses on several key topics, including:

  • Child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development
  • Early childhood education and development
  • Adolescent and pediatric healthcare
  • Child abuse and trauma
  • Resilience and mental health
  • Youth substance use and school attendance
  • Health disparities and outcomes

Recent publications by Jessica Deighton encompass various aspects of adolescent mental health and intervention strategies. Notable papers include:

  • "Gender difference in the change of adolescents' mental health and subjective wellbeing trajectories" (2022), published in European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • "Effectiveness of current psychological interventions to improve emotion regulation in youth: a meta-analysis" (2020), European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • "Barriers and Facilitators to Sustaining School-Based Mental Health and Wellbeing Interventions: A Systematic Review" (2022), International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • "Problem severity and waiting times for young people accessing mental health services" (2020), BJPsych Open
  • "The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on adolescent mental health: a natural experiment" (2022), Royal Society Open Science

Jessica Deighton frequently collaborates with other researchers in the field, including:

  • Julian Edbrooke-Childs
  • Suzet Tanya Lereya
  • Ruth Gilbert
  • Daniel Hayes
  • Emily Stapley

Their publications commonly appear in prominent journals such as:

  • Trials
  • European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • BMC Psychiatry
  • Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Best Publications

  • Measures of Social and Emotional Skills for Children and Young People: A Systematic Review

    Neil Humphrey;Afroditi Kalambouka;Michael Wigelsworth;Ann Lendrum

  • Systematic review of approaches to using patient experience data for quality improvement in healthcare settings

    Helen Gleeson;Ana Calderon;Viren Swami;Jessica Deighton

  • Measuring mental health and wellbeing outcomes for children and adolescents to inform practice and policy: a review of child self-report measures

    Jessica Deighton;Tim J. Croudace;Peter Fonagy;Jeb Brown

  • A general psychopathology factor in early adolescence.

    Praveetha Patalay;Peter Fonagy;Jessica Deighton;Jay Belsky

  • Prevalence of mental health problems in schools: poverty and other risk factors among 28 000 adolescents in England.

    Jessica Deighton;Suzet Tanya Lereya;Polly Casey;Praveetha Patalay

  • Gender difference in the change of adolescents’ mental health and subjective wellbeing trajectories

    Unknown

  • Feedback from Outcome Measures and Treatment Effectiveness, Treatment Efficiency, and Collaborative Practice: A Systematic Review

    Dawid Gondek;Julian Edbrooke-Childs;Elian Fink;Jessica Deighton

  • Mental Health Difficulties in Early Adolescence: A Comparison of Two Cross-Sectional Studies in England From 2009 to 2014

    Elian Fink;Praveetha Patalay;Helen Sharpe;Simone Holley

  • Longitudinal pathways between mental health difficulties and academic performance during middle childhood and early adolescence.

    Jessica Deighton;Neil Humphrey;Jay Belsky;Jan Boehnke

  • How do schools promote emotional well-being among their pupils? Findings from a national scoping survey of mental health provision in English schools

    Panos Vostanis;Neil Humphrey;Natasha Fitzgerald;Jessica Deighton

  • The Development of a School-Based Measure of Child Mental Health

    Jessica Deighton;Peter Tymms;Panos Vostanis;Jay Belsky

  • Satisfaction in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services: Translating Users' Feedback into Measurement

    Anna Brown;Tamsin Ford;Jessica Deighton;Miranda Wolpert

  • Effectiveness of current psychological interventions to improve emotion regulation in youth: a meta-analysis

    Bettina Moltrecht;Jessica Deighton;Praveetha Patalay;Julian Edbrooke-Childs

  • Patient-reported outcomes in child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS): Use of idiographic and standardized measures

    Miranda Wolpert;Tamsin Ford;Emma Trustam;Duncan Law

  • Barriers and Facilitators to Sustaining School-Based Mental Health and Wellbeing Interventions: A Systematic Review

    Unknown

  • Measurement Issues: Review of four patient reported outcome measures: SDQ, RCADS, C/ORS and GBO - their strengths and limitations for clinical use and service evaluation.

    Miranda Wolpert;Helen Cheng;Jessica Deighton

  • Embedding mental health support in schools: learning from the Targeted Mental Health in Schools (TaMHS) national evaluation

    Miranda Wolpert;Neil Humphrey;Jay Belsky;Jessica Deighton

  • The psychometric properties of the Ages & Stages Questionnaires for ages 2-2.5: a systematic review

    Tjasa Velikonja;Julian H. Edbrooke-Childs;Ana Calderon;Michelle Sleed

  • Clinical validity of the Me and My School questionnaire: a self-report mental health measure for children and adolescents

    Praveetha Patalay;Jessica Deighton;Peter Fonagy;Panos Vostanis

  • The relationship between child- and parent-reported shared decision making and child-, parent-, and clinician-reported treatment outcome in routinely collected child mental health services data.

    Julian Edbrooke-Childs;Jenna Jacob;Rachel Argent;Praveetha Patalay

  • Routine outcomes monitoring as part of children and young people's Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (CYP IAPT) – improving care or unhelpful burden?

    Miranda Wolpert;Miranda Wolpert;Andrew J.B. Fugard;Andrew J.B. Fugard;Jessica Deighton;Anke Görzig

  • Comparison of indices of clinically meaningful change in child and adolescent mental health services: difference scores, reliable change, crossing clinical thresholds and ‘added value’ – an exploration using parent rated scores on the SDQ

    Miranda Wolpert;Anke Görzig;Anke Görzig;Jessica Deighton;Andrew J.B. Fugard

Frequent Co-Authors

Miranda Wolpert
Miranda Wolpert University College London
Julian Edbrooke-Childs
Julian Edbrooke-Childs University College London
Peter Fonagy
Peter Fonagy University College London
Neil Humphrey
Neil Humphrey University of Manchester
Panos Vostanis
Panos Vostanis University of Leicester
Jay Belsky
Jay Belsky University of California, Davis
Tamsin Ford
Tamsin Ford University of Cambridge
Russell M. Viner
Russell M. Viner University College London
Adrian Furnham
Adrian Furnham BI Norwegian Business School
Nadia Micali
Nadia Micali University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology online in the USA opens doors to a wide range of degree programs and career paths. Many students expand their expertise by pursuing counseling-focused degrees, which offer both flexibility and specialized training for roles such as school counselors, mental health counselors, or marriage and family therapists.

Interested students can explore top counseling degree programs in the Northeast for comprehensive programs known for academic excellence. If you're considering studying in a major metropolitan area, check out the top counseling degree programs in New York, which often provide diverse internship and networking opportunities.

Midwest-bound students might be drawn to the top counseling degree programs in Ohio, admired for their close-knit learning environments. Those looking for high-quality, affordable learning in the South Central region should consider the best college counseling programs in Oklahoma.

Online pathways in psychology and counseling are ideal for those seeking to balance studies with personal or professional commitments, and provide a strong foundation for meaningful, people-centered careers.

Best Scientists Citing Jessica Deighton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles